Archive

BCS talk

  • cats gone wild
    If you watched the BCS countdown show today and plus look at others calculations, then........
    Lets just say, I would listen to them over you. I can see where you are coming from but the computers are hurting Ark no matter what.
  • Al Bundy
    cats gone wild;982839 wrote:Looks like LSU will still make SEC title/title game even if they lose to Ark. After alot of figuring out, LSU looks to be in a great position no matter what. Unless they get beat bad, which wont happen.
    LSU would also have to hope that Bama doesn't get upset, or they would be out of title game.
  • cats gone wild
    Have you seen AUB this year. I dont think we have to worry about Bama getting beat.
  • FatHobbit
    cats gone wild;983915 wrote:Have you seen AUB this year. I dont think we have to worry about Bama getting beat.
    There were a few teams last Saturday that didn't have anything to worry about either.
  • dwccrew
    FatHobbit;983932 wrote:There were a few teams last Saturday that didn't have anything to worry about either.
    Yeah, but every other conferences bad teams would be SEC East champs. The SEC is terrible outside of 3 teams. Auburn is garbage and might not win any games in the Big 12 except maybe against Kansas, but probably not.
  • cats gone wild
    dwccrew;984165 wrote:Yeah, but every other conferences bad teams would be SEC East champs. The SEC is terrible outside of 3 teams. Auburn is garbage and might not win any games in the Big 12 except maybe against Kansas, but probably not.
    Wait a minute, you just said UGA is one of the SEC's top 3 teams on another post. Try backing out of that.
  • sleeper
    dwccrew;984165 wrote:Yeah, but every other conferences bad teams would be SEC East champs. The SEC is terrible outside of 3 teams. Auburn is garbage and might not win any games in the Big 12 except maybe against Kansas, but probably not.
    Finally someone else besides me gets it. I win, again.
  • cats gone wild
    Maybe its because dwccrew is sleeper???
  • superman
    cats gone wild;983915 wrote:Have you seen AUB this year. I dont think we have to worry about Bama getting beat.
    Says the idiot who has cited Auburn as a quality win for LSU several times this year.
  • dwccrew
    cats gone wild;984175 wrote:Wait a minute, you just said UGA is one of the SEC's top 3 teams on another post. Try backing out of that.
    Yeah, one of the SEC's 3 best teams. Every other conferences 8th best team. Derp
    superman;984213 wrote:Says the idiot who has cited Auburn as a quality win for LSU several times this year.
    He has to since LSU really only has one quality win and that was a fluke over Bama.
  • karen lotz
    dwccrew;984357 wrote:Yeah, one of the SEC's 3 best teams. Every other conferences 8th best team. Derp



    He has to since LSU really only has one quality win and that was a fluke over Bama.

    Oregon wasn't a quality win? If Bama and Oregon aren't quality wins, no team in the country has any quality wins.
  • dwccrew
    karen lotz;984450 wrote:Oregon wasn't a quality win? If Bama and Oregon aren't quality wins, no team in the country has any quality wins.
    I counted Bama, even though it was a fluke win.
  • GOONx19
    cats gone wild;983015 wrote:If you watched the BCS countdown show today and plus look at others calculations, then........
    Lets just say, I would listen to them over you. I can see where you are coming from but the computers are hurting Ark no matter what.
    The computers currently have Arkansas 4th. Would that not improve if they won Saturday?
  • cats gone wild
    dwccrew;984357 wrote:Yeah, one of the SEC's 3 best teams. Every other conferences 8th best team. Derp



    He has to since LSU really only has one quality win and that was a fluke over Bama.
    Do you wanna compare LSU's wins to anyone else in the country? Yeah, thats what I thought. And you are a complete joke if you think LSU is at the bottom of other conferences and 4th or farther down the list in the SEC. I guess the WHOLE country is clueless in your eyes. Do you want to make any bet for the LSU/ARK game? You truly are sleeper with another name.
  • cats gone wild
    GOONx19;984461 wrote:The computers currently have Arkansas 4th. Would that not improve if they won Saturday?
    You can do your own research or watch ESPN. Its not hard to find.
  • GOONx19
    Or you could just type it yourself in the amount of time it took you to reply to that post. I don't care enough about average football teams to do it myself. Doucher.
  • dwccrew
    cats gone wild;984574 wrote:Do you wanna compare LSU's wins to anyone else in the country? Yeah, thats what I thought. And you are a complete joke if you think LSU is at the bottom of other conferences and 4th or farther down the list in the SEC. I guess the WHOLE country is clueless in your eyes. Do you want to make any bet for the LSU/ARK game? You truly are sleeper with another name.
    You truly are a troll puppet who's strings are very easy to pull.
  • Mulva
    Southern Miss will beat Houston in the C-USA championship and Boise State will make the BCS.
  • enigmaax
    Mulva;988326 wrote:Southern Miss will beat Houston in the C-USA championship and Boise State will make the BCS.
    You think TCU is going to get beat, Boise is going to get to #4 or Boise is going to get an at-large bid?
  • Azubuike24
    Good point. Now that I think about it, TCU is the conference champion, which will preclude Boise from getting the non-AQ "top BCS ranking" spot. This will go to Houston if they beat Southern Mississippi and if they lose, it would throw it out the window as no non-AQ champion will finish in the top 14 of the BCS standings.

    Could the BCS still take Boise since they are co-champion (even though they lost head to head)?
  • enigmaax
    Azubuike24;988479 wrote:Could the BCS still take Boise since they are co-champion (even though they lost head to head)?
    Haven't found any confirmation on this, but I don't know why the MWC would name TCU its champion on a head-to-head tiebreaker when it would mean losing out on BCS money for the conference. I have no doubt that Boise would go to a BCS bowl in that case and TCU would still go to the regular #1 MWC bowl.
  • Azubuike24
    Credibility of the conference if TCU won on the Blue Turf...then again, it's the BCS, and it's big money for the MWC if one of their members gets a bid.
  • lhslep134
    enigmaax;988486 wrote:Haven't found any confirmation on this, but I don't know why the MWC would name TCU its champion on a head-to-head tiebreaker when it would mean losing out on BCS money for the conference.
    Found this from 2003 because I was wondering the same thing but I can't vouch that it's up-to-date. http://graphics.fansonly.com/photos/schools/mwc/genrel/auto_pdf/Football.pdf

    Head-to-head is the tiebreaker.
  • enigmaax
    lhslep134;988534 wrote:Found this from 2003 because I was wondering the same thing but I can't vouch that it's up-to-date. http://graphics.fansonly.com/photos/schools/mwc/genrel/auto_pdf/Football.pdf

    Head-to-head is the tiebreaker.
    But that is for the normal bowl selection. They don't have a reason to break the tie for BCS purposes. TCU goes to the #1 MWC bowl whether Boise goes to the BCS or not. I just don't think the MWC would say, "well, TCU wins the tiebreaker, so they are our BCS candidate" when they won't be eligible. I believe they'd call it a tie, expect Boise to get the BCS autobid and TCU would still get its rightful reward in the #1 MWC bowl (I don't even know what that is anymore).

    None of it is likely since TCU probably is going to have little trouble with UNLV. But there would be no reason to use a tiebreaker in that scenario since doing so/not doing so doesn't affect TCU's bowl.
  • cats gone wild
    Clemson does the normal Clemson choke job. Hyped again, but fail for another season.