Archive

Tribe Offseason Thread

  • Dr. KnOiTaLL
    Laley23;1716266 wrote:This makes me smile
    That looks good on my fantasy team...
  • Laley23
    Dr. KnOiTaLL;1716273 wrote:That looks good on my fantasy team...
    Good for you. lol.

    But seriously, velocity is great to see. No walks is great to see. Hits and Ks are nice, but tough to judge without knowing competition. But, damn, the velocity and control is great.
  • Dr. KnOiTaLL
    Laley23;1716279 wrote:Good for you. lol.

    But seriously, velocity is great to see. No walks is great to see. Hits and Ks are nice, but tough to judge without knowing competition. But, damn, the velocity and control is great.
    Definitely an encouraging sign. Although, against minor league hitters. Control is huge, though. Limit the free passes, and he's looking at a promising season ahead.
  • lhslep134
    HitsRus;1716260 wrote:I would agree with most of this, except the phrase "dime a dozen" doesn't really reflect the value of good relief pitching, although it does speak to the relative ease that good relievers can be obtained.
    Precisely.
  • Laley23
    Good relievers are a dime a dozen in the sense that there are a ton of them out there. Finding one in an "on" year is another thing lol. I would never want to trade for a reliever unless it's a multiple-year proven stud/someone in the middle
    of a great year at the deadline. And I would never trade an everyday Ayer as good as Kipnis is under his contract for one unless I thought it was a major missing piece to a potential title.
  • Commander of Awesome
    Pick6;1716241 wrote:I know because of common sense dick face.
    lol he mad

    So you know based on nothing. Your posting has proven your complete lack of self awareness/common sense. (See gun thread). lolfail
  • lhslep134
    Commander of Awesome;1716326 wrote:lol he mad

    So you know based on nothing. Your posting has proven your complete lack of self awareness/common sense. (See gun thread). lolfail
    He also interpreted me saying I went to Suns, Cardinals, and D-Backs games and not being an Arizona fan as a contradiction to me being a University of Arizona fan, blatantly disregarding that I attended law school and worked for the athletic department there.

    Because mentioning pro teams is inclusive of local college teams...

    What a f'ing dumbass. Under that logic I must be a Mount Union fan because I like the Indians, Browns, and Cavs.
  • Pick6
    I pray I can be half of the internet tough guy you two are one day.
  • lhslep134
    Pick6;1716332 wrote:I'll keep you two in my prayers. I wish I could be half the internet tough guy you are.
    Convenient for you to say, because in career-wise you can't come halfway close to sniffing my jock.
  • Pick6
    lhslep134;1716334 wrote:Convenient for you to say, because in career-wise you can't come halfway close to sniffing my jock.
    LOL. Please keep going.
  • ohiobucks1
    To get us back on topic:


    When is Kipnis supposed to be back?
  • Footwedge
    Laley23;1716324 wrote:Good relievers are a dime a dozen in the sense that there are a ton of them out there. Finding one in an "on" year is another thing lol. I would never want to trade for a reliever unless it's a multiple-year proven stud/someone in the middle
    of a great year at the deadline. And I would never trade an everyday Ayer as good as Kipnis is under his contract for one unless I thought it was a major missing piece to a potential title.
    Good relievers are a dime a dozen? Yeah...and according to Ray Farmer good receivers are a dime a dozen too. Look, would love to see Kipnis have a bounce back year. But last April, they signed him up for over 60 million. You want .240 and 6 homers from that type of investment? Not to mention mediocre in the field. The guy was awful last year pure and simple. How quick we forget the Hafners, Swishers, and Sizemores of the world.

    Would love to find a 7th inning guy in case Shaw blows this year.
  • lhslep134
    Footwedge's stupefying ignorance is hilarious, sad, and yet completely par for the course for the 'ole dumb codger. Had to copy and paste since I don't know how many of you are ESPN Insiders but this article is from 2010. So Footwedge has been living in sheer ignorance about relief pitchers for at least that long.
    The Setup

    Once upon a time in baseball, it was easy to find a great pitcher to pitch the sixth and seventh inning. He was known as …
    Tonight's starting pitcher.

    But nowadays? Uh, it's not quite so easy. Is it?
    Here in modern, 21st-century baseball, those innings are being pitched by the scariest, least reliable, least predictable members of any team -- the middle relievers. So in theory, those middle relievers can make a team's whole season.
    Or they can get everyone fired except the grounds crew.
    So if you're drawing up a formula for how to win, you obviously need to accumulate as many effective middle-relief kind of guys as possible, right? Right. Every GM knows that. But here's what they don't know:
    How the heck they're supposed to do that.
    Just this week, I asked a very sharp, very experienced general manager if, after exhaustive study on this exact subject, he now knew how to evaluate middle relievers.
    "No," he replied succinctly, "because no one does."
    And he's right. Middle relief is, by far, the most volatile position in baseball. And we're about to prove it.

    The Proof

    Everyone in baseball knows what a great slugger looks like. And everyone knows what a great starting pitcher looks like. But apparently, nobody knows what a great middle reliever looks like.
    Why? Because middle relievers are like the weather. They might look great today. They might look great tomorrow. But that never, ever means they'll still be looking great the next day. Or week. Or month. Or year. And, of course, vice versa.
    Example No. 1: Consider this list of names -- Miguel Batista … Danys Baez … Octavio Dotel … J.J. Putz … Scot Shields … Justin Speier … Scott Linebrink … J.C. Romero … Brandon Lyon … Kyle Farnsworth … and David Riske.
    OK, so what do those 11 men have in common? Correct answer: They were the 11 highest-paid set-up relievers in baseball in 2009 -- i.e., the only 11 set-up men with salaries of $4.25 million or higher.
    So of those 11, how many would you guess (A) had an ERA under 4.00 and (B) stayed off the disabled list all season?
    Correct answer: exactly two of them -- Dotel and Lyon. So if their teams had it to do over again, think they'd pay that group more than $60 million again? Eh, probably not.
    All right, ready for Example No. 2? I ranked all the set-up relievers in baseball in ERA for last season, then took a closer look at the top 25 (with at least 30 innings pitched). Ready for the breakdown of that group?
    BEST IN THE MIDDLE

    Top 10 middle relief ERAs in 2009:
    Pitcher Team ERA
    Mike
    Adams
    S.D. 0.73 (Released in spring training '07)
    Scott
    Eyre
    Phi. 1.50 (In '08, designated for assignment)
    Jeremy
    Affeldt
    S.F. 1.73 (6.30 ERA in '06)
    Claudio
    Vargas
    LAD/Mil. 1.74 (Released in spring training '08)
    Neftali
    Feliz
    Tex. 1.74 (Rookie)
    Darren
    O'Day
    Tex. 1.84 (Claimed on waivers, April '09)
    Kiko
    Calero
    Fla. 1.95 (Signed as non-roster free agent)
    Blake
    Hawksworth
    St.L. 2.03 (Rookie)
    Ronald
    Belisario
    LAD 2.04 (Rookie, released by Pirates in '08)
    Trever
    Miller
    St.L. 2.06 (4.86 ERA in '07)
    [/FONT][/COLOR]
    Five pitchers on that list were rookies. But of the other 20 …
    Two had gotten released. … Three had either been designated for assignment or flat-out dumped by their previous team. … One was claimed on waivers. … One had been non-tendered. … Two had either failed a physical or had major surgery. … Two were signed as non-roster free agents.
    And every one of the other 10 had had an ERA in the vicinity of 5.00 or higher sometime, some place, between 2006 and 2008.
    But by last season, their light bulbs had flicked back on, and bam -- they all had tremendous years. Great. Now anybody want to bet on how many will do it again?
    Not the men who have to trudge out into the market and decide which of these fellows is worth paying 3 or 4 million bucks to. Those people scare all GMs to death.
    "Without a doubt," said an NL general manager, "these are the toughest guys in baseball to evaluate, because of all the players out there and all the situations out there, they're the toughest to read from afar. Think about it. You know what a starting pitcher is supposed to do. You know what a closer is supposed to do. But you can't read a middle reliever. You don't know who he faced, what the game situation was, what the game dynamic was. It's hard to know any of that from afar."
    "The first thing you've got to remember," said another GM, "is they're relievers for a reason. The reason they become relievers in the first place is because they have some flaws. They don't have a third pitch. They can't repeat their delivery. They've got an unorthodox arm angle. So we made them relievers -- because if we had a choice, we'd make them starters. Just the fact that we made them relievers means you're looking at an imperfect crop to begin with."
    Nevertheless, somebody has to pitch those innings. But even after all these years, it's hard to find anyone in baseball who has figured out a dependable formula for picking the right guys to do that. Which leads us to …
  • lhslep134
    The rest
    [h=2]The Conclusion[/h]Draw straws. Throw darts. Spin a wheel. Ask a psychic. What the heck. You have as good a chance of picking out the next great middle reliever that way as you do by asking your scouts, or Bill James.
    "Let me tell you something," said one of the GMs quoted above. "If you ever hear of a guy being touted as a great relief-pitching prospect, you have got to be kidding me. There's probably less than a 50-50 chance he'll even be a useful pitcher in the big leagues."
    Yep. The record shows it. Not only are middle relievers the most volatile position in baseball, there's nothing else even close. Nothing.
    Starting pitching would be a distant No. 2, said one GM, "just because there's so much attrition, so many injuries." But there is such a phenomenon as a starter who's actually good every year.CC Sabathia … Roy Halladay … Greg Maddux … etc.
    But try to find a non-closing relief pitcher who's healthy and effective every year, especially in the post-PED era. Good luck.
    Now there's one more logical reason for all that hotness and coldness. And it might just explain everything:
    There's no player in baseball more likely to get seriously abused and overused than a middle relief pitcher who, by some miracle, is having a big year.
    "You're using these guys to connect two really important parts of the game -- from the starter's part of the game to the guy who's closing the game," said another GM. "So these guys are getting used a lot. They get up [to warm up] 100 times a year. And they get in the game 75 times a year. So if you have to burn a guy out, who are you going to burn out? The guy who isn't making as much money as the other guys.
    "It's true. Think about it. You'll hear a lot: 'We can't get the closer up another day.' Or: 'We can't have our starters pitch on short rest.' But you rarely hear that the 12th guy on your staff, who's pitched the sixth inning the last six games, isn't available today."
    Yessir, those middle men are always available -- until the manager breaks out in hives at the thought of bringing them in there. So what we have here is practically a self-fulfilling cycle: Pitch well, pitch a lot, get tired, break down, pitch lousy, pitch less, recharge, get healthy, get hot, pitch well, pass go, collect $2 million, start this over.
    So factor all that in and tell us: How do you find a good middle reliever?
    "It's almost reverse psychology," laughed one NL executive. "If a guy just had a good year, you don't trade for him or sign him. But if a guy had a bad year, you do."
    Hey, makes as much sense as any theory we've heard -- when you're dealing with the most volatile position in baseball. It's either that or get out those darts.
  • lhslep134
    Oh and footwedge your continued "shemp" jokes are more sad than anything because you keep coming back to them even though I have no idea who he is, ergo it's not insulting in the least.

    But keep using it, because the only thing your "insult" does is show how dated you are.
  • BRF
    What a great quote!


    "Once upon a time in baseball, it was easy to find a great pitcher to pitch the sixth and seventh inning. He was known as …Tonight's starting pitcher."

    Also funny: you don't know who Shemp is! :-)



  • lhslep134
    BRF;1716421 wrote:

    Also funny: you don't know who Shemp is! :-)



    If my "show how dated you are" comment offended you I'm sorry! It was only meant to be a dig at FW
  • Footwedge
    lhslep134;1716376 wrote:The rest

    [/I][/I][/I][/I][/FONT][/COLOR]
    Way to go Shemp. You outdid yourself. Great job. Take a well deserved bow. Scary to think that you actually practice law. Only in America. Keep flapping your lips about relief pitchers. Rivera...dime a dozen. Suter? Sisposable waste. Eck? Worthless. Bill James can rim my dung hole. You people act like he is some kind of baseball deity. Just another Mel Kiper Jr. peddling his nonsensical wares. Oh by the way...How'd Uballso fare last year? You know, the "can't miss" clown you fapped to.
  • Footwedge
    BRF;1716421 wrote:What a great quote!


    "Once upon a time in baseball, it was easy to find a great pitcher to pitch the sixth and seventh inning. He was known as …Tonight's starting pitcher."

    Also funny: you don't know who Shemp is! :-)
    The way it used to be...no 7th, 8th, or ninth inning specialists. The starter went deep...completed a boatload of games. If needed



    [/QUOTE]
    The way it used to be...no 7th, 8th, or ninth inning specialists. The starter went deep...completed a boatload of games. If needed, the best availablr relief guy would come in and pitch 2, 3, 4 inning saves. Whitey Ford would go 6 and a third, and Louie Arroyo would finish it up. Same with Bruce Sutter. The good pen people would log 110..120...130 innings...and there were no jackoffs around like Bill James to criticize.
  • TBone14
    Kipnis tweeted yesterday that the back was feeling good but no reason to rush it at this time of year.

    I am really looking forward to this year. Not only for Tribe baseball but for the Tribe baseball discussion on here. We have it all covered. Optimists and pessimists. Logical and illogical. People in the middle. It would be pretty boring if we all agreed all of the time.
  • HitsRus
    Salazar pounded by Reds yesterday.
    Lindor optioned to minor league camp.
  • IggyPride00
    Lindor is ready to be on the big league roster.

    I sometimes wish that everyone involved would stop insulting the fans intelligence and just admit it's about "team control" and not his level of readiness to be in the big leagues.
  • like_that
    I was just talking to a buddy how i hate what the media has become. It reminded me of the time Albert Belle didn't win the MVP in 1995. http://bleacherreport.com/articles/249555-baseballs-10-best-mvp-snub-seasons/page/11

    I don't get how the media has that much power. Only a moron would say he didn't deserve the MVP.
  • Gardens35
    Salazar optioned to the Clippers.
  • Commander of Awesome
    Fuck I hate the cheap ass dolans. Dumb fucks.

    Top 5 in non athlete ppl in sports I'd like to beat the shit out.

    1. Modell (may he rot in hell)
    2. Goodell (scumbag hypocrite POS)
    3. Shannahan
    4. Jason LaFailtora (stop bitching about the browns fucking your GF numbnuts)
    5. Dolans. (Lee, Sabathia, payroll, etc.....)