2012 Cleveland Browns thread: AKA Pat Shurmur Memorial thread
-
like_that
This guy actually took the time to write an article on why Manning won't come to the Browns? LOL
-
like_that
Link?Commander of Awesome;1066063 wrote:This is a different tune than your usual QQing about not resigning him. -
BR1986FB
This guys stuff is actually really solid.like_that;1066064 wrote:This guy actually took the time to write an article on why Manning won't come to the Browns? LOL -
like_that
I don't doubt it, just think its funny he wrote an article regarding that specific topic.BR1986FB;1066070 wrote:This guys stuff is actually really solid. -
Commander of Awesome
Go back and read your posts regarding resigning Hillis. You and BR have been driving the "we gotta resign Hillis so we don't have another hole to fill" train.like_that;1066067 wrote:Link? -
Commander of Awesome
Gotta disagree with you here. He used to head "The Dawg Scooper". The only good articles he ever wrote were during TC where he gave stats from the 7 on 7s. Reading his other work is basically him just rehashing what Rizzo says on the radio.BR1986FB;1066070 wrote:This guys stuff is actually really solid. -
like_that
Burden of proof is on you, thanks.Commander of Awesome;1066074 wrote:Go back and read your posts regarding resigning Hillis. You and BR have been driving the "we gotta resign Hillis so we don't have another hole to fill" train.
Also, I want Hillis to come back, so heckert/holmgren don't even think about drafting Richardson. Huge difference from what you are saying. Do you want to draft Richardson with the 4th pick?
Nice reach fail. -
BR1986FB
What? Resigning Hillis would be a luxury. I'm indifferent on whether they bring him back or not. To me, he's another injury prone Hardesty except he has one fluke 1000 yard season to his credit. I doubt the guy eclipses 1000 again in his career. If they don't have to overpay, fine, but they can get a good back with a 2nd or 3rd rounder.Commander of Awesome;1066074 wrote:Go back and read your posts regarding resigning Hillis. You and BR have been driving the "we gotta resign Hillis so we don't have another hole to fill" train. -
like_that
I feel this way as well.BR1986FB;1066088 wrote:What? Resigning Hillis would be a luxury. I'm indifferent on whether they bring him back or not. To me, he's another injury prone Hardesty except he has one fluke 1000 yard season to his credit. I doubt the guy eclipses 1000 again in his career. If they don't have to overpay, fine, but they can get a good back with a 2nd or 3rd rounder. -
BR1986FB
Exactly.like_that;1066086 wrote:Burden of proof is on you, thanks.
Also, I want Hillis to come back, so heckert/holmgren don't even think about drafting Richardson. Huge difference from what you are saying. Do you want to draft Richardson with the 4th pick?
Nice reach fail.
I don't want them going anywhere near Richardson with that 4th pick. Now if he falls to 15, they see value and want to trade up, I'd be ok with that. -
chippy10wanna bet that if the browns guy isn't there, they will trade down for more picks lol.
-
like_that
Wouldn't be opposed at all. A lot of people here want to make the home run pick, but if it's not there, why try and force it?chippy10;1066111 wrote:wanna bet that if the browns guy isn't there, they will trade down for more picks lol. -
Commander of AwesomeI dont think Hillis is the catalyst for drafting Richardson or not. Regardless of Hillis situation I highly doubt we draft Richardson at #4.
-
BTrev
All I did, was ask a legit question. Someone isn't much of a morning person.Commander of Awesome;1066037 wrote:They can upgrade and add depth to any and every position. Christ if you're going to be so damn generic. Also go back and look or do some research through google on who's available. I don't have time to type every FA out for your convenience.
Why so grouchy?
Also, I'm talking Stallworth pre-2008... when he was with New Orleans, Philadelphia, and New England. Stallworth from 2008 on has been a bum. -
Commander of Awesome
No you didn't. You asked who was going to be available in FA. Google it or go back and look yourself. Not that hard.BTrev;1066118 wrote:All I did, was ask a legit question. Someone isn't much of a morning person. -
BR1986FBI posted the link for available free agents from Football's Future.
-
Commander of Awesome
Pretty obvious he didn't even bother to click it. Wants us to do everything for him.BR1986FB;1066126 wrote:I posted the link for available free agents from Football's Future. -
BTrev
Thank you.
-
BTrev
Don't be such a presumptual hard ass. I did ask who was out there... but I also asked who everyone wanted... and all I got was Pierre Garcon. lolCommander of Awesome;1066135 wrote:Pretty obvious he didn't even bother to click it. Wants us to do everything for him. -
se-alum
You raggin'?Commander of Awesome;1066120 wrote:No you didn't. You asked who was going to be available in FA. Google it or go back and look yourself. Not that hard. -
BR1986FBA lot of WR's on that list. I think the Browns will get one of them. More like a Manningham, Garcon, Meachem, Laurent Robinson type than a Colston, Bowe, etc. I think Heckert will make a play for Desean Jackson just due to their familiarity, if D-Jax isn't franchised.
-
SportsAndLadyDrink some cranberry juice, COA
-
BTrev
Yep.BR1986FB;1066148 wrote:A lot of WR's on that list. I think the Browns will get one of them. More like a Manningham, Garcon, Meachem, Laurent Robinson type than a Colston, Bowe, etc. I think Heckert will make a play for Desean Jackson just due to their familiarity, if D-Jax isn't franchised. -
royal_k
I would tale Laurent Robinson in a heartbeat.BR1986FB;1066148 wrote:A lot of WR's on that list. I think the Browns will get one of them. More like a Manningham, Garcon, Meachem, Laurent Robinson type than a Colston, Bowe, etc. I think Heckert will make a play for Desean Jackson just due to their familiarity, if D-Jax isn't franchised. -
Commander of Awesomese-alum;1066147 wrote:You raggin'?
Good one! and creative! /sarcasm.SportsAndLady;1066152 wrote:Drink some cranberry juice, COA