Archive

2011 Cleveland Cavalier Offseason/Draft

  • thedynasty1998
    hoops23;782604 wrote:Please don't ruin his internet cred, it's all he has.

    Thanks.

    I've never told a blatant lie, so I'm good.
  • wildcats20
    thedynasty1998;782626 wrote:I've never told a blatant lie, so I'm good.

    You said it wasn't worth discussing. Yet you still are talking about it.
  • like_that
    thedynasty1998;782626 wrote:I've never told a blatant lie, so I'm good.

    Just like you said you have never threatened anyone on this message board... lol.


    Just like you said you are not a troll, yet you admitted to purposely trying to get under people's skins.
  • KR1245
    thedynasty1998;782622 wrote:I'm sure the Cavs called every team and inquired about anyone that wouldnhave improved the team. Windhorst said that NO said Paul wasn't available. They probably then asked about other available players.

    I started this discussion saying it was never a reality and then hoops said it was factual that the Cavs made an offer and even went as far as told me to do a google search. It isn't factual and the most relevant article we can find is a Q and A with a beat writer.

    I understand what you're saying but the Cavs reached out to the Hornets regarding Paul. How many times in pro sports have we heard an owner or GM say that a player wasnt on the trading block and then a few weeks later he gets traded? I'm going to leave it at this but I highly doubt that the Cavs called the Hornets without an offer on the table.

    N.O. fired their GM because the guy wasnt squashing the rumors that he was taking calls regarding CP3. He was obviously open to deals or else he wouldnt have been fired. It seems like the circumstantial evidence is there.
  • GOONx19
    thedynasty1998;782626 wrote:I've never told a blatant lie, so I'm good.

    LOL. Every human being on this planet has told hundreds of blatant lies in their lives.
  • BR1986FB
    thedynasty1998;782337 wrote:Okay are we throwing out rumors similar to the Chris Paul to Cleveland rumors? No way Okie City trades him for a draft pick unless it's the 1st and the 4th.

    "We?" Do you have a mouse in your pocket or something? Try READING next time. The sports talk guys on R&R brought this up (not MY rumor) and they had callers calling in about whether they'd do it. Some FOOL called in and said he'd actually give up the #1 AND 4 for Westbrook. smh
  • BR1986FB
    wildcats20;782366 wrote:lol No I'm saying that Westbrook is a 2 playing the 1.

    This was brought up also in the discussion re a trade for Westbrook but most agreed he isn't a good enough outside shooter to be a #2.
  • KR1245
    BR1986FB;782863 wrote:"We?" Do you have a mouse in your pocket or something? Try READING next time. The sports talk guys on R&R brought this up (not MY rumor) and they had callers calling in about whether they'd do it. Some FOOL called in and said he'd actually give up the #1 AND 4 for Westbrook. smh

    Theres a thread over on RCF about the same thing, it was obviously mentioned somewhere

    Dynasty doesnt feel that it is appropriate for fans to talk about such rumors.
  • BR1986FB
    robj55;782465 wrote:Then why do they have to attack someone who has a differing opinion, I feel a lot of them are very insecure about the whole thing, way too sensitive.

    I'm going to give you somewhat of a "pass" because you've only been on here about 6 months because you don't seem too familiar with their history. The reason SQ & Dynasty get slammed is because of their history. Dynasty has been an habitual troll on Cavs threads and will throw out the "contrarian" opinion to start shit. A lot of times I think he does it whether he believes it or not. Sometimes he says valid stuff, most times NOT. You're giving him WAY too much credit for his "knowledge."

    SQ, on the other hand, is a flat out joke. Dude thinks he is the "king" of all things basketball. Thinks he knows more than anyone and is NEVER wrong. Anyone who doesn't agree with the "king" is a "peon", "peasant" or "idiot."

    Now I said we'd give you a "pass" for maybe not knowing these guys' past history but I WOULD expect you to side with them being a CHeat/Lebron sympathizer.
  • thedynasty1998
    BR1986FB;782880 wrote:I'm going to give you somewhat of a "pass" because you've only been on here about 6 months because you don't seem too familiar with their history. The reason SQ & Dynasty get slammed is because of their history. Dynasty has been an habitual troll on Cavs threads and will throw out the "contrarian" opinion to start shit. A lot of times I think he does it whether he believes it or not. Sometimes he says valid stuff, most times NOT. You're giving him WAY too much credit for his "knowledge."

    SQ, on the other hand, is a flat out joke. Dude thinks he is the "king" of all things basketball. Thinks he knows more than anyone and is NEVER wrong. Anyone who doesn't agree with the "king" is a "peon", "peasant" or "idiot."

    Now I said we'd give you a "pass" for maybe not knowing these guys' past history but I WOULD expect you to side with them being a CHeat/Lebron sympathizer.

    What stuff have I ever said that wasn't a valid opinion? I said the Cavs wouldn't win the championship last year and everyone was up in arms. I said Lebron was leaving and I was called a troll. I don't like the Jamison trade and I don't know basketball. I thought Ferry was a horrible GM and I'm a troll.

    He'll I'm critical of Rondo and I'm called a troll. I would almost think the opposite would be true.

    All the simple minded people on here (there's really only a handful) just take over threads with their nonsense and immaturity and like to throw out "troll" every time there is a differing opinion.
  • Raw Dawgin' it
    thedynasty1998;782893 wrote:All the simple minded people on here (there's really only a handful) just take over threads with their nonsense and immaturity and like to throw out "troll" every time there is a differing opinion.

    Sounds like the pot calling the kettle black to me
  • BR1986FB
    Raw Dawgin' it;782899 wrote:Sounds like the pot calling the kettle black to me

    Actually sounds like something SQ would say in a more refined way.
  • Commander of Awesome
    Jester;782588 wrote:I usually try not to get into shit like this, but dynasty, you look like a douche right now.

    lmao /thread.
    wildcats20;782641 wrote:You said it wasn't worth discussing. Yet you still are talking about it.
    Typical of his posting nature. loldynastypwned
    thedynasty1998;782893 wrote:What stuff have I ever said that wasn't a valid opinion? I said the Cavs wouldn't win the championship last year and everyone was up in arms. I said Lebron was leaving and I was called a troll. I don't like the Jamison trade and I don't know basketball. I thought Ferry was a horrible GM and I'm a troll.

    Yeah you would come in the Cavs threads after they just rolled in the first round squaking that "The Cavs weren't going to win" with nothing to back it up. It would be like me going onto a Mavs message board trying to rain on their parade screaming "lol 2006 All over again! LMAO MAvs are going to get burned again! lolmavs suck lol. LMAO at you trying to act innocent, you're such a POS. Looking forward for your threatening PMs to start raining in. I can't wait to see you crying on Taylor's shoulder because you're getting pwned so hard on here. LMAO hoops, KR, like_that, BR, Jester, and even Wildcats have pwned you. I can't believe you're still talking. Its pathetic.
  • BR1986FB
    Commander of Awesome;782906 wrote:


    Yeah you would come in the Cavs threads after they just rolled in the first round squaking that "The Cavs weren't going to win" with nothing to back it up. It would be like me going onto a Mavs message board trying to rain on their parade screaming "lol 2006 All over again! LMAO MAvs are going to get burned again! lolmavs suck lol. LMAO at you trying to act innocent, you're such a POS. Looking forward for your threatening PMs to start raining in. I can't wait to see you crying on Taylor's shoulder because you're getting pwned so hard on here. LMAO hoops, KR, like_that, BR, Jester, and even Wildcats have pwned you. I can't believe you're still talking. Its pathetic.

    I really don't have an issue with a differing opinion but I HATE when people dive bomb a thread just to stir shit up. As an example I have no issue with Steelers fans coming on a Browns thread to talk FOOTBALL but if they are popping in just to stir it up, then fuck em.

    I make a comment about a potential trade discussion that was talked about on Cleveland sports talk radio, by a guy who is STILL well connected in the league (Michael Reghi) and dynasty jumps in and dismisses it as hogwash. It's highly possible the trade never happens but just because the proverbial "tree" falls in the woods with nobody around doesn't mean the trade talk didn't happen.
  • thedynasty1998
    BR1986FB;782909 wrote:I really don't have an issue with a differing opinion but I HATE when people dive bomb a thread just to stir shit up. As an example I have no issue with Steelers fans coming on a Browns thread to talk FOOTBALL but if they are popping in just to stir it up, then fuck em.

    I make a comment about a potential trade discussion that was talked about on Cleveland sports talk radio, by a guy who is STILL well connected in the league (Michael Reghi) and dynasty jumps in and dismisses it as hogwash. It's highly possible the trade never happens but just because the proverbial "tree" falls in the woods with nobody around doesn't mean the trade talk didn't happen.

    Your radio guy is pathetic if he really believed Westbrook to Cleveland had any chance at all.
  • BR1986FB
    thedynasty1998;782950 wrote:Your radio guy is pathetic if he really believed Westbrook to Cleveland had any chance at all.

    It sounds like Cleveland was the one reaching out to OKC and I'd hardly call Reghi "pathetic." You'd probably get along with him swimmingly because he often comes across as a pompous "know it all." You'd have THAT in common. And I'm sure that someone like Reghi, who has been around the league for years, appreciates your input and "superior" NBA "intellect." :rolleyes:

    And, of course, you prove my previous post chiming in with this shit.
  • Commander of Awesome
    BR1986FB;782969 wrote:It sounds like Cleveland was the one reaching out to OKC and I'd hardly call Reghi "pathetic." You'd probably get along with him swimmingly because he often comes across as a pompous "know it all." You'd have THAT in common. And I'm sure that someone like Reghi, who has been around the league for years, appreciates your input and "superior" NBA "intellect." :rolleyes:

    And, of course, you prove my previous post chiming in with this shit.

    LMAO, pwned. Great points too.
  • wes_mantooth
    BR1986FB;782969 wrote:It sounds like Cleveland was the one reaching out to OKC and I'd hardly call Reghi "pathetic." You'd probably get along with him swimmingly because he often comes across as a pompous "know it all." You'd have THAT in common. And I'm sure that someone like Reghi, who has been around the league for years, appreciates your input and "superior" NBA "intellect." :rolleyes:

    And, of course, you prove my previous post chiming in with this shit.

    "bring it strong"!!!
  • BR1986FB
    wes_mantooth;782983 wrote:"bring it strong"!!!

    "Get off my air you ignorant ass !!!"
  • lhslep134
    hoops23;782427 wrote: IMO, with Green, OKC makes it a series with Dallas.

    Nope, not at all. The reason they traded Green was to get playing time for Harden.

    With Green in the lineup, who do you sit between Ibaka, Collison, WB, Harden, Durant?
  • wildcats20
    BR1986FB;782864 wrote:This was brought up also in the discussion re a trade for Westbrook but most agreed he isn't a good enough outside shooter to be a #2.
    Yeah, but he can develop an outside shot. I'm not sure he can develop a PG game.

    Although, Magic thinks he can.
  • BR1986FB
    wildcats20;782989 wrote:Yeah, but he can develop an outside shot.
    .

    Yeah, that was also discussed in that Jordan didn't have the best outside game in his early years. Not comparing Westbrook to Jordan but I think you get my point.
  • wildcats20
    BR1986FB;782991 wrote:Yeah, that was also discussed in that Jordan didn't have the best outside game in his early years. Not comparing Westbrook to Jordan but I think you get my point.

    Absolutely.

    I mean look at what Bron is doing with his jumper now. It was broke as I am when he first came in the League and now it's becoming one of the more consistent ones.
  • Commander of Awesome
    wildcats20;782994 wrote:Absolutely.

    I mean look at what Bron is doing with his jumper now. It was broke as I am when he first came in the League and now it's becoming one of the more consistent ones.

    Same could be said for Jason Kidd. He had ZERO jump shot when he came into the league.
  • lhslep134
    BR1986FB;782909 wrote:
    I make a comment about a potential trade discussion that was talked about on Cleveland sports talk radio, by a guy who is STILL well connected in the league (Michael Reghi) and dynasty jumps in and dismisses it as hogwash. .


    So it's YOUR fault I had to read 100 posts of stupid banter. Thanks ;)