How Much Trouble Is OSU and Tressel in Now?!

• krambman

  

  Kirk Herbstreit made a valid point of Cowherd earlier today. He said that it's possible that someone like Tressel hears about things like this all the time and that when he was told about it that he may have investigated it by telling someone in compliance or by simply going to any of the players that the source implicated to Tressel and asked them about it. If they denied it that may have been enough for him. There's eight months from April to December, so it is possible that he had been told about this and then forgot about it because they didn't believe it was true, or it's possible that if he was told and the facts weren't clear that no sort of report was filed anywhere.
• stroups

  

  Gee is a fucking boss, he is probably just going to sit there until the end, then whip his crank out and say "yahoo... suck on this"
• Automatik

  

  Wow I didn't look at any of this since last night.....now a full blown shit storm.
  
  I'm hoping the OSU big wigs come out and squash all of this.....but I'm not confident.
• krambman

  

  stroups;703455 wrote:Gee is a fucking boss, he is probably just going to sit there until the end, then whip his crank out and say "yahoo... suck on this"

  
  It's posts like this that make me wish Ohio Chatter had a Facebookesque "Like" button.
  
  
• vball10set

  I don't feel good about this--it's just a gut feeling, and I hope I'm terribly wrong!!!
• Automatik

  

  How will they have solid proof of this?
• ICEMAN59

  

  Automatik;703466 wrote:How will they have solid proof of this?

  
  Fairly easily, copies of emails or voice-mails between OSU officials (maybe Tress) and other parties acknowledging the incident prior to December of 2010.
• krambman

  

  Some gems from Twitter today:
  

  Multiple ESPN platforms are already asking what Jim Tressel's punishment should be. Real punishment would be having him replace Corso.

  Jim Tressel should just say they informed his DAD but he never knew anything about it.

  Your sweater vests and cordial demeanor never fooled me Jim Tressel, I always knew you were a cheater!

  Jim Delany just suspended Jim Tressel for the first half of Oho State’s spring game

  Jim Tressel's scheduled book signing tonite (7-9 pm) has been canceled. Oh man I'm already in line!

  Hey, Jim Tressel.... just tell 'em your daddy did it.

  So the Jim Tressel news conference will be at the Jack Nicklaus Museum on campus. Wonder if the coach gets a mulligan.

  A presser 24 hours after the story breaks? Kirk Ferentz thinks you're being hasty.

  About Time Jim Tressel Got Into Trouble: Wearing a sweater vest doesn't make you an honorable person.

  If Jim Tressel resigns at this press conference tonight, I hope he shows up in an Oregon hat & Auburn shirt...selective ncaa enforcement

• Automatik

  

  ICEMAN59;703477 wrote:Fairly easily, copies of emails or voice-mails between OSU officials (maybe Tress) and other parties acknowledging the incident prior to December of 2010.

  
  Yes, but wouldn't you come with the proof when you drop the article?
• Jawbreaker

  Automatik;703481 wrote:Yes, but wouldn't you come with the proof during when you drop the article?

  
  Not if you are trying to trap someone in a lie.
• krambman

  

  Automatik;703481 wrote:Yes, but wouldn't you come with the proof during when you drop the article?

  
  Exactly! If this source had hard proof would they have mentioned it in the article? It makes sense that if the source has emails or recorded conversations that Yahoo! would have mentioned that. Something like "An anonymous source has emails proving that Tressel knew in April . . ."
  
  Also, emails don't necessarily mean much in a situation like this. Anyone could make fake emails. The NCAA has no subpoena power, so there's no way for them to get confirmation from the school or from an internet provider or email host to prove that they are legitimate unless Ohio State willingly volunteers that info.
• vball10set

  http://www.toledoblade.com/Ohio-State/2011/03/08/Buckeyes-AD-on-campus.html
• WebFire

  Snakeoil!
• like_that

  

  Automatik;703481 wrote:Yes, but wouldn't you come with the proof during when you drop the article?

  krambman;703489 wrote:Exactly! If this source had hard proof would they have mentioned it in the article? It makes sense that if the source has emails or recorded conversations that Yahoo! would have mentioned that. Something like "An anonymous source has emails proving that Tressel knew in April . . ."
  
  Also, emails don't necessarily mean much in a situation like this. Anyone could make fake emails. The NCAA has no subpoena power, so there's no way for them to get confirmation from the school or from an internet provider or email host to prove that they are legitimate unless Ohio State willingly volunteers that info.

  
  Are you kidding me? The media these days has no integrity, especially ESPN. They will report anything even if they overhear a conversation from two grandmas.
• vball10set

  WebFire;703496 wrote:Snakeoil!

  
  RichRod? he's already gone!!!
• se-alum

  

  Gee will probably be there to announce the Defamation suit against Wetzel & Robinson.
• ICEMAN59

  

  Jawbreaker;703487 wrote:Not if you are trying to trap someone in a lie.

  
  Nail on the head . . . why would Yahoo put all their cards on the table . . . it's a better story if you wait to let OSU respond, then lay it all out there.
• OneBuckeye

  

  ICEMAN59;703505 wrote:Nail on the head . . . why would Yahoo put all their cards on the table . . . it's a better story if you wait to let OSU respond, then lay it all out there.

  
  Not really. If you have the evidence you already have the lie. What is the point of further trying to embarass the university or let it admit guilt when you have all the evidence? Does not make sense, if they had more they would have came with it to begin with. Now that means something could surface quickly because of the first article, in that case the game is changed.
• Jawbreaker

  OneBuckeye;703508 wrote:Not really. If you have the evidence you already have the lie. What is the point of further trying to embarass the university or let it admit guilt when you have all the evidence? Does not make sense, if they had more they would have came with it to begin with. Now that means something could surface quickly because of the first article, in that case the game is changed.

  You are giving Yahoo too much credit.
• thedynasty1998

  

  ICEMAN59;703505 wrote:Nail on the head . . . why would Yahoo put all their cards on the table . . . it's a better story if you wait to let OSU respond, then lay it all out there.

  
  Exactly. It just creates more speculation. You don't think Yahoo is just waiting for their follow up story? Every news sources across the country is citing Yahoo today, so if they can drag it out, they will.
  
  And Yahoo has been very reputable as of late. That's what makes this story have legs.
• mallymal614

  Has Yahoo been university killers or what? But hey, if true, you must be held accountable for your actions .
• krambman

  

  like_that;703499 wrote:Are you kidding me? The media these days has no integrity, especially ESPN. They will report anything even if they overhear a conversation from two grandmas.

  
  Because Yahoo! has established itself as a reputable source and is beginning to assert itself in the sports reporting market. Because the two authors of the article have reputations to protect (Charle Robinson broke the Reggie Bush story and Dan Wetzel wrote the book Death to the BCS). These aren't some random bloggers or a start-up website trying to make a name for itself. This is a reputable source and reputable writers, so they aren't going to just come out with this on a hunch. They also said that this article is a result of a two month Yahoo! investigation. If they didn't have integrity they would have broken this story when they first found out for fear of being scooped, not two months later.
• OneBuckeye

  

  se-alum;703504 wrote:Gee will probably be there to announce the Defamation suit against Wetzel & Robinson.

  
  Lets hope
• Automatik

  

  Jawbreaker;703487 wrote:Not if you are trying to trap someone in a lie.

  
  Good point. I just don't see how they will have any solid proof. I'll say it again....I honestly don't think Tressel would do something like this, but anything is possible.
• krambman

  

  An AP reporter in Columbus just caught up with Gordon Gee and he said that the University reported a possible violation to the NCAA as soon as they found out about it and then waited on word from the NCAA how best to handle it before making it a statement.
  
  This makes it sounds like they will confirm the story tonight.