Archive

Will you watch?

  • bigkahuna
    Here's what I will watch

    Rose Bowl-Oregon vs. Wisconsin
    Sugar-Michigan vs. Va. Tech
    Orange- Clemson vs. West Virginia
    Fiesta-Stanford vs. Oklahoma State

    Probably the best one
  • cats gone wild
    wes_mantooth;1001865 wrote: Of course I would watch OSU/Michigan...I am an OSU fan. You make very little sense.
    Read the last line in my post. You guys wouldnt of whined about that rematch. So, whats the difference this year, except that they are actually putting the 2 best teams in.
  • wes_mantooth
    Yeah, the Stanford/OSU game has the most upside. I will probably watch the Rose Bowl...might be exciting.
  • trep14
    I won't be watching. Just doesn't really interest me. BCS is getting bbqed on twitter right now. Their handle @everygamecounts couldn't be more of a fallacy.
  • wes_mantooth
    cats gone wild;1001871 wrote:Read the last line in my post. You guys wouldnt of whined about that rematch. So, whats the difference this year, except that they are actually putting the 2 best teams in.
    sigh, you are hopeless.
  • cats gone wild
    wes_mantooth;1001882 wrote:sigh, you are hopeless.
    Way to avoid. Thought so.
  • Manhattan Buckeye
    The NCAA is getting served. Hopefully this will lead to a playoff. Who (other than Gary Danielson) wants to see a rematch of a terrible game, even if in CBS' and Danielson's opinions Alabama is better than the Green Bay Packers.
  • WebFire
    se-alum;1001862 wrote:Why does it bother you that some will choose not to watch the game. You're seemingly taking it personal.
    I don't care if they do or not, but I think most of them are liars.
  • Con_Alma
    Are people upset because they don't think the two best teams are in or are they upset because they have already seen them play and it wasn't a high scoring affair?
  • WebFire
    Funny part is people who don't want a playoff are now whining about a rematch in BCS. Have a playoff and this doesn't happen (or at least if it does it's legit).

    Edit: not referring to anyone here, just in general.
  • wes_mantooth
    cats gone wild;1001887 wrote:Way to avoid. Thought so.
    avoid what? I get that you troll...everyone gets it. You are actually asshurt that a bunch of people you don't know aren't going to watch your team play. LSU is the best team in the country, but no one wants to watch them play Bama again. You are asking me if I would be whining if my team played Michigan...it didn't happen...and I didn't complain when they played Florida. You are so dense it is truly amazing....well not really amazing, but it is funny.
  • Fly4Fun
    I said nope, and that means I won't go out of my way to watch it like I normally do. If nothing else is going on I'd probably have it on in the background. But that's about it.
  • Crimson streak
    That's cause he is confused cause he's a lsu and a sec fan so he doesn't know who to root for so his head is going to explode
  • Manhattan Buckeye
    Con_Alma;1001897 wrote:Are people upset because they don't think the two best teams are in or are they upset because they have already seen them play and it wasn't a high scoring affair?
    Both. Alabama played a crap schedule. They can't be blamed for not playing the two best teams in the SEC east, since they didn't have a say in that decision. They can be blamed for scheduling a I-AA team and two other cupcakes.

    Also, the first game was terrible. It was crazy how the SEC sycophants were calling it a "classic" showing "SEC speed" and "great defense" - when in reality if a dumbass kicker could make more than 2 FGs out of 6 the game would have gone in the other direction.
  • se-alum
    So what if 'Bama wins, can you actually call them National Champions being that LSU has already beat them? If LSU wins, we still haven't learned anything because we knew LSU was better than 'Bama. It's a NCG that serves no purpose.
  • wes_mantooth
    se-alum;1001919 wrote:So what if 'Bama wins, can you actually call them National Champions being that LSU has already beat them? If LSU wins, we still haven't learned anything because we knew LSU was better than 'Bama. It's a NCG that serves no purpose.
    Yeah, you are punishing LSU by giving them this matchup. They took care of business once...now they have to do it again.
  • xKoToVxSyNdRoMe
    ts1227;1001705 wrote:I'll watch whoever is in it because I'm not a whiny bitch.
    Rotinaj;1001724 wrote:Lol +1. So much qq these days in this forum.
    These.
  • Scarlet_Fever
    cats gone wild;1001871 wrote:Read the last line in my post. You guys wouldnt of whined about that rematch. So, whats the difference this year, except that they are actually putting the 2 best teams in.
    Actually most OSU fans said that M*ch*gan didn't deserve a rematch. They had their shot and we wanted someone new. That Urban Cryer whined his way in and we OSU fans got what we wanted.:D
    WebFire;1001902 wrote:Funny part is people who don't want a playoff are now whining about a rematch in BCS. Have a playoff and this doesn't happen (or at least if it does it's legit).
    My orginal post mentions this. If we had a playoff system then fine rematch away it happens. But the BSC supporters claim it makes the whole season a "playoff" and we've already seen this game. Give someone new a shot or go to a playoff system.
  • Con_Alma
    Manhattan Buckeye;1001918 wrote:Both. Alabama played a crap schedule. They can't be blamed for not playing the two best teams in the SEC east, since they didn't have a say in that decision. They can be blamed for scheduling a I-AA team and two other cupcakes.

    Also, the first game was terrible. It was crazy how the SEC sycophants were calling it a "classic" showing "SEC speed" and "great defense" - when in reality if a dumbass kicker could make more than 2 FGs out of 6 the game would have gone in the other direction.
    You think LSU & Alabama are not the two best teams then. Is that correct?
  • Zombaypirate
    Con_Alma;1001897 wrote:Are people upset because they don't think the two best teams are in or are they upset because they have already seen them play and it wasn't a high scoring affair?
    I think both. On top of that that we have been lied too. We have told over and over ad nauseum, that the regular season is a playoff. In playoffs teams go home after they lose.

    They lied and then offering the crap other BCS bowl games is pretty sickening. (save for Ok St vs Stanford) which might be a good game but on paper seems like a good matchup.
  • WebFire
    se-alum;1001919 wrote:So what if 'Bama wins, can you actually call them National Champions being that LSU has already beat them? If LSU wins, we still haven't learned anything because we knew LSU was better than 'Bama. It's a NCG that serves no purpose.
    Would MSU have been B1G champs if they won last night?
  • dlazz
    Mulva;1001640 wrote:it's the national championship game.
    the national championship game is OSU/LSU. What we got is a #1 vs #3.
  • Manhattan Buckeye
    Con_Alma;1001936 wrote:You think LSU & Alabama are not the two best teams then. Is that correct?
    I think Okie St. should have got the nod over Bama. If LSU and Bama are the 2 best teams then a playoff would evidence that. I'm not overly impressed with Bama's record this year, not to the point where I would definitively say they are better than Okie St. (or other teams, like Stanford).

    I have no idea how anyone can definitively say Bama is the second best team.
  • se-alum
    WebFire;1001941 wrote:Would MSU have been B1G champs if they won last night?
    Yes. Are you comparing a game that 2 teams HAVE to play in to a game where the BCS got to choose who played?
  • WebFire
    se-alum;1001952 wrote:Yes. Are you comparing a game that 2 teams HAVE to play in to a game where the BCS got to choose who played?
    So? Your point would still apply to the B1G championship.