posted by iclfan2

The St Louis couple who stood outside with guns after BLM broke into their neighborhood were hilarious. Dude’s wearing a pink Brooks bro polo tucked into his slacks and holding an AR, while his wife has her finger on the trigger of her pistol. Fuck BLM idiots for going into residential areas though, and I fully support the guy staring them down while armed.

Saw that....best part is that he didnt bother putting shoes on.  I bet it went like this:

"Honey, get strapped, we are heading out for some war!"

As for the optics of that video.....the best campaign add Trump could ever wish for are those 2 people armed to the gills to protect what they have against a hoard of people that have been allowed to break the law.  

posted by iclfan2

The St Louis couple who stood outside with guns after BLM broke into their neighborhood were hilarious. Dude’s wearing a pink Brooks bro polo tucked into his slacks and holding an AR, while his wife has her finger on the trigger of her pistol. Fuck BLM idiots for going into residential areas though, and I fully support the guy staring them down while armed.

Isn’t it illegal in Missouri to point a weapon at people? 

posted by iclfan2

The St Louis couple who stood outside with guns after BLM broke into their neighborhood were hilarious. Dude’s wearing a pink Brooks bro polo tucked into his slacks and holding an AR, while his wife has her finger on the trigger of her pistol. Fuck BLM idiots for going into residential areas though, and I fully support the guy staring them down while armed.

The guy was actually "ok" during the whole thing. The wife not so much. She has OBVIOUSLY never taken a single gun safety course. Good Lord she is lucky she didn't accidentally shoot someone.

posted by SportsAndLady

posted by iclfan2

The St Louis couple who stood outside with guns after BLM broke into their neighborhood were hilarious. Dude’s wearing a pink Brooks bro polo tucked into his slacks and holding an AR, while his wife has her finger on the trigger of her pistol. Fuck BLM idiots for going into residential areas though, and I fully support the guy staring them down while armed.

Isn’t it illegal in Missouri to point a weapon at people? 

If they were on their lawn probably not, but if not then the wife certainly could see charges. The husband not so much. 

I read some attorney in Missouri tweeting about how there will 100% be charges against the woman at some point. Basically saying she can’t just go up protestors with a gun and point it at them, because they didn’t constitute a real threat. 

I heard the man and woman are actually attorneys too and could be in some trouble if they get charged. 

posted by SportsAndLady

I read some attorney in Missouri tweeting about how there will 100% be charges against the woman at some point. Basically saying she can’t just go up protestors with a gun and point it at them, because they didn’t constitute a real threat. 

I heard the man and woman are actually attorneys too and could be in some trouble if they get charged. 

They’re multi millionaire attorneys themselves. The protestors were on a private street, which means they were trespassing, and when they told them that they threatened them. Just saw this article, and if he’s telling the truth he won’t be getting charged with anything. Where does that attorney get off saying “they didn’t constitute a real threat”? Still pretending the protestors are all peaceful?

https://www.ksdk.com/article/news/local/interview-man-with-rifle-during-st-louis-protest/63-eeb61c07-4adc-4df0-a7d0-000d40a89e78

posted by iclfan2

posted by SportsAndLady

I read some attorney in Missouri tweeting about how there will 100% be charges against the woman at some point. Basically saying she can’t just go up protestors with a gun and point it at them, because they didn’t constitute a real threat. 

I heard the man and woman are actually attorneys too and could be in some trouble if they get charged. 

They’re multi millionaire attorneys themselves. The protestors were on a private street, which means they were trespassing, and when they told them that they threatened them. Just saw this article, and if he’s telling the truth he won’t be getting charged with anything. Where does that attorney get off saying “they didn’t constitute a real threat”? Still pretending the protestors are all peaceful?

https://www.ksdk.com/article/news/local/interview-man-with-rifle-during-st-louis-protest/63-eeb61c07-4adc-4df0-a7d0-000d40a89e78

Lol wtf did you just send? “The only thing stopping them was my gun!” That’s the most white trash Missouri trash statement ever. Stop them from what? Did the protestors destroy the other houses on the block? Did they assault their neighbors? (The answer is no). The only threat constituted was from the inbred couple. 

Should the protestors have gone onto their property? No, of course not. Should the hilljack couple have gone outside with guns pointing them in the faces of the protestors? No. Both those statements can be true at the same time. Everyone in this situation was in the wrong

LOL

https://twitter.com/basedkarbon/status/1277581311650271232

Another murder in the CHOP.

https://twitter.com/BrandiKruse/status/1277635123110768640

posted by SportsAndLady

posted by iclfan2

posted by SportsAndLady

I read some attorney in Missouri tweeting about how there will 100% be charges against the woman at some point. Basically saying she can’t just go up protestors with a gun and point it at them, because they didn’t constitute a real threat. 

I heard the man and woman are actually attorneys too and could be in some trouble if they get charged. 

They’re multi millionaire attorneys themselves. The protestors were on a private street, which means they were trespassing, and when they told them that they threatened them. Just saw this article, and if he’s telling the truth he won’t be getting charged with anything. Where does that attorney get off saying “they didn’t constitute a real threat”? Still pretending the protestors are all peaceful?

https://www.ksdk.com/article/news/local/interview-man-with-rifle-during-st-louis-protest/63-eeb61c07-4adc-4df0-a7d0-000d40a89e78

Lol wtf did you just send? “The only thing stopping them was my gun!” That’s the most white trash Missouri trash statement ever. Stop them from what? Did the protestors destroy the other houses on the block? Did they assault their neighbors? (The answer is no). The only threat constituted was from the inbred couple. 

Should the protestors have gone onto their property? No, of course not. Should the hilljack couple have gone outside with guns pointing them in the faces of the protestors? No. Both those statements can be true at the same time. Everyone in this situation was in the wrong

NONONONONONONON.....you dont get it both ways.  Did they destroy anything?  No because they were met with a gun.  Was there assaults?  No because they were stopped.  

If those 2 didnt come out there, that neighborhood would have been tore up, spray paint everywhere, fires etc....  these protesters track record would indicate a 100% chance of it.

Calling them "hilljacks" or "inbreds"...GTFOH.  Millionaires with guns.....whats the matter?  Cant handle that?  Did you only think rednecks had guns?

posted by Spock

posted by SportsAndLady

posted by iclfan2

posted by SportsAndLady

I read some attorney in Missouri tweeting about how there will 100% be charges against the woman at some point. Basically saying she can’t just go up protestors with a gun and point it at them, because they didn’t constitute a real threat. 

I heard the man and woman are actually attorneys too and could be in some trouble if they get charged. 

They’re multi millionaire attorneys themselves. The protestors were on a private street, which means they were trespassing, and when they told them that they threatened them. Just saw this article, and if he’s telling the truth he won’t be getting charged with anything. Where does that attorney get off saying “they didn’t constitute a real threat”? Still pretending the protestors are all peaceful?

https://www.ksdk.com/article/news/local/interview-man-with-rifle-during-st-louis-protest/63-eeb61c07-4adc-4df0-a7d0-000d40a89e78

Lol wtf did you just send? “The only thing stopping them was my gun!” That’s the most white trash Missouri trash statement ever. Stop them from what? Did the protestors destroy the other houses on the block? Did they assault their neighbors? (The answer is no). The only threat constituted was from the inbred couple. 

Should the protestors have gone onto their property? No, of course not. Should the hilljack couple have gone outside with guns pointing them in the faces of the protestors? No. Both those statements can be true at the same time. Everyone in this situation was in the wrong

NONONONONONONON.....you dont get it both ways.  Did they destroy anything?  No because they were met with a gun.  Was there assaults?  No because they were stopped.  

If those 2 didnt come out there, that neighborhood would have been tore up, spray paint everywhere, fires etc....  these protesters track record would indicate a 100% chance of it.

Calling them "hilljacks" or "inbreds"...GTFOH.  Millionaires with guns.....whats the matter?  Cant handle that?  Did you only think rednecks had guns?

Lol...so all their neighbors houses got raided because there was no one standing outside with a gun, right? 

These inbreds SAVED THE DAY!

Wait, were the protests in St. Louis destroying things before or after they strolled by that house? Do we know that for sure? I've seen a few vidoes and everyone seemed calm. 

As far as I know, most or nearly all of these protests are peaceful. There are not mobs rolling through the streets breaking shit. 

posted by justincredible

Another murder in the CHOP.

https://twitter.com/BrandiKruse/status/1277635123110768640

Wait a minute......"security" shot two kids?!?  Defund CHOP!!!!

I think it's a stretch to say what WOULD HAVE (props for not saying 'would of') happened. But I can understand why the couple was on edge given violent attacks earlier in the day in St Louis. That said, the lady did this couple no favors. The guy was mostly fine. The wife needs to invest in some training.

posted by ptown_trojans_1

Wait, were the protests in St. Louis destroying things before or after they strolled by that house? Do we know that for sure? I've seen a few vidoes and everyone seemed calm. 

As far as I know, most or nearly all of these protests are peaceful. There are not mobs rolling through the streets breaking shit. 

Take this for what it's worth. Apparently there were violent attacks not far from their community earlier that day.

https://twitter.com/BullyEsq/status/1277660976385601539

posted by justincredible

The wife needs to invest in some training.

posted by justincredible

Another murder in the CHOP.

https://twitter.com/BrandiKruse/status/1277635123110768640

So two black kids shot (one dead) inside the CHOP set up because black lives matter.

This was the Seattle mayor, less than 3 weeks ago.

https://twitter.com/MayorJenny/status/1271225850160009216

posted by ptown_trojans_1

Wait, were the protests in St. Louis destroying things before or after they strolled by that house? Do we know that for sure? I've seen a few vidoes and everyone seemed calm. 

As far as I know, most or nearly all of these protests are peaceful. There are not mobs rolling through the streets breaking shit. 

They were not. The neighbors houses were not destroyed or vandalized. Could they have been, sure. But these inbreds didn’t go so what they did because the protestors were out there destroying their neighbors houses or causing any sort of violence to their neighbors. They just wanted to be tough guys and go out and waive shiny guns in protestors faces .

posted by ptown_trojans_1

Wait, were the protests in St. Louis destroying things before or after they strolled by that house? Do we know that for sure? I've seen a few vidoes and everyone seemed calm. 

As far as I know, most or nearly all of these protests are peaceful. There are not mobs rolling through the streets breaking shit. 

Have you watched any TV the past 3 weeks?  Plenty of looting, rioting, vandalism and assaults going on .  

posted by Spock

posted by ptown_trojans_1

Wait, were the protests in St. Louis destroying things before or after they strolled by that house? Do we know that for sure? I've seen a few vidoes and everyone seemed calm. 

As far as I know, most or nearly all of these protests are peaceful. There are not mobs rolling through the streets breaking shit. 

Have you watched any TV the past 3 weeks?  Plenty of looting, rioting, vandalism and assaults going on .  

Okay show proof of houses being vandalized in their neighborhood by the protestors  

you can’t just say “over the last 3 weeks, BLM protestors have vandalized a lot of stuff! Therefore, these protestors in St. Louis were definitely going to destroy property!”

posted by SportsAndLady

posted by ptown_trojans_1

Wait, were the protests in St. Louis destroying things before or after they strolled by that house? Do we know that for sure? I've seen a few vidoes and everyone seemed calm. 

As far as I know, most or nearly all of these protests are peaceful. There are not mobs rolling through the streets breaking shit. 

They were not. The neighbors houses were not destroyed or vandalized. Could they have been, sure. But these inbreds didn’t go so what they did because the protestors were out there destroying their neighbors houses or causing any sort of violence to their neighbors. They just wanted to be tough guys and go out and waive shiny guns in protestors faces .

Or protect their own property (BTW is a baller status property).  When law abiding citizens see nothing but lawlessness being allowed to happen all over the country, "waiving shiny guns" seems like the appropriate response.

posted by Spock

posted by SportsAndLady

posted by ptown_trojans_1

Wait, were the protests in St. Louis destroying things before or after they strolled by that house? Do we know that for sure? I've seen a few vidoes and everyone seemed calm. 

As far as I know, most or nearly all of these protests are peaceful. There are not mobs rolling through the streets breaking shit. 

They were not. The neighbors houses were not destroyed or vandalized. Could they have been, sure. But these inbreds didn’t go so what they did because the protestors were out there destroying their neighbors houses or causing any sort of violence to their neighbors. They just wanted to be tough guys and go out and waive shiny guns in protestors faces .

Or protect their own property (BTW is a baller status property).  When law abiding citizens see nothing but lawlessness being allowed to happen all over the country, "waiving shiny guns" seems like the appropriate response.

The woman is most likely going to get in trouble for what she did. So you’re wrong. 

there’s nothing wrong with standing outside to protect your property against potential conflict. There IS something wrong with what she did and how she went about doing it. 

posted by SportsAndLady

posted by Spock

posted by ptown_trojans_1

Wait, were the protests in St. Louis destroying things before or after they strolled by that house? Do we know that for sure? I've seen a few vidoes and everyone seemed calm. 

As far as I know, most or nearly all of these protests are peaceful. There are not mobs rolling through the streets breaking shit. 

Have you watched any TV the past 3 weeks?  Plenty of looting, rioting, vandalism and assaults going on .  

Okay show proof of houses being vandalized in their neighborhood by the protestors  

you can’t just say “over the last 3 weeks, BLM protestors have vandalized a lot of stuff! Therefore, these protestors in St. Louis were definitely going to destroy property!”

The idiots were met with guns, their wasnt any vandalism.  They were breaking the law anyways without tearing up the place.  So there is no "proving" anything.

posted by SportsAndLady

posted by Spock

posted by SportsAndLady

posted by ptown_trojans_1

Wait, were the protests in St. Louis destroying things before or after they strolled by that house? Do we know that for sure? I've seen a few vidoes and everyone seemed calm. 

As far as I know, most or nearly all of these protests are peaceful. There are not mobs rolling through the streets breaking shit. 

They were not. The neighbors houses were not destroyed or vandalized. Could they have been, sure. But these inbreds didn’t go so what they did because the protestors were out there destroying their neighbors houses or causing any sort of violence to their neighbors. They just wanted to be tough guys and go out and waive shiny guns in protestors faces .

Or protect their own property (BTW is a baller status property).  When law abiding citizens see nothing but lawlessness being allowed to happen all over the country, "waiving shiny guns" seems like the appropriate response.

The woman is most likely going to get in trouble for what she did. So you’re wrong. 

there’s nothing wrong with standing outside to protect your property against potential conflict. There IS something wrong with what she did and how she went about doing it. 

I have read multiple things today that dont agree with you.  She wont be charged.