Disgusted with Trump administration - Part I

• CenterBHSFan

  

  O-Trap;1849952 wrote:Unfortunately, we don't get to detach ourselves from the federal government in an economic crisis. Cutting taxes has to come after cutting spending.

  Cheers! (trying out some Crown apple)
• Spock

  

  Lol at sleeper trying to misinterpret federal law.
• Con_Alma

  Many earnings reports were just released impacting the the nice rise over the last couple of days.
• Heretic

  

  CenterBHSFan;1849963 wrote:Cheers! (trying out some Crown apple)

  I haven't been able to get into any Crown other than regular for any length of time. First time I had apple, I liked it and it's been worse every time after that.
• CenterBHSFan

  

  Heretic;1849981 wrote:I haven't been able to get into any Crown other than regular for any length of time. First time I had apple, I liked it and it's been worse every time after that.

  Splash some cranberry juice in it :RpS_w00t:
• jmog

  Crown Apple is some good stuff.
• sleeper

  

  "People don't realize, you know, the Civil War, if you think about it, why?"

  http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/331349-trump-why-was-there-the-civil-war
  
  Daily embarrassment continues. How much longer is the GOP going to pick party over country?
• CenterBHSFan

  

  sleeper;1851004 wrote:http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/331349-trump-why-was-there-the-civil-war
  
  Daily embarrassment continues. How much longer is the GOP going to pick party over country?

  I'm going to guess that the GOP will do so as long as everyone in the Dem party does so. The two big-hitters rely on this. Without this group think, what do they have?
• sleeper

  

  CenterBHSFan;1851011 wrote:I'm going to guess that the GOP will do so as long as everyone in the Dem party does so. The two big-hitters rely on this. Without this group think, what do they have?

  Dems are choosing country over party by opposing this embarrassment as a President.
• superman

  sleeper;1851012 wrote:Dems are choosing country over party by opposing this embarrassment as a President.

  Seldom right and wrong again.
• sleeper

  

  superman;1851014 wrote:Seldom right and wrong again.

  Just need QO and all the rednecks will have come to Trump's defense!
• CenterBHSFan

  

  sleeper;1851012 wrote:Dems are choosing country over party by opposing this embarrassment as a President.

  Except for the many Bernie people who voted for Clinton purely on idea "democrat". I don't think these (Bernie supporters) people voted for her because of her hawkishness. I don't think they voted for her because of her resume. Also, part of these people, if not the majority, are moving towards total progressivism. I actually had somebody tell me that she considered Hillary to be the vehicle that would drive closer to the goal of her ideal of socialism, as compared to anybody else.
  Yes, there were also many people who voted for Clinton simply because she wasn't Trump. But I think they would be the minority of the whole.
• sleeper

  

  http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/01/politics/trump-michelle-obama-girls-education/index.html
  

  The Trump administration is discontinuing a signature girls education initiative championed by former first lady Michelle Obama, according to officials.
  
  The "Let Girls Learn" program, which she and President Barack Obama started in 2015 to facilitate educational opportunities for adolescent girls in developing countries, will cease operation immediately, according to an internal document obtained by CNN.

  GOP wants and supports removing education opportunities for girls around the world. Simply amazing and totally not misogynistic.
• sleeper

  

  CenterBHSFan;1851016 wrote:Except for the many Bernie people who voted for Clinton purely on idea "democrat". I don't think these (Bernie supporters) people voted for her because of her hawkishness. I don't think they voted for her because of her resume. Also, part of these people, if not the majority, are moving towards total progressivism. I actually had somebody tell me that she considered Hillary to be the vehicle that would drive closer to the goal of her ideal of socialism, as compared to anybody else.
  Yes, there were also many people who voted for Clinton simply because she wasn't Trump. But I think they would be the minority of the whole.

  Please tell me more about the 2016 election. It's over.
  
  This is about Trump. He is the President. He doesn't know WHY the civil war happened. Stop being a partisan redneck hack; this is simply embarrassing and unfitting for the office of the President.
• sleeper

  

  http://www.salon.com/2017/04/30/trump-invited-philippines-leader-rodrigo-duterte-to-the-white-house-despite-his-abysmal-human-rights-record/
  

  On Saturday President Trump asked the president of the Philippines, Rodrigo Duterte, to visit the White House, according to the New York Times. Duterte is an authoritarian leader and has an abysmal human rights record, which includes accusations of ordering extrajudicial killings of suspects in the ongoing drug war inside the country.
  
  The White House issued a statement on Saturday night that said Trump had a “very friendly conversation with Mr. Duterte,” and in that conversation they had “discussed the fact that the Philippines is fighting very hard to rid its country of drugs.”
  
  
  Throughout his first six months in office more than 6,000 people were killed in the war on drugs. Duterte took office in June of last year, and there have been reports of unlawful jails that are kept secretly. Duterte also made a promise to kill 100,000 criminals in his first six months in office and said that he would fill the Manila Bay with so many bodies that the “fish will grow fat.”

  GOP wants and supports giving authority and credibility to dictators that have murdered their own people with an invite to the White House.
  
  Look for BHS fan to tell us about Benghazi or some other deflection rather than denounce the President's actions. Complicit.
• CenterBHSFan

  

  sleeper;1851018 wrote:Please tell me more about the 2016 election. It's over.
  
  This is about Trump. He is the President. He doesn't know WHY the civil war happened. Stop being a partisan redneck hack; this is simply embarrassing and unfitting for the office of the President.

  I'm not a partisan hack. I'm not a Trump supporter either.
  
  You post things and people reply. You don't get to direct their answers if they choose to. Resorting to name calling should be beneath you.
• sleeper

  

  CenterBHSFan;1851023 wrote:I'm not a partisan hack. I'm not a Trump supporter either.
  
  You post things and people reply. You don't get to direct their answers if they choose to. Resorting to name calling should be beneath you.

  Right, not a Trump supporter but blindly defend him at every turn.
  
  You should change your name to "ComplicitBHSFan".
• CenterBHSFan

  

  sleeper;1851020 wrote:Look for BHS fan to tell us about Benghazi or some other deflection rather than denounce the President's actions. Complicit.

  I've disparaged Trump multiple times, even called him a jackass on several occasions. If that is being complicit, then I can only suspect that you're hitting the bubbly a little early!
• CenterBHSFan

  

  Please, while you're at this, list specific instances where I've defended Trump. I'll wait.
• sleeper

  

  CenterBHSFan;1851025 wrote:I've disparaged Trump multiple times, even called him a jackass on several occasions. If that is being complicit, then I can only suspect that you're hitting the bubbly a little early!

  Then you should be supporting the party that is actively engaged to remove this embarrassment from office and restrain regressive policy that he proposes.
  
  Instead you would rather talk about Clinton and the Democrats choosing party over country with no evidence of such. But yes, you aren't a partisan hack and you aren't complicit; maybe on Fox News but not in reality.
• sleeper

  

  CenterBHSFan;1851026 wrote:Please, while you're at this, list specific instances where I've defended Trump. I'll wait.

  Every post of yours in this thread is solid evidence. You are complicit in Trump and his actions.
• CenterBHSFan

  

  sleeper;1851027 wrote:Then you should be supporting the party that is actively engaged to remove this embarrassment from office and restrain regressive policy that he proposes.
  
  Instead you would rather talk about Clinton and the Democrats choosing party over country with no evidence of such. But yes, you aren't a partisan hack and you aren't complicit; maybe on Fox News but not in reality.

  I'm not supporting either party. How in the world can you disparage party identifying in one post and then tell somebody to support a party in another?
  
  You're tripping over yourself at this point.
• CenterBHSFan

  

  sleeper;1851028 wrote:Every post of yours in this thread is solid evidence. You are complicit in Trump and his actions.

  Back it up. Go and find your evidence. I'll wait.
• sleeper

  

  CenterBHSFan;1851029 wrote:I'm not supporting either party. How in the world can you disparage party identifying in one post and then tell somebody to support a party in another?
  
  You're tripping over yourself at this point.

  The world doesn't have time or space for fence riders who pretend it's not their fault. You did not vote for Hillary Clinton and therefore are complicit in the ownership of TRUMP.
  
  You own it and are complicit in this embarrassment. I'll wait for your curated Fox News response about how terrible Obama was.
• CenterBHSFan

  

  sleeper;1851031 wrote:The world doesn't have time or space for fence riders who pretend it's not their fault. You did not vote for Hillary Clinton and therefore are complicit in the ownership of TRUMP.
  
  You own it and are complicit in this embarrassment. I'll wait for your curated Fox News response about how terrible Obama was.

  HAH!
  
  Yeah. I voted for Johnson SO THAT MAKES ME COMPLICIT!
  
  I will give you props for your TYT impression. Good job! : thumbup: