Archive

2015 Browns Offseason Thread

  • BR1986FB
    Commander of Awesome;1711558 wrote:Sure aren't, just saying that while Kap may not be Luck, I'd sure as hell give a lot for his services.
    Absolutely. We're talking hypotheticals here. The odds of SF parting with their starting QB are extremely thin but if given the opportunity, you pull the trigger.
  • Commander of Awesome
    Dawgs By Nature ‏@DawgsByNature 8m8 minutes ago Per @caplannfl, the Trent Cole to Indy thing is not a done deal. #Browns could still be in play. @andy_baskin - http://www.dawgsbynature.com/2015/3/10/8182039/cleveland-browns-free-agency-live-blog-rumors-signings-and-more …
  • SportsAndLady
    But iggy reporter it on his thread!!
  • BR1986FB
    It does look like Indy is making a heavy push by nabbing Gore & Andre Johnson. Johnson should do well with a legit QB like Luck to throw it to him. Screw those assholes.
  • thavoice
    BR1986FB;1711568 wrote:It does look like Indy is making a heavy push by nabbing Gore & Andre Johnson. Johnson should do well with a legit QB like Luck to throw it to him. Screw those assholes.
    That Gore signing could be interesting, and a reason why things shouldnt always be leaked. It came out he was probably signing with the eagles, but got cold feet according to shefter as Gore was telling people it just didnt feel right!
  • thavoice
    If 2014 was just a blip then that Hartline signing is a good one. I think if the browns even consider Gordon at all in their future plans then they are just plain foolish. I would proceed with the roster as if he isnt going to be on the team ever again. If he does get reinstated and can play then that is a bonus.
  • Dr. KnOiTaLL
    thavoice;1711583 wrote:If 2014 was just a blip then that Hartline signing is a good one. I think if the browns even consider Gordon at all in their future plans then they are just plain foolish. I would proceed with the roster as if he isnt going to be on the team ever again. If he does get reinstated and can play then that is a bonus.
    No one respects you here, so your opinion doesn't really matter.
  • bases_loaded
    Shocker...Ruiter reporting Brown's not in on Revis....Patriots or Jets...I tweeted at mr. face for radio earlier when he said he is hearing a big rumor about Revis, that this has "new logo" written all over it.
  • sleeper
    I'll pass on Revis. He's washed up and will cost too much money.
  • DeyDurkie5
    Commander of Awesome;1711482 wrote:Well then Farmer should be given the walking papers now. Gilbert had an up and down season, TONS of potential, and working hard this off season. Desir looked pretty damn good in the limited looks he got, more PT towards the end of the year. Hell Skrine turned from Ralph Toast Brown to a solid #2 CB over his 4 yrs, not sure why Desir/Gilbert can't do that as well.
    You fucking moron. Having Revis and Haden would be a no brainer.
  • DeyDurkie5
    We shouldn't go after kap, we need to stop the run /commanderofstarbucks
  • se-alum
    sleeper;1711603 wrote:I'll pass on Revis. He's washed up and will cost too much money.
    He's not washed up, but he could cost too much money.
  • Commander of Awesome
    DeyDurkie5;1711604 wrote:You fucking moron. Having Revis and Haden would be a no brainer.
    There's actually a ton of reasons why it's not a no brainer dumbass.
  • bases_loaded
    I saw where the Browns are interested in Charles Clay. Perfect, a TE that can block and catch passes, sign me up. Although with Graham going to the Seahawks, thats another destination closed for Cameron, wonder if he ends up here anyways?
  • se-alum
    bases_loaded;1711628 wrote:I saw where the Browns are interested in Charles Clay. Perfect, a TE that can block and catch passes, sign me up. Although with Graham going to the Seahawks, thats another destination closed for Cameron, wonder if he ends up here anyways?
    I'd take Clay over Cameron any day.
  • DeyDurkie5
    Commander of Awesome;1711624 wrote:There's actually a ton of reasons why it's not a no brainer dumbass.
    "We need to stop the run first" is not one of those reasons. Getting Revis would be huge. Period.
  • se-alum
    DeyDurkie5;1711638 wrote:"We need to stop the run first" is not one of those reasons. Getting Revis would be huge. Period.
    The only reason to not go after Revis would be if he had an astronomical salary request.
  • thavoice
    DeyDurkie5;1711638 wrote:"We need to stop the run first" is not one of those reasons. Getting Revis would be huge. Period.
    Getting Revis could serve to stop the run as well as you can put him out there and focus the front 7 easily onthe run!
  • Pick6
    Commander of Awesome;1707237 wrote:Not going to happen. Might as well say you'd be ok with getting Luck as well. Has about the same % chance of happening. Why in the fuck would the rams get rid of bradford? Makes no sense. Use your head.
  • bases_loaded
    Whoa I accidentally clicked on the "other Browns thread"....depressing.
  • SportsAndLady
    se-alum;1711641 wrote:The only reason to not go after Revis would be if he had an astronomical salary request.
    And if he wants a 5 year contract.
  • Commander of Awesome
    LA - theOBR @LaneAdkins Follow Far from convinced he ever plays in Philly RT @Gozjr: @LaneAdkinstell me we won't trade a 1 for bradford

  • Commander of Awesome
    Pick6;1711647 wrote:
    Talking about a trade with the browns numbnuts. Nice try, lol at you saving this hoping for a mini victory. Pathetic.
  • DeyDurkie5
    se-alum;1711641 wrote:The only reason to not go after Revis would be if he had an astronomical salary request.
    Agreed.
  • DeyDurkie5
    SportsAndLady;1711655 wrote:And if he wants a 5 year contract.
    Agreed