Progressives, part 3...

Home Forums Politics

Spock

Senior Member

Mon, Oct 22, 2018 11:41 AM
posted by CenterBHSFan

I just finished watching Colion Noir's vid about the drug epidemic that is going on in Seattle and all of the consequences because of it. It's wild how much the average citizen has to deal with on a daily basis; from going to work, the store or the park, everybody has to deal with it in some manner.

Regardless of how you think about drug issues, it seems pretty obvious that the progressive ideas on how to deal with (or not deal with) their own rules isn't working out. 
And it's not just Seattle. San Francisco for example has an app to keep track of human feces on downtown streets. 

Anyway, here's the vid: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9fWGKrxV3Pc

Issue 1 in Ohio will end up making our cities this way

O-Trap

Chief Shenanigans Officer

Mon, Oct 22, 2018 12:02 PM
posted by CenterBHSFan

And it's not just Seattle. San Francisco for example has an app to keep track of human feces on downtown streets. 

SF is such a shithole.  The whole damn downtown smells like piss.
 

posted by Spock

Issue 1 in Ohio will end up making our cities this way

 

 

QuakerOats

Senior Member

Mon, Oct 22, 2018 1:42 PM
posted by Spock

Issue 1 in Ohio will end up making our cities this way

 

Issue 1 is a total fucking disaster.

 

QuakerOats

Senior Member

Spock

Senior Member

Mon, Oct 22, 2018 6:24 PM
posted by O-Trap

SF is such a shithole.  The whole damn downtown smells like piss.
 

posted by Spock

Issue 1 in Ohio will end up making our cities this way

 

 

 

Cool meme bro.  You have a counter argument on basically decriminilizing heroin use?  Public drug use will become common in Ohio with issue 1.

superman

Senior Member

Mon, Oct 22, 2018 7:10 PM
posted by Spock

Cool meme bro.  You have a counter argument on basically decriminilizing heroin use?  Public drug use will become common in Ohio with issue 1.

I honestly don't give a shit if someone uses heroin. The troubling part of issue 1 is that doesn't allow for exceptions for dealers. 

Pablo and his cartel buddies get caught with a ton of meth?  Misdemeanor

queencitybuckeye

Senior Member

Mon, Oct 22, 2018 7:17 PM

The government has no business whatsoever in the decisions I make in terms of what I put in my body.

With the current epidemic, do people really believe that there's some huge pent-up demand just waiting for it to become legal?

 

justincredible

Honorable Admin

Mon, Oct 22, 2018 7:37 PM
posted by superman

I honestly don't give a shit if someone uses heroin. The troubling part of issue 1 is that doesn't allow for exceptions for dealers. 

Pablo and his cartel buddies get caught with a ton of meth?  Misdemeanor

Pretty sure this isn't true. From the amendment:

(G) Provisions Do Not Apply to Convictions for the Sale, Distribution, or Trafficking of Drugs. Divisions (D) and (F) of this Section do not apply to convictions for the sale, distribution, or trafficking of drugs or to convictions for any drug offense that, based on volume or weight, and as of January 1, 2018, was classified as a first, second, or third-degree felony offense.

Spock

Senior Member

Mon, Oct 22, 2018 7:49 PM
posted by queencitybuckeye

The government has no business whatsoever in the decisions I make in terms of what I put in my body.

With the current epidemic, do people really believe that there's some huge pent-up demand just waiting for it to become legal?

 

You dont care now but i am sure you will when it moves in next door to you

justincredible

Honorable Admin

Mon, Oct 22, 2018 7:59 PM
posted by Spock

You dont care now but i am sure you will when it moves in next door to you

Living in Cincinnati, it is next door to me. 

queencitybuckeye

Senior Member

Mon, Oct 22, 2018 8:06 PM
posted by Spock

You dont care now but i am sure you will when it moves in next door to you

Yes, the war on drugs has been keeping me safe all this time. That's why my neighbors aren't junkies.

 

CenterBHSFan

333 - I'm only half evil

Mon, Oct 22, 2018 8:48 PM

Just going to nonchalantly say that I'm glad I don't live in any town. Living in rural areas has its advantages! I can't see what my neighbors are doing and they can't see me unless they ride or drive to my house. No traffic is also a plus!

Dr Winston O'Boogie

Senior Member

Mon, Oct 22, 2018 9:55 PM
posted by Spock

You dont care now but i am sure you will when it moves in next door to you

Right. Because the drug war has been a great success. Criminalizing drug use has had an unbelievably positive impact on our society. 

superman

Senior Member

Mon, Oct 22, 2018 10:32 PM
posted by justincredible

Pretty sure this isn't true. From the amendment:

(G) Provisions Do Not Apply to Convictions for the Sale, Distribution, or Trafficking of Drugs. Divisions (D) and (F) of this Section do not apply to convictions for the sale, distribution, or trafficking of drugs or to convictions for any drug offense that, based on volume or weight, and as of January 1, 2018, was classified as a first, second, or third-degree felony offense.

I was given bad information. Thank you.

O-Trap

Chief Shenanigans Officer

Mon, Oct 22, 2018 10:46 PM
posted by Spock

Cool meme bro.  You have a counter argument on basically decriminilizing heroin use?  Public drug use will become common in Ohio with issue 1.

A counter-argument?  Sure.

1. Do you honestly think this mass of potential heroin users who are currently avoiding it just because it's against the law, as if they just really want to do heroin, even though it's public knowledge that it can kill you, but that pesky law is just getting in the way?  If so, I'd love to hear what makes you think there's a mass of people just waiting with baited breath for heroin to become legal, so they can use.

2. Do you actually think people in prison can't get heroin, such that the punitive measures for getting hooked on something (which is a stupid principle already) somehow stops anyone from using?

3. I was under the impression that you were opposed to a nanny state, because you know what's better for you than big gubmint.  Was I mistaken?  Are you secretly a big government guy who believes we need government to tell us what's best for us to keep us from utterly destroying ourselves?

4. If drugs are made legal, guess what happens to the contents of what people are buying.  It gets examined, studied, monitored, etc.  No more basement mixes with miscellaneous (and potentially dangerous) other ingredients.

5. It'd be good for increasing competition, which might further the desire to study ways to give the high while minimizing or eliminating the risk and making it cheaper.  Do you know who likes it remaining illegal?  The guys who own drug empires.  It keeps the competition down, and it keeps their product out of the realm of FDA regulation or monitoring.  Keeping drugs illegal is exactly what the drug pushers want.  They don't want the competition or oversight.  They want the only people in their world to be other people willing to break the law and live as criminals.

Do you have one shred of reasoning for why putting users in prison with other users, where they can still find product occasionally, benefits anyone?

O-Trap

Chief Shenanigans Officer

Mon, Oct 22, 2018 10:47 PM
posted by Spock

You dont care now but i am sure you will when it moves in next door to you

It has been next door to me.  Literally.  Squatters lived next door and used in the house with friends and randos.  I know this will probably blow your mind, but it didn't really affect my household at all.

QuakerOats

Senior Member

Tue, Oct 23, 2018 10:21 AM
posted by Dr Winston O'Boogie

Right. Because the drug war has been a great success. Criminalizing drug use has had an unbelievably positive impact on our society. 

 

 

Ergo, drug use has had an unbelievably positive impact on our society.

 

 

 

Christ Almighty.

QuakerOats

Senior Member

Tue, Oct 23, 2018 10:28 AM
posted by superman

I was given bad information. Thank you.

 

You will be able to possess enough fentanyl to kill 10,000 people, but families are not to care; all is well, slap on the wrist.  The same lunatic left goes crazy if you possess a firearm that could kill 10 people. 

 

The insanity is immeasurable.

justincredible

Honorable Admin

Tue, Oct 23, 2018 10:31 AM
posted by QuakerOats

 

You will be able to possess enough fentanyl to kill 10,000 people, but families are not to care; all is well, slap on the wrist.  The same lunatic left goes crazy if you possess a firearm that could kill 10 people. 

No, you won't.

 

Heretic

Son of the Sun

Tue, Oct 23, 2018 11:32 AM

All you gotta do is mention drugs and watch the hilarity of the "big gubment is bad!!!!" people jump all over themselves to profess how we need big gubment in full force to protect them from drugs.

Spock

Senior Member

Tue, Oct 23, 2018 11:41 AM
posted by Heretic

All you gotta do is mention drugs and watch the hilarity of the "big gubment is bad!!!!" people jump all over themselves to profess how we need big gubment in full force to protect them from drugs.

You are an idiot

Heretic

Son of the Sun

Tue, Oct 23, 2018 11:49 AM
posted by Spock

You are an idiot

Says the guy who's incapable of formulating a remotely logical argument.

The war on drugs is amazingly expensive and really doesn't work, but BY GOD WE GOTTA KEEP THROWING MONEY AT IT!!!!!!

O-Trap

Chief Shenanigans Officer

Tue, Oct 23, 2018 1:54 PM
posted by CenterBHSFan

This study says that a significant amount of millenials suffer from PTSD because of the 2016 election:

https://tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/07448481.2018.1515763?journalCode=vach20&

I'm seeing this all over Twitter, so who knows how subjective it is.

I've never been one to dismiss people's emotions out-of-hand, but how fragile do you have to be for an election ... prior to any result of that election ... to drive you to PTSD?  Fucking hell.
 

posted by QuakerOats

Ergo, drug use has had an unbelievably positive impact on our society.

 

So, because drugs are bad, we've waged an unsuccessful, tax-dollar-sucking war against them that has, to this point, been an utter failure, and your defense of keeping it in place is that drugs are still bad?

Drug use has had a negative effect, yes?  So, just to be clear, is your reaction to have big daddy Government tell us what to do, since they are apparently the ones who know what's best, and we can't be trusted to make that decision for ourselves?

Homelessness and poverty have had a bad impact on our society, as well.  Would you argue that Big Daddy Guv get involved there, too?
 

posted by Heretic

All you gotta do is mention drugs and watch the hilarity of the "big gubment is bad!!!!" people jump all over themselves to profess how we need big gubment in full force to protect them from drugs.

 

It's essentially how you know the fake "small government" people from the real ones.  The real ones want personal liberty, even if it means that a person is allowed to utterly destroy their own lives or do things that the majority of people find distasteful.
 

posted by Spock

You are an idiot

Seriously?  How's that glass house suiting you?  Comfy?  You sure seem to spend a lot of time in it.