2014-2015 Cleveland Cavaliers Season Thread
-
lhslep134
Hope what helps, you confirming that I'm not going to say anything unless someone cares? You really went out of your way there, helping people understand the plain english of what I typed.Commander of Awesome;1731445 wrote:Nobody does or cares. Cavs are in the fucking finals! Hope this helps. -
Commander of Awesome
You asked a question if anyone wants an explanation. I answered no one did. Sorry you don't get all tl;dr on a boring ass topic with the Cavs in the finals. Hope this helps.lhslep134;1731447 wrote:Hope what helps, you confirming that I'm not going to say anything unless someone cares? You really went out of your way there, helping people understand the plain english of what I typed. -
lhslep134
You might want to register for the same reading comprehension class as Webby. I never asked if anyone wanted an explanation. Instead, I stated I would not give it unless anyone wanted it. That's not a question, but nice try!Commander of Awesome;1731449 wrote:You asked a question if anyone wants an explanation. .
Now you've started the whole thread-shitting that Durkie rails on me for. I made a statement responding to what Azu wrote, and you responded in a douchey way. You're fully responsible for what everyone else has to deal with now. -
Commander of Awesome
Wow thats a reach fail if I've ever seen one. Just stop, you're embarrassing yourself lil guy.lhslep134;1731450 wrote:You might want to register for the same reading comprehension class as Webby. I never asked if anyone wanted an explanation. Instead, I stated I would not give it unless anyone wanted it. That's not a question, but nice try!
Now you've started the whole thread-shitting that Durkie rails on me for. I made a statement responding to what Azu wrote, and you responded in a douchey way. You're fully responsible for what everyone else has to deal with now. -
like_that
This is on par with BR blaming S&L for his return to this forum, because S&L made a few unfavorable comments about him while he was "gone." Let's move back to Cavs talk.lhslep134;1731450 wrote:You might want to register for the same reading comprehension class as Webby. I never asked if anyone wanted an explanation. Instead, I stated I would not give it unless anyone wanted it. That's not a question, but nice try!
Now you've started the whole thread-shitting that Durkie rails on me for. I made a statement responding to what Azu wrote, and you responded in a douchey way. You're fully responsible for what everyone else has to deal with now. -
lhslep134
Yeah, it's a reach-fail on my part because you didn't comprehend the difference between a question, where I'm asking for feedback, and a statement, where I'm not.Commander of Awesome;1731451 wrote:Wow thats a reach fail if I've ever seen one. Just stop, you're embarrassing yourself lil guy.
Whatever floats your boat.
But srsly you should take that reading comprehension class with Webbie. -
lhslep134
No, it's not. If COA doesn't make a dumb, douchey comment these past 5 posts between me and COA don't exist; and I called COA out for it immediately. Not the same situation.like_that;1731452 wrote:This is on par with BR blaming S&L for his return to this forum, because S&L made a few unfavorable comments about him while he was "gone." Let's move back to Cavs talk.
If you have a problem with this digression, take it up with COA. No dumb comment from COA, no digression from me (and yes I understand I could let it go but let's acknowledge the bigger issue: COA's unnecessary and antagonistic posts on virtually every thread). -
BR1986FB
Exactly. For as much as Detroit gets a bad rap, it's going through kind of a financial "renaissance." One of the clients I spoke with said Gilbert is gobbling up property in a 45 block area and is committed to revitalizing the area. I wouldn't bet against him.Sonofanump;1731418 wrote:Gilbert is buying up Detroit for pennies and turning it into desired property. -
BR1986FB
I bet part of that meeting was a "wink nod" agreement that LBJ gets a piece of the pie (Cavs) when he's done.sleeper;1731423 wrote:I would bet good money in the meeting between DG and Lebron that DG told Lebron if he came back he would do whatever it takes to build a championship level team, which includes writing a blank check to make it happen. I think one of the things that pissed off Lebron was the Heat's ownership trying to pinch pennies by making questionable roster moves; whereas DG has zero history of that. Lebron may not have the title of GM but he's probably get half his hand in all personnel decisions and that was part of the deal in coming back to Cleveland. -
BR1986FB
Say what you want. If you've would've let the "dead" rest instead of talking shit about them, you wouldn't have this problem little guy.like_that;1731452 wrote:This is on par with BR blaming S&L for his return to this forum, because S&L made a few unfavorable comments about him while he was "gone." Let's move back to Cavs talk. -
ZWICK 4 PREZ
He's not spending that kinda money yet on tax so he doesn't have to worry about a return right now. I'm obviously talking about in the future, you know, when he's paying it.like_that;1731387 wrote:What makes you think he isn't getting a return on them? His team is in the finals in year 1 after they pretty much just completely changed the roster. -
SportsAndLadyCavs are in the finals you idiots. Stop arguing with each other.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk -
like_that
What problem? Just like any poster, nobody gives a fuck if you leave or stay. It's an internet forum. If that's the excuse you need to justify your return, then so be it.BR1986FB;1731469 wrote:Say what you want. If you've would've let the "dead" rest instead of talking shit about them, you wouldn't have this problem little guy.
True, I can't help but think he would be getting a return though for all the reasons stated above. He is committed to bringing titles to Cleveland, and after 4 years of misery (not to mention keeping the team's salary pretty low) I don't think 20 million is going to get in his way, especially with the cap rising after next season. I could be wrong, but it is hard to imagine he turns into Micky Arson on us.ZWICK 4 PREZ;1731471 wrote:He's not spending that kinda money yet on tax so he doesn't have to worry about a return right now. I'm obviously talking about in the future, you know, when he's paying it. -
friendfromlowryI'm fine with the arguing. What's to discuss with the finals? Sleeper and FW already provided astounding arguments ("Who's gonna guard Lebron - Green? LOL what's he ever accomplished?") why the Cavs will win in 5, 6 tops
-
lhslep134
I suppose actual basketball discussion like what types of adjustments we might see, rotations, etc. lolfriendfromlowry;1731477 wrote:I'm fine with the arguing. What's to discuss with the finals? -
Laley23Approximately 78 days till the Finals start...no harm in arguing for the first few while we wait lol.
-
Lovejoy1984
I'd like to see us match up like this to start the game.lhslep134;1731483 wrote:I suppose actual basketball discussion like what types of adjustments we might see, rotations, etc. lol
Curry-Shump
Thompson-LBJ
Barnes-Kyrie
Green-TT
Bogut-Moz
I know Barnes would have the size advantage on Kyrie, but Kyrie won't have to chase him around like he would Thompson. Barnes only avg. 10pts a game this season, so it's doubtful he's gonna light us up, even with the smaller Kyrie on him. I just know for sure, Kyrie cannot be placed on Curry, even if he's 100%, Curry will torch him. -
friendfromlowry
It was sarcasm.lhslep134;1731483 wrote:I suppose actual basketball discussion like what types of adjustments we might see, rotations, etc. lol
But if Bogut find himself in foul trouble we could really take advantage of the rebounding. -
Dr. KnOiTaLL
My worry with Kyrie on Barnes is the second chance opportunities for GS resulting from Barnes crashing the offensive boards. Who did Kyrie guard when we beat GS at home? I was at the game, but can't recall.HighRoller74;1731489 wrote:I'd like to see us match up like this to start the game.
Curry-Shump
Thompson-LBJ
Barnes-Kyrie
Green-TT
Bogut-Moz
I know Barnes would have the size advantage on Kyrie, but Kyrie won't have to chase him around like he would Thompson. Barnes only avg. 10pts a game this season, so it's doubtful he's gonna light us up, even with the smaller Kyrie on him. I just know for sure, Kyrie cannot be placed on Curry, even if he's 100%, Curry will torch him. -
Lovejoy1984
I agree. But for whatever reason when the other team goes small, we tend to match them, instead of exploiting our advantage.friendfromlowry;1731491 wrote:It was sarcasm.
But if Bogut find himself in foul trouble we could really take advantage of the rebounding. -
Dr. KnOiTaLL
Not to mention, we lost the offensive rebounding battle when we won at home.HighRoller74;1731493 wrote:I agree. But for whatever reason when the other team goes small, we tend to match them, instead of exploiting our advantage. -
Commander of Awesome
Holy shit numbnuts, just bc you didn't put a question mark at the end of your self serving douche comment doesn't mean I can't respond. You said, "unless anyone want to hear it".lhslep134;1731457 wrote:Yeah, it's a reach-fail on my part because you didn't comprehend the difference between a question, where I'm asking for feedback, and a statement, where I'm not.
Whatever floats your boat.
But srsly you should take that reading comprehension class with Webbie.
I told you literally no one did. You got butt hurt bc you think you're so important and everyone wants to hear your bloviating bs. Well sorry lil guy, most ppl skip right past your tl;dr posts. lolfail -
BR1986FBLooks like the Cavs almost weren't the Cavs when they were first created....
http://mentalfloss.com/article/52318/25-rejected-nicknames-professional-sports-teams -
rydawg5Golden isn't even a real state
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk -
lhslep134COA, I can't help that you have a reading comprehension problem. I shouldn't have to explain more than once that the language "i'm not going to do something unless.." means I'm actually not going to go do whatever that something is until someone affirmatively requests that I do. I shouldn't have to explain to you more than once why that statement means I'm perfectly content if no one cares enough about that topic to want my analysis.
But you had to open your mouth like a jackass and look stupid doing it. And now you're refusing to acknowledge the impropriety of your interpretation and in turn causing me to have to explain it once again.
I stand by my statement you and webby should be classmates.
Maybe if it you weren't so excited about "pwn"ing someone with lolfail or "lil guy" or whatever language you use to get off you'd be able to more fully comprehend other people's posts.