LOL....so the idiot formerly known as AOC has said today that Obamacare didn't do shit for her as a bartender, and we can't afford free college when Trump pays $750 in taxes per year.  Actually, maybe two of the more rational and honest statements she said (although the latter is a strawman).

Only a matter of time before she and her posse start pretending inflation never existed and we can just print money, like we did for Covid, for anything and everything we want to do.

SJW checkmate by Police officer "How do you know they don't identify as female? pic.twitter.com/p20Szx1Gra

— Luke Rudkowski (@Lukewearechange) October 30, 2020

posted by CenterBHSFan

SJW checkmate by Police officer "How do you know they don't identify as female? pic.twitter.com/p20Szx1Gra

— Luke Rudkowski (@Lukewearechange) October 30, 2020

LMFAO that's great....foul-mouthed fat bitch started crying like a baby after the cops took her down and arrested her.   Protest fail.

This woman is a columnist for the Boston Globe and an NPR affiliate.

See the difference? Me neither. pic.twitter.com/vRkGJOoyZ9

— Renée Graham 🏳️‍🌈 (@reneeygraham) October 31, 2020

posted by justincredible

This woman is a columnist for the Boston Globe and an NPR affiliate.

See the difference? Me neither. pic.twitter.com/vRkGJOoyZ9

— Renée Graham 🏳️‍🌈 (@reneeygraham) October 31, 2020

The difference between the two pictures is that she probably has empathy and understanding for the misunderstood religious warriors on the right, and hates the people on the left. 

posted by Dr Winston O'Boogie

The difference between the two pictures is that she probably has empathy and understanding for the misunderstood religious warriors on the right, and hates the people on the left. 

"austere religious scholar"

posted by justincredible

What could possibly go wrong...

https://komonews.com/news/local/seattle-city-council-mulls-plan-that-could-result-in-dismissal-of-many-misdemeanor-crimes

While I don't think that "if you're poor, crime shouldn't count!" is a valid rationalization for this, I am in favor of most misdemeanors not sticking, since most of those "crimes" are minor league shit that have no purpose in society other than propagating police overreach. 

In other words, a decent idea with shit execution. Which, all things considered, is about the best we can hope for from our dipshit gubment institutions.

I'm done.

Too Many Black Men Wish to Be White, and That's a Problem the Election Won't Endhttps://t.co/8uBIgPwrAM pic.twitter.com/tAfDD5yBAh

— The Root (@TheRoot) October 30, 2020

posted by Heretic

While I don't think that "if you're poor, crime shouldn't count!" is a valid rationalization for this, I am in favor of most misdemeanors not sticking, since most of those "crimes" are minor league shit that have no purpose in society other than propagating police overreach. 

In other words, a decent idea with shit execution. Which, all things considered, is about the best we can hope for from our dipshit gubment institutions.

No victim, no crime.

posted by justincredible

No victim, no crime.

No woman, no cry

posted by justincredible

This woman is a columnist for the Boston Globe and an NPR affiliate.

See the difference? Me neither. pic.twitter.com/vRkGJOoyZ9

— Renée Graham 🏳️‍🌈 (@reneeygraham) October 31, 2020

She is mentally ill. 

posted by QuakerOats

She is mentally ill. 

On a base level, she is spot on.  Both claim to serve the great invisible man in the sky. At least the people on the right aren’t the hypocrites here. If they take an oath before god, they are willing to kill and die for a  it. The guys on the left only will do it as a manor of convenience . They will however sacrifice their wives if they get a little old, fat, or something younger and hotter comes along. At least the guys on the right would just add the younguns to their clan

posted by Devils Advocate

On a base level, she is spot on.  Both claim to serve the great invisible man in the sky. At least the people on the right aren’t the hypocrites here. If they take an oath before god, they are willing to kill and die for a  it. The guys on the left only will do it as a manor of convenience . They will however sacrifice their wives if they get a little old, fat, or something younger and hotter comes along. At least the guys on the right would just add the younguns to their clan

Congratulations on writing the dumbest thing I have read today.

posted by Devils Advocate

On a base level, she is spot on.  Both claim to serve the great invisible man in the sky. At least the people on the right aren’t the hypocrites here. If they take an oath before god, they are willing to kill and die for a  it. The guys on the left only will do it as a manor of convenience . They will however sacrifice their wives if they get a little old, fat, or something younger and hotter comes along. At least the guys on the right would just add the younguns to their clan

posted by jmog

Congratulations on writing the dumbest thing I have read today.

Your bias is showing.....

posted by like_that

I will stand by my stance.

Still more credible than the bullshit QOnon posts.

posted by Devils Advocate

On a base level, she is spot on.  Both claim to serve the great invisible man in the sky. At least the people on the right aren’t the hypocrites here. If they take an oath before god, they are willing to kill and die for a  it. The guys on the left only will do it as a manor of convenience . They will however sacrifice their wives if they get a little old, fat, or something younger and hotter comes along. At least the guys on the right would just add the younguns to their clan

posted by Devils Advocate

On a base level, she is spot on.  Both claim to serve the great invisible man in the sky. At least the people on the right aren’t the hypocrites here. If they take an oath before god, they are willing to kill and die for a  it. The guys on the left only will do it as a manor of convenience . They will however sacrifice their wives if they get a little old, fat, or something younger and hotter comes along. At least the guys on the right would just add the younguns to their clan

Woke Rationale 101:

1. ALWAYS find a way to justify Islamic murders.

2. Fight against stereotypes  by using stereotypes.

3. Assume anyone not in step with you fits some type of white trash/old white guy stereotype with no exceptions.'

4. MOST IMPORTANTLY, make absolutely certain that you communicate in no uncertain terms that you are an atheist/agnostic regardless of whether it is relevant to the point being made. 

I wasn't sure where to put this, but it's so ridiculous that I'm dropping it into this thread:

Happening now: We are live tweeting as 🇺🇸 the U.S. record on human rights is now being reviewed at the U.N.'s Human Rights Council by Cuba, Belarus, North Korea, Syria, Iran, China & other champions of human rights. https://t.co/B95bSuJhZM

— UN Watch (@UNWatch) November 9, 2020

posted by Devils Advocate

Your bias is showing.....

Ironic for a first post after that gobbledegook you posted above this.

posted by CenterBHSFan

I wasn't sure where to put this, but it's so ridiculous that I'm dropping it into this thread:

Happening now: We are live tweeting as 🇺🇸 the U.S. record on human rights is now being reviewed at the U.N.'s Human Rights Council by Cuba, Belarus, North Korea, Syria, Iran, China & other champions of human rights. https://t.co/B95bSuJhZM

— UN Watch (@UNWatch) November 9, 2020

This isn't satire?

posted by like_that

This isn't satire?

Even if it's not the UN is still a useless joke, so there's that.

San Francisco bars natural gas in new construction

San Francisco has followed up on prohibition of natural gas in new city-owned buildings by extending the ban to all new structures. The measure affects more than 54,000 homes and commercial space spanning 32 million square feet, all of which must be fully electric.

Full Story: San Francisco Chronicle (tiered subscription model) (11/11) 

posted by QuakerOats

San Francisco bars natural gas in new construction

San Francisco has followed up on prohibition of natural gas in new city-owned buildings by extending the ban to all new structures. The measure affects more than 54,000 homes and commercial space spanning 32 million square feet, all of which must be fully electric.

Full Story: San Francisco Chronicle (tiered subscription model) (11/11) 

The psychosis is real

What is the obsession with SF?  It's nothing new that it's a liberal bastion.  It has been for a long, long time.  It's always going to have stuff like this going on.  It's not part of a new trend.  It's been this way since before I was born (1970).  SF ways are not going to spread to where you are - assuming you live somewhere red.  They like it the way it is there.  So what?  If you don't, I would encourage you not to move there.  If the people who live there want it to be that way, more power to them.  But renewed outrage over every story about some progressive measure coming out of SF is mindless.  Why don't you post your outrage at Barrow, Alaska's extreme cold weather - it'd follow the same logic.  

Oof