2016 Browns Season Thread

• BR1986FB

  Al Bundy;1768112 wrote:The Browns need help everywhere except left tackle. If the Browns end up with #1 pick, take Bosa.

  Seeing a few mocks with them taking Bosa. Mocks I saw said Lynch & Goff can definitely be franchise QB's but not worthy of the #1 overall. Which, unless they decide to go the "usual" route and take a developmental type QB, that would leave possibilities like RG III, Kaepernick, Stafford (if DET trades him).
• BR1986FB

  Footwedge;1768110 wrote:Browns need help everywhere EXCEPT quarterback. You should be happy that the team at least has a franchise quarterback. They need to deal their number one overall for as many picks as they can. Farmer and Pettine needs to be fired immediately, and it's time to move forward.

  The QB play this year has been adequate but there's not a guy on this roster capable of leading them to a Lombardi Trophy.
  
  Johnny Kardashian is more concerned about when he'll next show up on TMZ than putting in time, honing his craft. He doesn't love the game....he loves the fame of being "Johnny Football", not Johnny "football player."
• DeyDurkie5

  

  BR1986FB;1768118 wrote:Johnny Kardashian is more concerned about when he'll next show up on TMZ than putting in time, honing his craft. He doesn't love the game....he loves the fame of being "Johnny Football", not Johnny "football player."

  Please share with us more of your knowledge of the Browns
• BR1986FB

  DeyDurkie5;1768135 wrote:Please share with us more of your knowledge of the Browns

  Dynamite drop in. Nice to see you're bringing something of value to this thread again. :rolleyes:
• DeyDurkie5

  

  BR1986FB;1768139 wrote:Dynamite drop in. Nice to see you're bringing something of value to this thread again. :rolleyes:

  You spouting off about something you know nothing about is great value.
• like_that

  

  Footwedge;1768097 wrote:I don't care who this outfit is that rates o tackles but Joe Thomas is as over rated as it can get., He is a decent pass blocker but a horrible run blocker and has been for years.

  BR1986FB;1768102 wrote:I think he's an exceptional pass blocker. I can't recall ever debating that part of his game but I do think he's an athletic/finesse type LT. Not a mauler who you can run behind who is a lock to get you 1-3 yards when you need it. I definitely think he's a 1st ballot HOFer but I've always had a beef with his run blocking skills.

  Footwedge;1768106 wrote:If you suck as a run blocker...which he has for years, then he has no business being on a HOF ballot. Hall of Famers don't have 10 plus penalties every year either.

  Since you guys don't trust PFF's rating (very credible source) on JT's run blocking, please just watch this video. Yeah, very average run blocker.:rolleyes:
  
  https://twitter.com/BigDuke50/status/651633757254905856
  
  Just imagine if he actually played on a team that didn't go thru the motions for 70% of the year.
• Lovejoy1984

  

  Personally with the talent core being as low as it is, i'm drafting anything but QB this year, as none of the top prospects scream can't miss. Give Manziel the job this offseason, and for next year. Maybe he pulls it together, maybe it's a total shit show, and we can pick high again next year.
  
  Draft the Best defender available, that fits the scheme of the Head coach, and go from there, which means don't take Bosa and try and turn him in to an outside linebacker.
  
  Hopefully the new GM values the skill positions a little more, and we can grab a playmaker in the 2nd round, and then draft BPA from that point on. Don't worry about drafting for need, draft for talent.
• Commander of Awesome

  

  HighRoller74;1768143 wrote:Personally with the talent core being as low as it is, i'm drafting anything but QB this year, as none of the top prospects scream can't miss. Give Manziel the job this offseason, and for next year. Maybe he pulls it together, maybe it's a total shit show, and we can pick high again next year.
  
  Draft the Best defender available, that fits the scheme of the Head coach, and go from there, which means don't take Bosa and try and turn him in to an outside linebacker.
  
  Hopefully the new GM values the skill positions a little more, and we can grab a playmaker in the 2nd round, and then draft BPA from that point on. Don't worry about drafting for need, draft for talent.

  I'm all about the QB. Get me a fucking QB. And some Def players that like to hit.
• SportsAndLady

  

  HighRoller74;1768143 wrote:Personally with the talent core being as low as it is, i'm drafting anything but QB this year, as none of the top prospects scream can't miss. Give Manziel the job this offseason, and for next year. Maybe he pulls it together, maybe it's a total shit show, and we can pick high again next year.
  
  Draft the Best defender available, that fits the scheme of the Head coach, and go from there, which means don't take Bosa and try and turn him in to an outside linebacker.
  
  Hopefully the new GM values the skill positions a little more, and we can grab a playmaker in the 2nd round, and then draft BPA from that point on. Don't worry about drafting for need, draft for talent.

  I mean this with all due respect lol
  
  But fuck directly off!
  
  If we have the top pick of the draft, and don't have a sure fire franchise QB on the roster, and they draft anything but a QB, I will lose my fucking shit.
• like_that

  

  Yeah come on HR. At least the Browns have a line that can pass block for said future rookie QB.
• SportsAndLady

  

  If any franchise has ever deserved a #1 pick for a QB, it's the Browns. If they get it, and draft a D lineman, we don't deserve to win.
• Lovejoy1984

  

  Commander of Awesome;1768145 wrote:I'm all about the QB. Get me a fucking QB. And some Def players that like to hit.

  SportsAndLady;1768147 wrote:I mean this with all due respect lol
  
  But fuck directly off!
  
  If we have the top pick of the draft, and don't have a sure fire franchise QB on the roster, and they draft anything but a QB, I will lose my fucking shit.

  Normally, I'd agree with this, however from all the scouting reports i've seen, is that Neither Goff, or Lynch are sure fire Franchise QB's. And neither one will be ready to play next season.
  
  Leading me to my next point....
  

  like_that;1768149 wrote:Yeah come on HR. At least the Browns have a line that can pass block for said future rookie QB.

  Browns QB's have been sacked 41 times so far this year, and with 4 games to do, that number will approach 50, which will lead the league. So saying we've got the line to protect them is a bit of a stretch.
  
  I'm just tired of the "Take a QB, because we Need one Mantra". I'd rather build up the rest of our team, and hopefully be able to put together a serviceable enough QB. But, it's not like that strategy has worked out for us thus far, as it seems that's what we've been doing.
  
  If the new coach/GM really like a player, and feel they can be that franchise guy, then of course, I'd be all for it, just personally I'd be skeptical, based on what I've read from the "experts".
• Mulva

  

  Anybody on here still have an active PFF subscription to access signature stats? I'd be interested to see where Browns QBs rank in terms of average time to attempt and time to sack.
• SportsAndLady

  

  HighRoller74;1768155 wrote:Normally, I'd agree with this, however from all the scouting reports i've seen, is that Neither Goff, or Lynch are sure fire Franchise QB's. And neither one will be ready to play next season.
  
  Leading me to my next point....
  
  
  
  Browns QB's have been sacked 41 times so far this year, and with 4 games to do, that number will approach 50, which will lead the league. So saying we've got the line to protect them is a bit of a stretch.
  
  I'm just tired of the "Take a QB, because we Need one Mantra". I'd rather build up the rest of our team, and hopefully be able to put together a serviceable enough QB. But, it's not like that strategy has worked out for us thus far, as it seems that's what we've been doing.
  
  If the new coach/GM really like a player, and feel they can be that franchise guy, then of course, I'd be all for it, just personally I'd be skeptical, based on what I've read from the "experts".

  A QB will emerge, it's early. There WILL be a good QB in this draft. How many drafts recently haven't had a franchise QB in it? I'm not talking Andrew Luck, I mean a QB that you can build off--for example, 2014, Blake Bortles. He's no Andrew Luck, but he's someone Jax can build around, and have built around. Maybe 2013, if you don't like EJ Manuel.
  
  I've honestly never disagreed with someone more than I do right now with you. Wasting the #1 overall pick on anyone other than a QB would set this franchise back another 10 years.
• Ironman92

  

  SportsAndLady;1768167 wrote:A QB will emerge, it's early. There WILL be a good QB in this draft. How many drafts recently haven't had a franchise QB in it? I'm not talking Andrew Luck, I mean a QB that you can build off--for example, 2014, Blake Bortles. He's no Andrew Luck, but he's someone Jax can build around, and have built around. Maybe 2013, if you don't like EJ Manuel.
  
  I've honestly never disagreed with someone more than I do right now with you. Wasting the #1 overall pick on anyone other than a QB would set this franchise back another 10 years.

  If they drafted Bosa and went 3-13 again and got the #1......or even the 2 or 3 and got a top QB next year, how would that put them back 10.
  
  You are crystal clear on your stance...just wondering the 10 year comment. And not being an ass but if you are so adamant on finding a great guy to build around at QB then why not take the best available QB in each of the first 3 rounds?
• like_that

  

  HighRoller74;1768155 wrote:Normally, I'd agree with this, however from all the scouting reports i've seen, is that Neither Goff, or Lynch are sure fire Franchise QB's. And neither one will be ready to play next season.
  
  Leading me to my next point....
  
  
  
  Browns QB's have been sacked 41 times so far this year, and with 4 games to do, that number will approach 50, which will lead the league. So saying we've got the line to protect them is a bit of a stretch.
  
  I'm just tired of the "Take a QB, because we Need one Mantra". I'd rather build up the rest of our team, and hopefully be able to put together a serviceable enough QB. But, it's not like that strategy has worked out for us thus far, as it seems that's what we've been doing.
  
  If the new coach/GM really like a player, and feel they can be that franchise guy, then of course, I'd be all for it, just personally I'd be skeptical, based on what I've read from the "experts".

  I'm putting most of the blame there on McCown. He holds on the ball too fucking long and takes way too many costly sacks. This is the same shit we thought when weeden was our QB. We thought the line regressed then all of a sudden Hoyer is playing and the sacks magically disappeared. An oline can only do so much for a QB who holds onto the ball way too long.
• like_that

  

  Mulva;1768157 wrote:Anybody on here still have an active PFF subscription to access signature stats? I'd be interested to see where Browns QBs rank in terms of average time to attempt and time to sack.

  They got rid of signature stats, pisses me the fuck off.
• like_that

  

  Ironman92;1768174 wrote:If they drafted Bosa and went 3-13 again and got the #1......or even the 2 or 3 and got a top QB next year, how would that put them back 10.
  
  You are crystal clear on your stance...just wondering the 10 year comment. And not being an ass but if you are so adamant on finding a great guy to build around at QB then why not take the best available QB in each of the first 3 rounds?

  Who is the sure fire QB coming out next year? I don't get the "sure fire" argument. In the last 10 years how many "sure fire" QBs did we have coming thru the draft? I can only think of Luck and maybe Winston, but even he wasn't getting the same love as Luck. Lynch and Goff may not be NFL ready from day 1, but neither are 95% of the QBs who are drafted. We aren't drafting a QB expecting him to go from 2-14 to a playoff season the following year. Carr wasn't NFL ready last year, but playing last season paid off for this season so far.
• SportsAndLady

  

  Ironman92;1768174 wrote:If they drafted Bosa and went 3-13 again and got the #1......or even the 2 or 3 and got a top QB next year, how would that put them back 10.
  
  You are crystal clear on your stance...just wondering the 10 year comment. And not being an ass but if you are so adamant on finding a great guy to build around at QB then why not take the best available QB in each of the first 3 rounds?

  Well yeah, that would be great. But that isn't reality.
  
  They'd probably go 6-10 next year, with an easier schedule, and draft 11 overall. And have to take another QB at 22.
• like_that

  

  Seriously, who is the sure fire QB for next draft?
• Ironman92

  

  SportsAndLady;1768184 wrote:Well yeah, that would be great. But that isn't reality.
  
  They'd probably go 6-10 next year, with an easier schedule, and draft 11 overall. And have to take another QB at 22.

  Apologies if I'm being a dumbass but how is having the 11th pick drafting a QB 22nd?
• Ironman92

  

  like_that;1768181 wrote:Who is the sure fire QB coming out next year? I don't get the "sure fire" argument. In the last 10 years how many "sure fire" QBs did we have coming thru the draft? I can only think of Luck and maybe Winston, but even he wasn't getting the same love as Luck. Lynch and Goff may not be NFL ready from day 1, but neither are 95% of the QBs who are drafted. We aren't drafting a QB expecting him to go from 2-14 to a playoff season the following year. Carr wasn't NFL ready last year, but playing last season paid off for this season so far.

  Don't think I ever said anything about sure-fire. I don't know a great amount about the available QB's in this draft.
• Lovejoy1984

  

  SportsAndLady;1768167 wrote:A QB will emerge, it's early. There WILL be a good QB in this draft. How many drafts recently haven't had a franchise QB in it? I'm not talking Andrew Luck, I mean a QB that you can build off--for example, 2014, Blake Bortles. He's no Andrew Luck, but he's someone Jax can build around, and have built around. Maybe 2013, if you don't like EJ Manuel.
  
  I've honestly never disagreed with someone more than I do right now with you. Wasting the #1 overall pick on anyone other than a QB would set this franchise back another 10 years.

  Valid point, admittedly I've not watched much of either guy, going by what the so-called experts have said.
• Laley23

  

  The NFL is littered with QBs who were looked at as pro caliber but far from locks. Just in the last few drafts...
  
  Bridgewater
  Bortles
  Marriota and Winston (depending on who you ask)
  Carr
  Tannehill
  Osweiler
  Wilson
  Dalton
  Bradford
  Flacco
  Stafford (honestly don't recall the buzz on him, maybe he was considered sure fire)
  Cutler
  Rogers
  Smith
  Orton
  
  Thats the last 10 years. There are also PLENTY of busts taken in the 1st two rounds. But there are ALWAYS guys worth taking. It's just the Browns have been uncanny at finding the wrong ones...2007 and 2013 are the only years I'd consider to not have a QB who was sure fire nor a QB who panned out as a possibility. I guess 2013 is still a bit early, but looking bad.
• Ironman92

  

  Stafford was pretty high on most boards I thought