Archive

Women and Minorities: A Question.

  • Pick6
    ernest_t_bass;1396549 wrote:no, quite the contrary, actually.
    darn. wish I would have saw this before F4F edited.
  • sleeper
    BoatShoes;1396571 wrote:0 yAy another oppressed white guy! Tell us more about how like_that owned the thread by acknowledging that most of an entire race of people want a handout!
    Tell me BoatShoes; if blacks are equal, why do they need handouts like affirmative action or protected classes? Read that closely. WHY DO THEY NEED THEM? Please tell me how the white man is holding them back; oh gosh a ruddies. :laugh:
  • ernest_t_bass
    Pick6;1396574 wrote:darn. wish I would have saw this before F4F edited.
    He edited my quoted part, not what I actually said. Check your PM.
  • BoatShoes
    sleeper;1396566 wrote:If that was the case, where are all these stunning examples of black success? The Oprah story is the exception, not the rule. :thumbup:
    Is this for real? I'm aware of the trolling nature of your internet persona but almost the entire NFL and NBA. Any professional athlete has to earn their success through talent and dedication and not rely merely on a racial preference. So, for example, Troy Smith at tOSU earned the heisman trophy through talent, skill and hard work and was not merely awarded it because he was black.
  • sleeper
    BoatShoes;1396578 wrote:Is this for real? I'm aware of the trolling nature of your internet persona but almost the entire NFL and NBA. Any professional athlete has to earn their success through talent and dedication and not rely merely on a racial preference. So, for example, Troy Smith at tOSU earned the heisman trophy through talent, skill and hard work and was not merely awarded it because he was black.
    Talk about your racial stereotypes. I guess blacks can only be successful on the field and not off. Grow up. :thumbdown:
  • sleeper
    Also it's not trolling. It's merely using sarcasm and exaggerations to dispel your broken logic rather than expending effort trying to convince someone who's in bed with protecting his precious minority votes over logic and reason. MOAR HANDOUTS FOR BLACK PEOPLE = MOAR VOTES. Those racist Republicans for trying to treat everyone equal! :cool:
  • BoatShoes
    sleeper;1396575 wrote:Tell me BoatShoes; if blacks are equal, why do they need handouts like affirmative action or protected classes? Read that closely. WHY DO THEY NEED THEM? Please tell me how the white man is holding them back; oh gosh a ruddies. :laugh:
    There is a difference between need and dessert. And, it's not so much that the white man is "holding them down" but that white people don't get to have hegemony for centuries saying that race matters and then when that hegemony is erased suddenly so "0 ju5t kidd1n guys we're a colorle55 s0ciety!"
  • BoatShoes
    sleeper;1396581 wrote:Talk about your racial stereotypes. I guess blacks can only be successful on the field and not off. Grow up. :thumbdown:
    LoL. How's about Herman Cain and Dr. Ben Carson and Thomas Sowell and Walter Williams. Those blacks worthy of your saying they earned their success? It is silly for me to start listing successful black people because your internet troll personality likes to demean black people as a race. I.E. even asking the question "If blacks are equal"
  • sleeper
    BoatShoes;1396585 wrote:There is a difference between need and dessert. And, it's not so much that the white man is "holding them down" but that white people don't get to have hegemony for centuries saying that race matters and then when that hegemony is erased suddenly so "0 ju5t kidd1n guys we're a colorle55 s0ciety!"
    So 200 years from now, will white people receive benefits for the color of their skin because of the "hegemony" being experienced by whites right now? Like I said, minorities need to grow up.
  • Raw Dawgin' it
    In 200 years mexicans will out number us all so yes, in 200 years whites will benefit from minority hand outs.
  • ernest_t_bass
    Raw Dawgin' it;1396591 wrote:In 200 years mexicans will out number us all so yes, in 200 years whites will benefit from minority hand outs.
    Except they won't, because they enslaved people 300-400 years prior.
  • sleeper
    BoatShoes;1396588 wrote:LoL. How's about Herman Cain and Dr. Ben Carson and Thomas Sowell and Walter Williams. Those blacks worthy of your saying they earned their success? It is silly for me to start listing successful black people because your internet troll personality likes to demean black people as a race. I.E. even asking the question "If blacks are equal"
    If they can do it, why do we need racist handouts? There's your proof; get rid of AA.
  • sleeper
    Also, I wonder where they would be without handouts and how many white people they had to trample on with their free handouts and legups to get to the top. Gosh a ruddies, I guess hard work is no longer relevant; just the color of skin.
  • queencitybuckeye
    sleeper;1396599 wrote:Also, I wonder where they would be without handouts and how many white people they had to trample on with their free handouts and legups to get to the top. Gosh a ruddies, I guess hard work is no longer relevant; just the color of skin.
    If true, it's only the pigmentation that's changed, not the situation.
  • sleeper
    queencitybuckeye;1396605 wrote:If true, it's only the pigmentation that's changed, not the situation.
    The best way to fight racism is with more racism. Minorities, taking the low road since 1965. :laugh:
  • ytownfootball
    It's only going to get worse. The G ay and Lesbian coalition has been pushing their agenda for the same type of benefits most minorities are eligible for for years so I guess there will be a need to be stepping up the game a little bit.
  • queencitybuckeye
    sleeper;1396616 wrote:The best way to fight racism is with more racism. Minorities, taking the low road since 1965. :laugh:
    At the risk of being serious, I'd welcome your solution. Hopefully, it's more substantial than other paraphrase of "Yes, white males discriminated against everyone else for two centuries, but now we've decided there will be no more discrimination. Honest".
  • sleeper
    queencitybuckeye;1396619 wrote:At the risk of being serious, I'd welcome your solution. Hopefully, it's more substantial than other paraphrase of "Yes, white males discriminated against everyone else for two centuries, but now we've decided there will be no more discrimination. Honest".
    Oh Christ. Yes, white males born today were directly involved in discrimination and therefore should be punished accordingly. Give me a break.

    You want a solution? Cut the shit.
  • sleeper
    An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind. :thumbup:
  • like_that
    ernest_t_bass;1396546 wrote:No, the problem is, given that scenario, the answer is easy. Instead of answering said scenario with the obvious easy answer, you try to spin it.
    All zwick ever does is back pedal. He doesn't even know wtf he is arguing about 90% of the time once he is caught in an argument.
    bigdaddy2003;1396565 wrote:Like_that, you have owned this thread. I wish I could've repped you multiple times. Well done sir.

    Lol at the people who think minorities still have it as rough as they did in the pre-1965. I would love to come to your neighborhood and see these injustices. The only white people can be racist and white people have nothing to complain about arguments always bring the laughs as well.
    lol thanks. This makes me laugh as well. When a black person cries racism/unfair treatment they are expressing their right to freedom of speech. When a white person does the same, he/she is a racist scumbag all because of what happened 200 years ago. GTFO.
    BoatShoes;1396585 wrote:There is a difference between need and dessert. And, it's not so much that the white man is "holding them down" but that white people don't get to have hegemony for centuries saying that race matters and then when that hegemony is erased suddenly so "0 ju5t kidd1n guys we're a colorle55 s0ciety!"
    LOL, just answer his fucking question.
    sleeper;1396589 wrote:So 200 years from now, will white people receive benefits for the color of their skin because of the "hegemony" being experienced by whites right now? Like I said, minorities need to grow up.
    +1
    ernest_t_bass;1396593 wrote:Except they won't, because they enslaved people 300-400 years prior.
    lol'd
  • like_that
    Gblock;1396360 wrote:most black people..lol i bet you dont even know any
    I just saw this. My best friends in HS were black. I still hang out with black people.
  • queencitybuckeye
    sleeper;1396624 wrote:Oh Christ. Yes, white males born today were directly involved in discrimination
    Involved, no. Beneficiaries, yes. Argument fail, try again.
  • sleeper
    queencitybuckeye;1396647 wrote:Involved, no. Beneficiaries, yes. Argument fail, try again.
    Argument fail. I did not benefit from racist policies and I'm not benefiting from them now. :cool:
  • sleeper
    Like I've said, when does it end? You want racism to stop? Then grow up and fight against racism; not against equality.
  • hasbeen
    queencitybuckeye;1396305 wrote:Like the one you're playing here?

    What is the proper ratio for a couple centuries of abuse, or should they just get over it?
    How many living black people were slaves? What percentage of black people were alive during the Civil rights era? Why does a twenty -something black person deserve more government given opportunities than a twenty something white dude?

    I'm Irish and my ancestors were abuse. What's my ratio? I'm Irish on both sides all the way up back to Ireland.
    ZWICK 4 PREZ;1396307 wrote:I wasn't implying anything. Every black person in America, educated or not, has a different set of circumstances than you, a white man.

    that is the question.. b/c it obviously went right over your head.

    Every PERSON has a different set of circumstances than another. Race doesn't matter.


    I can't find the quote but someone said people will hire people more like them. Blacks do the same thing. Are there not enough black people who take the risks of owning a business? Do we need a quota on business owners instead?