Archive

2015 Ohio State Football Discussion

  • lhslep134
    WebFire;1721162 wrote:Correct. An SEC tactic you all used to loathe.
    Forcing one, maybe two kids to transfer if he wants to play or agreeing to a medical hardship is not an SEC tactic. Is it a tactic used by almost every Big 5 team.

    Oversigning by 10 kids and then getting rid of a bunch year to year, which is a different tactic, is an SEC tactic that people still loathe.
  • Scarlet_Buckeye
    WebFire;1721162 wrote:Correct. An SEC tactic you all used to loathe.
    sleeper;1721163 wrote:Well at least Michigan holds itself to the highest standards and wouldn't put a concussed kid on the field.
    DING, DING, DING, DING, DING!!! We have a winner...
  • WebFire
    lhslep134;1721173 wrote:Forcing one, maybe two kids to transfer if he wants to play or agreeing to a medical hardship is not an SEC tactic. Is it a tactic used by almost every Big 5 team.

    Oversigning by 10 kids and then getting rid of a bunch year to year, which is a different tactic, is an SEC tactic that people still loathe.
    But what OSU is doing to this kid is exactly how those SEC schools do it.
  • Midstate01
    Webbies butthurt is always hilarious. Anything to make yourself feel like Michigan is better than osu at something.

    I'm sure Harbaugh won't tell anyone, hey you might wanna look around and think about transferring...

    This case isn't what Webbie wants it to be. Yet he will just keep trying to make it that way.
  • WebFire
    What did I claim Michigan was good at again?

    Love that OSU fans can't stand to converse with someone because they are a UM fan. Grow up.
  • Automatik
    WebFire;1721166 wrote:Really? It's pretty obvious if you read above.
    Can you answer the question? What did we "all loathe"?

    You think we don't notice your passive aggressive shots? LOL
  • WebFire
    Automatik;1721179 wrote:Can you answer the question? What did we "all loathe"?

    You think we don't notice your passive aggressive shots? LOL
    Um, I told you exactly what you loathed. Are you even reading the thread? LOL
  • WebFire
    Automatik;1721179 wrote:Can you answer the question? What did we "all loathe"?

    You think we don't notice your passive aggressive shots? LOL
    They aren't shots, they are opinions.
  • WebFire
    Like the opinion that you are blind if you don't think Meyer does some form of over signing.

    Last 5 years...

    OSU - 123 recruits
    Mich - 102
    MSU - 101
    Wisc - 96

    All while OSU was under scholly reductions for what, 2-3 years. LOL
  • Lovejoy1984
    How many transfers did we have, or how many were academically ineligible?

    I recall quite a few transferred, and/or were found ineligible.
    Bell, Mitchell, Pittman, Connor, T. Johnson, to name a few. Don't remember hearing many injury hardships(outside of Trey)
  • Lovejoy1984
    I got bored....

    James Louis
    TY Williams
    David Druham
    Jamel Turner
    Scott McVey
    Chad Hagan
    Verlon Reed
    Taylor Graham

    All from the 2010 Class who transferred, or removed from team for Discipline/Academics.

    So it isn't as if we're ruling half the recruits hurt, which is what people dislike about the SEC(Bama)
  • sleeper
    Noah Spence
  • Midstate01
    HighRoller74;1721185 wrote:I got bored....

    James Louis
    TY Williams
    David Druham
    Jamel Turner
    Scott McVey
    Chad Hagan
    Verlon Reed
    Taylor Graham

    All from the 2010 Class who transferred, or removed from team for Discipline/Academics.

    So it isn't as if we're ruling half the recruits hurt, which is what people dislike about the SEC(Bama)
    Don't prove him wrong.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
  • Lovejoy1984
  • Scarlet_Buckeye
    HighRoller74;1721185 wrote:I got bored....

    James Louis
    TY Williams
    David Druham
    Jamel Turner
    Scott McVey
    Chad Hagan
    Verlon Reed
    Taylor Graham

    All from the 2010 Class who transferred, or removed from team for Discipline/Academics.

    So it isn't as if we're ruling half the recruits hurt, which is what people dislike about the SEC(Bama)
    Webbie - what's your retort?
  • HitsRus
    But what OSU is doing to this kid is exactly how those SEC schools do it.
    Except that the kid still has a full ride, and that's a huge difference. The College is honoring it's committment to it's promise of a 4year scholarship.He gets a free college education....at worst. At what point do colleges have to accept damaged goods? The kid had two knee injuries after his signing. Even if you're totally healthy, there is no guarantee that you'll ever get in a game anyway. OSU has honored it's financial committment, and it's not restricting the kid from leaving if he finds an offer.
    My point is that you offered for him to play at your school and you responded by saying he can, at another school. That makes no sense lol
    ...hope that answers it for you.
  • Al Bundy
    WebFire;1721182 wrote:
    Last 5 years...

    OSU - 123 recruits
    Mich - 102
    MSU - 101
    Wisc - 96
    In other words, QQ because kids don't want to go to that school up north.
  • SportsAndLady
    Damn, webbie getting bent over.
  • lhslep134
    HitsRus;1721196 wrote:
    ...hope that answers it for you.
    It doesn't answer it. Your post is just a confirmation of what I already said, that Ohio State is offering to fulfill its financial commitment and I'm OK with the situation because of that. But in my post I stated 2 parts to their original commitment (1) a scholarship (financial aid) (2) to play football at your (Ohio State) school. Ohio State can no longer fulfill their original commitment. Again, that's fine, but that's not what you said.

    You said that he could get that at another school. It's not logically possible for another school to give him the same commitment: financial aid and a spot on Ohio State's team. That's why I said your response made no sense, it's impossible.

    Hope that explains why your response doesn't answer it for me.
  • HitsRus
    I'm not sure...and neither are you...what Ohio State committed to, but a scholarship to play football is not necessarily a guaranteed spot on the team. While I feelz for the kid, OSU is being pretty honorable in giving the kid a free college education for just signing to play there. It is one thing if the kid was injured on an OSU football field during practice, but OSU does not have the obligation to rehab this kid and reserve a spot on the team for him for injuries sustained prior to his matriculation, or for injuries sustained outside their control. They did nothing out of the ordinary or standard....but because they are over the limit on scholarships, haters are looking to call them on it a being "unfair". Even if the were at the exact amount, and this kid was injured, don't they have the right to take the "football" part of his scholly away and give it to a kid who can contribute?

    http://www.collegesportsscholarships.com/2014/10/17/it-is-not-all-about-the-scholarship.htm

    It's all about feelz in this case.... the kid has a 4 year ride worth $100,000.....and if he doesn't want it, he can go elsewhere without restriction.
  • WebFire
    Scarlet_Buckeye;1721194 wrote:Webbie - what's your retort?
    8 kids from 1 single class forced away because they weren't good enough.

    SEC! SEC! SEC!
  • WebFire
    SportsAndLady;1721221 wrote:Damn, webbie getting bent over.
    How so? It's so comical how OSU fans ripped Meyer at Florida, but he does it at OSU and it's ok. The excuses are hilarious.

    "He's an asshole, but he's our asshole."
  • WebFire
    Al Bundy;1721219 wrote:In other words, QQ because kids don't want to go to that school up north.
    Or any B1G school apparently?
  • WebFire
    HitsRus;1721196 wrote:The College is honoring it's committment to it's promise of a 4year scholarship..
    The commitment was for a 4 year athletic scholarship. Why would you not let him rehab and see what happens. Kid barely got on campus early and they tell him he can't play for them ever.

    That's shitty.