iclfan2
Reppin' the 330/216/843
9,465
posts
Joined
Nov 2009
iclfan2
Reppin' the 330/216/843
Sun, Jan 14, 2018 2:59 PM
posted by SportsAndLady
Watching this jaguars game, anyone wanna say a RB with a top pick isn’t a good idea? Jags’ fournette makes this jaguars offense so much better.
So does Bell, and he was the 48th pick. I still don’t want a rb for our specific situation (needs, coach,etc) in the top 4.
SportsAndLady
Senior Member
39,070
posts
Joined
Nov 2009
SportsAndLady
Senior Member
Sun, Jan 14, 2018 3:08 PM
posted by iclfan2
So does Bell, and he was the 48th pick. I still don’t want a rb for our specific situation (needs, coach,etc) in the top 4.
This franchise can’t even work til 5pm, let alone draft a stud RB in the second round.
iclfan2
Reppin' the 330/216/843
9,465
posts
Joined
Nov 2009
iclfan2
Reppin' the 330/216/843
Mon, Jan 15, 2018 11:48 AM
Lol so if Hue hires an OC who hasn't called plays, he would still call plays? Why the hell is this guy allowed to still be here.
Mularky rumors currently (who would call plays).
iclfan2
Reppin' the 330/216/843
9,465
posts
Joined
Nov 2009
iclfan2
Reppin' the 330/216/843
Mon, Jan 15, 2018 12:29 PM
posted by BR1986FB
Outside of Gregg Williams, he's pretty much gutted his coaching staff in a "it was them, not me" type move. Plays the blame game way too much to save his own skin.
Right, like it was the rb coach's fault he decided to never run it...
Commander of Awesome
Senior Pwner
24,621
posts
Joined
May 2010
Commander of Awesome
Senior Pwner
Mon, Jan 15, 2018 12:31 PM
posted by SportsAndLady
Watching this jaguars game, anyone wanna say a RB with a top pick isn’t a good idea? Jags’ fournette makes this jaguars offense so much better.
Yes for fucks sakes I sure as fuck do.
kizer permanente
Senior Member
1,309
posts
Joined
Aug 2017
kizer permanente
Senior Member
Mon, Jan 15, 2018 12:56 PM
posted by BR1986FB
If the Browns were going to replicate a particular NFL team's model, it should be the Jaguars. They have built that team up with a lot of high draft picks and have sprinkled in some key free agent signings/trades. They are winning with defense, a strong running game and (essentially) a game manager-type QB.
This year has been an outlier but it shows a team can get to, and compete, in the playoffs without a franchise type QB.
Of the final 4 teams, only 1 is a franchise Qb. Foles, Bortles, and Keenum aren’t good. They all have great defenses though. Cleveland has a chance to get there with their corp, so that gives me some promise.
vball10set
paying it forward
26,788
posts
Joined
Nov 2009
vball10set
paying it forward
Mon, Jan 15, 2018 2:50 PM
posted by SportsAndLady
Watching this jaguars game, anyone wanna say a RB with a top pick isn’t a good idea? Jags’ fournette makes this jaguars offense so much better.
I've been championing this for a couple of weeks now and have been slammed-lol...yes, I think it's an excellent idea...reps.
SportsAndLady
Senior Member
39,070
posts
Joined
Nov 2009
SportsAndLady
Senior Member
Mon, Jan 15, 2018 4:33 PM
posted by vball10set
I've been championing this for a couple of weeks now and have been slammed-lol...yes, I think it's an excellent idea...reps.
I’m not with you on the Barkley at 1 train. I’m taking the best QB available at 1. If Barkley (or whoever) is available at 4 or if we trade down and get a stud RB later, I’m perfectly okay with that.
queencitybuckeye
Senior Member
8,068
posts
Joined
Nov 2009
queencitybuckeye
Senior Member
Mon, Jan 15, 2018 4:57 PM
Quarterback is the only position to draft on need, where you take one even if you have players at different positions that grade higher. Other than that, need is a terrible talent evaluator. If Barkley is there at 4 and he's your highest rated (non-QB) player on the board, he's the pick.
Verbal Kint
Senior Member
1,062
posts
Joined
Jul 2017
Verbal Kint
Senior Member
Mon, Jan 15, 2018 6:32 PM
Would much rather Fitzpatrick at #4
SportsAndLady
Senior Member
39,070
posts
Joined
Nov 2009
SportsAndLady
Senior Member
Mon, Jan 15, 2018 7:32 PM
posted by Verbal Kint
Would much rather Fitzpatrick at #4
He's shooting up draft boards. If he's there at 4, it'd be a great pick.
like_that
1st Team All-PWN
29,228
posts
Joined
Apr 2010
like_that
1st Team All-PWN
Mon, Jan 15, 2018 8:15 PM
posted by SportsAndLady
Watching this jaguars game, anyone wanna say a RB with a top pick isn’t a good idea? Jags’ fournette makes this jaguars offense so much better.
Yes, the Jags would be in the same spot if they drafted the two better rookies (hunt and kamara) over fournette in the later rounds.
I am not saying the running game isn't important. Generally teams that find a way to run the ball and stop the run also find themselves very competitive. It's a value argument for me. You can find the same or better value in the 2nd or 3rd round. This upcoming draft class for instance is pretty loaded at the RB position. There is no reason to be drating Barkley in the first round with this class. Based on the last 15 years, there is a great chance Barkley won't even be the best RB in this draft class.
SportsAndLady
Senior Member
39,070
posts
Joined
Nov 2009
SportsAndLady
Senior Member
Mon, Jan 15, 2018 8:51 PM
posted by like_that
Yes, the Jags would be in the same spot if they drafted the two better rookies (hunt and kamara) over fournette in the later rounds.
I am not saying the running game isn't important. Generally teams that find a way to run the ball and stop the run also find themselves very competitive. It's a value argument for me. You can find the same or better value in the 2nd or 3rd round. This upcoming draft class for instance is pretty loaded at the RB position. There is no reason to be drating Barkley in the first round with this class. Based on the last 15 years, there is a great chance Barkley won't even be the best RB in this draft class.
In the last 3 drafts, there was a 100% success rate in drafting RB's in the first 10 picks of the draft.
Fournette, McCaffrey
Zeke
Todd Gurley
All 4 of those guys can help our team, so why are you so against drafting someone in the top 10 that can help our team?
I realize there are studs in the 3rd, 4th rounds. There are also quite a bit of duds. Not a lot of duds are drafted in the top 10 at the RB position.
Commander of Awesome
Senior Pwner
24,621
posts
Joined
May 2010
Commander of Awesome
Senior Pwner
Mon, Jan 15, 2018 11:00 PM
posted by like_that
Yes, the Jags would be in the same spot if they drafted the two better rookies (hunt and kamara) over fournette in the later rounds.
I am not saying the running game isn't important. Generally teams that find a way to run the ball and stop the run also find themselves very competitive. It's a value argument for me. You can find the same or better value in the 2nd or 3rd round. This upcoming draft class for instance is pretty loaded at the RB position. There is no reason to be drating Barkley in the first round with this class. Based on the last 15 years, there is a great chance Barkley won't even be the best RB in this draft class.
Every team in the playoffs as of this weekend (except one) was in the top 6 of running the ball this season. The other is the Patriots who were 10th. It is very important.
Commander of Awesome
Senior Pwner
24,621
posts
Joined
May 2010
Commander of Awesome
Senior Pwner
Mon, Jan 15, 2018 11:00 PM
Verbal Kint
Senior Member
1,062
posts
Joined
Jul 2017
Verbal Kint
Senior Member
Mon, Jan 15, 2018 11:21 PM
So, just to be clear, he is not going to do the dishes?
kizer permanente
Senior Member
1,309
posts
Joined
Aug 2017
kizer permanente
Senior Member
Tue, Jan 16, 2018 6:14 AM
vball10set
paying it forward
26,788
posts
Joined
Nov 2009
vball10set
paying it forward
Tue, Jan 16, 2018 7:56 AM
posted by kizer permanente
motherfucker don't have heat in his trailer? He's dressed like its 30 degrees in there.
lol--talk about fitting the stereotype too, eh?
vball10set
paying it forward
26,788
posts
Joined
Nov 2009
vball10set
paying it forward
Tue, Jan 16, 2018 8:00 AM
posted by SportsAndLady
I’m not with you on the Barkley at 1 train. I’m taking the best QB available at 1. If Barkley (or whoever) is available at 4 or if we trade down and get a stud RB later, I’m perfectly okay with that.
The only problem with that is there is no "best available QB"...you have three QB's that are interchangeable, so one of them will be there at 4. Take Barkley, cause we've seen what a stud running back can do.