Archive

BCS talk

  • Terry_Tate
    Oversigning Bowl Part 2 is official. Awesome.
  • Crimson streak
    ccrunner609;1001806 wrote:+1 system:

    LSU/Stanford
    OSU/Bama

    Winners play........wouldnt that be nice? CFB is stupid.

    That would be so damn awesome
  • WebFire
    Zombaypirate;1001703 wrote:What is the reasoning (or lack thereof) of selecting Michigan over Michigan St who won their side of the Big Ten and actually made it to the Big Ten championship game?
    You have to be in the top 14 for an at-large bid. MSU is 17, UM 13.
  • WebFire
    ccrunner609;1001806 wrote:+1 system:

    LSU/Stanford
    OSU/Bama

    Winners play........wouldnt that be nice? CFB is stupid.
    So you saw Herbie talking?
  • Cleveland Buck
    As I suspected, Oklahoma didn't fall out of the top 14. I just can't believe they didn't get picked and Virginia Tech did. That means there is something other than money behind that decision.
  • gorocks99
    Michigan-Va Tech in New Orleans
  • ts1227
    Herbie is pissed about the VT pick
  • Cleveland Buck
    Herbstreit is still choking down the SEC dick May passed over to him.
  • GoJPM!
    Sugar Bowl following the $$$$$$$$$$. Yeah, Va Tech is a bit of joke but their fans travel so.......
  • WebFire
    ccrunner609;1001849 wrote:WV and Clemson......what a snoozer.
    Yeah that's awful.
  • ptown_trojans_1
    What a joke the system is.
    The Sugar Bowl should be KSU vs. Boise. 2 Top 10 teams.
    Instead we get a team that didn't make their conference title game and a team that got killed in its.
    Michigan does not deserve a BCS game.

    I officially hate the system and now am a loyal playoff proponent.
  • GoJPM!
    A lot better at-large teams than Va Tech.
  • Cleveland Buck
    ptown_trojans_1;1001854 wrote:What a joke the system is.
    The Sugar Bowl should be KSU vs. Boise. 2 Top 10 teams.
    Instead we get a team that didn't make their conference title game and a team that got killed in its.
    Michigan does not deserve a BCS game.

    I officially hate the system and now am a loyal playoff proponent.
    You would be the only one watching a KSU/Boise bowl game. In fact, putting on bowls that get those kind of ratings would be the fastest way to a playoff.
  • ts1227
    Cleveland Buck;1001840 wrote:Herbstreit is still choking down the SEC dick May passed over to him.
    He said he'd rather see a seeded plus 1 than a straight up rematch, and never mentioned anything SEC in tearing apart VT.
    That's some serious SEC dick sucking :huh:
  • ptown_trojans_1
    Cleveland Buck;1001859 wrote:You would be the only one watching a KSU/Boise bowl game. In fact, putting on bowls that get those kind of ratings would be the fastest way to a playoff.
    Sure, I'd still take RGIII over Michigan and VT.
    How about a Baylor vs. Boise game? RGIII vs Kellon Moore?

    What a joke.
  • Mulva
    I think Michigan is more deserving than Kansas State, but Boise State and Kansas State are both more deserving than Virginia Tech.
  • ohiobucks1
    Fuck this system. I love hearing fans say the SEC has won 6 straight thus Alabama should get in. Well how can anybody break that streak if they dont give them a chance from day 1?
  • ptown_trojans_1
    Mulva;1001875 wrote:I think Michigan is more deserving than Kansas State, but Boise State and Kansas State are both more deserving than Virginia Tech.
    Based on what?
    KSU is in the top 10, Michigan is not.
  • enigmaax
    ccrunner609;1001806 wrote:+1 system:

    LSU/Stanford
    OSU/Bama

    Winners play........wouldnt that be nice? CFB is stupid.
    You're cool with this, even though Stanford is getting in over Oregon, who destroyed them and won their conference? Does the selection process work or not?
  • Crimson streak
    enigmaax;1001881 wrote:You're cool with this, even though Stanford is getting in over Oregon, who destroyed them and won their conference? Does the selection process work or not?

    Oregon lost twice though and Stanford only once
  • Mulva
    ptown_trojans_1;1001880 wrote:Based on what?
    KSU is in the top 10, Michigan is not.
    More impressive resume in my opinion. I'd take wins over Nebraska and Notre Dame over Baylor. Kansas State's 2nd most impressive win is 7-5 Texas (or Missouri), and Oklahoma beat them by 41 points. Bad losses really hurt you in my book.

    Neither one is a great resume, but I'd go with UM.
  • chippy10
    I love how suckeye fans are pissed about the title game and michigan getting a BCS game get over it. The SEC has won the last four title games and suckeyes are *0-10 against them. sanctions. LSU and Bama best two teams in the country. Michigan played the schedule if it wasnt for a getting fucked at Iowa would been 11-1 team.
  • dave
    Surprised Baylor got left out after being eligible. You could really market RGIII vs Denard
  • trep14
    Cleveland Buck;1001859 wrote:You would be the only one watching a KSU/Boise bowl game. In fact, putting on bowls that get those kind of ratings would be the fastest way to a playoff.
    I would absolutely tune in to watch Boise play a bowl game. They are an exciting team to watch.
  • Zombaypirate
    WebFire;1001814 wrote:You have to be in the top 14 for an at-large bid. MSU is 17, UM 13.

    LOL how convienent. Mich St crushed Mich and is a superior team to them. Teams might want to consider turning down their conference championship games, if you lose you are screwed.

    FBS has offically become a total joke.