Progressives, part 3...

Home Forums Politics

iclfan2

Reppin' the 330/216/843

Fri, Mar 25, 2022 9:25 AM

Liberals bending over backwards to pretend they don’t know how to define a woman is not the winning message they think it is. Only lunatics refer to mothers as “birthing people”. 

ptown_trojans_1

Moderator

Fri, Mar 25, 2022 9:45 AM
posted by iclfan2

Liberals bending over backwards to pretend they don’t know how to define a woman is not the winning message they think it is. Only lunatics refer to mothers as “birthing people”. 

Birthing people is a dumb argument. But, it does seem like everyone is confusing sex and gender. They are different. 

queencitybuckeye

Senior Member

Fri, Mar 25, 2022 11:29 AM
posted by ptown_trojans_1

Birthing people is a dumb argument. But, it does seem like everyone is confusing sex and gender. They are different. 

Correct, and people should live how they wish. However, participation in sports should be based on sex, not gender. I'm tired of hearing about how wonderful it is that the 400th best person at a sporting event can "transition" and take a spot from a woman with far more talent but with the natural disparity in physical attributes.

gut

Senior Member

Fri, Mar 25, 2022 12:12 PM
posted by iclfan2

Liberals bending over backwards to pretend they don’t know how to define a woman is not the winning message they think it is. 

It's pretty ridiculous watching Jackson dodge some of these questions.  Sex and gender is, I think, a pretty pertinent question to ask a SCOTUS nominee, and her refusal to answer almost borders on disqualification.

justincredible

Honorable Admin

Fri, Mar 25, 2022 12:28 PM

I'm no biologist, but...


ptown_trojans_1

Moderator

Fri, Mar 25, 2022 12:58 PM
posted by gut

It's pretty ridiculous watching Jackson dodge some of these questions.  Sex and gender is, I think, a pretty pertinent question to ask a SCOTUS nominee, and her refusal to answer almost borders on disqualification.

Every single nominee dodges questions. Always have, and most likely always will. Each opposing side always says they dodged questions. 

ptown_trojans_1

Moderator

Fri, Mar 25, 2022 12:59 PM
posted by queencitybuckeye

Correct, and people should live how they wish. However, participation in sports should be based on sex, not gender. I'm tired of hearing about how wonderful it is that the 400th best person at a sporting event can "transition" and take a spot from a woman with far more talent but with the natural disparity in physical attributes.

I'd say there are a lot of assumptions built into your statement. It's a complicated issue there usually gets boiled down to political talking points. I think the governor of Utah's veto statement the other day was a pretty good way to address the issue. 

queencitybuckeye

Senior Member

Fri, Mar 25, 2022 1:00 PM
posted by ptown_trojans_1

I'd say there are a lot of assumptions built into your statement. It's a complicated issue there usually gets boiled down to political talking points. I think the governor of Utah's veto statement the other day was a pretty good way to address the issue. 

What was I "assuming"?

ptown_trojans_1

Moderator

Fri, Mar 25, 2022 1:05 PM
posted by queencitybuckeye

What was I "assuming"?

Assuming the person transitioned to improve their position in sports. You implied that in your post. 

gut

Senior Member

Fri, Mar 25, 2022 1:07 PM
posted by ptown_trojans_1

Every single nominee dodges questions. Always have, and most likely always will. Each opposing side always says they dodged questions. 

No one has ever so blatantly dodged a question that simple and relevant.

ptown_trojans_1

Moderator

Fri, Mar 25, 2022 1:09 PM
posted by gut

No one has ever so blatantly dodged a question that simple and relevant.

Oh I'm sure some others have recently. Come on.

queencitybuckeye

Senior Member

Fri, Mar 25, 2022 1:17 PM
posted by ptown_trojans_1

Assuming the person transitioned to improve their position in sports. You implied that in your post. 

The implication is yours, not mine. I don't care why she transitioned, the reasons for doing so have nothing to do with a biological male participating in women's sports being unfair to biological women.

QuakerOats

Senior Member

Fri, Mar 25, 2022 1:18 PM
posted by ptown_trojans_1

I'd say there are a lot of assumptions built into your statement. It's a complicated issue there usually gets boiled down to political talking points. I think the governor of Utah's veto statement the other day was a pretty good way to address the issue. 



It's not complicated. 

Heretic

Son of the Sun

Fri, Mar 25, 2022 1:39 PM
posted by queencitybuckeye

Correct, and people should live how they wish. However, participation in sports should be based on sex, not gender. I'm tired of hearing about how wonderful it is that the 400th best person at a sporting event can "transition" and take a spot from a woman with far more talent but with the natural disparity in physical attributes.

Truth -- with no built-in assumptions that I saw, either. I'd say that anyone making the assumption dude became a lady in order to get good at sports is on about the same intellectual level as the people playing the social media outrage card and acting like anyone with any issue to any of this is all about the transphobia. When it comes to athletics, high-level men have strength and speed advantages over high-level women, which was shown when a guy who was college-level, but not exceptional (ranked in the 400s, as I recall) was able to do things like, oh, beat Olympic-tier athletes after transitioning.

Which turns things into an awkward situation where it's obvious that Thomas' current athletic success is determined by the physicality developed when a man while going up against those who didn't exist under those terms. I mean, are female athletes just supposed to work their asses off and hope that the roulette wheel doesn't go against them and all their work means they won't get stuck behind someone who, a couple years ago, wouldn't even be in a woman's race? Or just let everything go and pump themselves up on more steroids than the East Germans back in the day, so they can compete on equal footing?

geeblock

Member

Fri, Mar 25, 2022 2:16 PM

here are the times for reference.  


1650

Lia pre-transition: 14:54.765

Lia post-transition: 15:59.71 (lost 65 seconds)

Male record: 14:12.08 (Kieran Smith)

Female record: 15:03:31 (Katie Ledecky)

She was 40 seconds behind the male record, now she is 56 behind the female

500

Lia's best pre-transition, 4:18:72

Lia's current, 4:34:06

Female record (Katie Ledecky), 4:24:06

Male record (Kieran Smith), 4:06:32

200

Prior to transition 1:39.31

Male record, 1:29.15

After transition 1:41.93

Female record of 1:39.10

jmog

Senior Member

Fri, Mar 25, 2022 3:13 PM
posted by geeblock

here are the times for reference.  


1650

Lia pre-transition: 14:54.765

Lia post-transition: 15:59.71 (lost 65 seconds)

Male record: 14:12.08 (Kieran Smith)

Female record: 15:03:31 (Katie Ledecky)

She was 40 seconds behind the male record, now she is 56 behind the female

500

Lia's best pre-transition, 4:18:72

Lia's current, 4:34:06

Female record (Katie Ledecky), 4:24:06

Male record (Kieran Smith), 4:06:32

200

Prior to transition 1:39.31

Male record, 1:29.15

After transition 1:41.93

Female record of 1:39.10

Comparing world records is disingenuous, compare to NCAA records and current season’s bests as that is the level she was swimming at.


Biologically she has an advantage over every woman she swam against this year at the NCAA level. 


Dr Winston O'Boogie

Senior Member

Fri, Mar 25, 2022 4:07 PM
posted by geeblock

here are the times for reference.  


1650

Lia pre-transition: 14:54.765

Lia post-transition: 15:59.71 (lost 65 seconds)

Male record: 14:12.08 (Kieran Smith)

Female record: 15:03:31 (Katie Ledecky)

She was 40 seconds behind the male record, now she is 56 behind the female

500

Lia's best pre-transition, 4:18:72

Lia's current, 4:34:06

Female record (Katie Ledecky), 4:24:06

Male record (Kieran Smith), 4:06:32

200

Prior to transition 1:39.31

Male record, 1:29.15

After transition 1:41.93

Female record of 1:39.10

This is like a male track athlete transitioning and winning womens track events and justifying it by saying she still isn’t as fast as Jackie Joyner.


jmog

Senior Member

Fri, Mar 25, 2022 5:03 PM
posted by Dr Winston O'Boogie

This is like a male track athlete transitioning and winning womens track events and justifying it by saying she still isn’t as fast as Jackie Joyner.


Exactly, Geeblock fails again  


geeblock

Member

Fri, Mar 25, 2022 5:55 PM
posted by jmog

Exactly, Geeblock fails again  


Lol I wasn’t trying to say anything just providing data for you lol Jesus 


jmog

Senior Member

Fri, Mar 25, 2022 7:39 PM
posted by geeblock

Lol I wasn’t trying to say anything just providing data for you lol Jesus 


Sure…🤪


Automatik

Senior Member

Fri, Mar 25, 2022 9:39 PM

Is this the peak coverage/attention of “women’s” swimming? Y’all are in DEEP.

queencitybuckeye

Senior Member

Sat, Mar 26, 2022 7:25 AM
posted by Automatik

Is this the peak coverage/attention of “women’s” swimming? Y’all are in DEEP.

Perhaps there's a larger issue in play.

geeblock

Member

Sat, Mar 26, 2022 9:32 AM
posted by jmog

Sure…🤪


Dude it’s a discussion board not an argument board. Stop trying to argue about everything. How can u have a discussion if you hadn’t seen the times. I hadn’t seen them till the day before yesterday and I assumed many hadn’t. I don’t disagree with what others have already stated on this board, but don’t feel strongly about it as far as my opinion goes on the situation. 


queencitybuckeye

Senior Member

Sat, Mar 26, 2022 9:47 AM

Thanks for the information. It would be interesting to see what the times look like for those who she is currently competing against in addition to the all-time best.

gut

Senior Member

Sat, Mar 26, 2022 9:50 AM

Everyone hatin' when it's so obvious a non-aerodynamic penis will slow you down in the water.