Archive

Disgusted with Trump administration - Part I

  • isadore
    O-Trap;1856764 wrote:Once again, you show your overt racism against Germans and Russians for something their ancestors did.
    gosh a ruddies, countries have histories. Only the foolish do not learn and adjust policies based on those histories.
  • O-Trap
    isadore;1856768 wrote:gosh a ruddies, countries have histories. Only the foolish do not learn and adjust policies based on those histories.
    Only a racist stereotypes people by the actions of other people who happen to share their heritage.

    Congratulations on the realization of your racism.
  • isadore
    O-Trap;1856770 wrote:Only a racist stereotypes people by the actions of other people who happen to share their heritage.

    Congratulations on the realization of your racism.
    gosh a ruddies, nations have history whether you like it or not.
  • O-Trap
    isadore;1856774 wrote:gosh a ruddies, nations have history whether you like it or not.
    Nice red herring. You're still a racist.
  • isadore
    O-Trap;1856775 wrote:Nice red herring. You're still a racist.
    gosh a ruddies any excuse for your continuing refusal to understand the importance of history.
  • O-Trap
    isadore;1856779 wrote:gosh a ruddies any excuse for your continuing refusal to understand the importance of history.
    Just another justification for racially-driven authority.

    By all means, please continue defending your racism.
  • isadore
    O-Trap;1856781 wrote:Just another justification for racially-driven authority.

    By all means, please continue defending your racism.
    gosh a ruddies, continue your false charges. American foreign policy should reflect the history of nations.
  • O-Trap
    isadore;1856783 wrote:gosh a ruddies, continue your false charges. American foreign policy should reflect the history of nations.
    In other words, we should treat individuals in countries as though they will behave the same way prior people from their country did ... because they're from that country.

    In context, you're saying this: We should treat the German leaders and people like they're just as prone to attempting military expansion and fascism as they were in the 1920s and 1930s ... just because they're German.

    You don't get much more racist than that. That's not a false charge. It's what your own statements tell the world about your beliefs.
  • CenterBHSFan
    O-Trap;1856753 wrote:Meh, it's fun.

    Like I said: masochism.
    XD
    I know
    superman;1856758 wrote:Isaderp would have to step his game up several levels to be a shitlord. Also, typically, SJWs like Isaderp, are on the opposite end of the spectrum from shitlords.
    Isa is from Derpistan, which is, according to the atlas, a polar opposite from Kekistan.

    As far as Germany goes: All countries have a past and those pasts can be considered. But it shouldn't be a ruling factor. Germany should have just as much right to leave the EU and/or NATO - just like any other country. If that's what they want to do.
  • isadore
    O-Trap;1856811 wrote:In other words, we should treat individuals in countries as though they will behave the same way prior people from their country did ... because they're from that country.

    In context, you're saying this: We should treat the German leaders and people like they're just as prone to attempting military expansion and fascism as they were in the 1920s and 1930s ... just because they're German.

    You don't get much more racist than that. That's not a false charge. It's what your own statements tell the world about your beliefs.
    gosh a ruddies, you continue to present an argument for ignorance and try to call it tolerance. Nations have histories and only a fool doesn't consider those histories in dealing with those nations. The histories of Russia and Germany should be considered, not ignored. You and your idiot President should reconsider undermining the western alliance.
  • sleeper
    Alright back to discussing the President and why we are disgusted.

    Comey to testify on Thursday, June 8th, regarding his interactions with Trump and potential obstruction of justice. It will be broadcast on C-Span and a variety of other networks live at 10am EST. I encourage anyone who cares about this country to watch the unfiltered testimony from the horse's mouth rather than the spin of your respective news networks. Remember, this testimony will be under oath.
  • QuakerOats
    Can't wait for the networks to quickly scramble to return to regularly scheduled programming when his statements don't square with their narrative.
  • BoatShoes
    QuakerOats;1856899 wrote:Can't wait for the networks to quickly scramble to return to regularly scheduled programming when his statements don't square with their narrative.
    It will be ok. Everything will be comfortably reframed by talking heads in conservative media -
    the original safe space reserved for those suffering from perpetual victimhood at the hands of the elite liberal establishment.
  • sleeper
    BoatShoes;1856930 wrote:It will be ok. Everything will be comfortably reframed by talking heads in conservative media -
    the original safe space reserved for those suffering from perpetual victimhood at the hands of the elite liberal establishment.
    savage.
  • sleeper
    QuakerOats;1856899 wrote:Can't wait for the networks to quickly scramble to return to regularly scheduled programming when his statements don't square with their narrative.
    I didn't see C-Span go anywhere during the Benghazi and email hearings.
  • QuakerOats
    ABC, CBS, NBC would never touch that because it did not fit their liberal viewpoint. They are hoping with all their might that something Comey says will be twistable to their liking, thus they preempt regular programming .......absolutely hilarious.
  • gut
    I predict after Dems (and especially Wolf Blitzer) are disappointed, they will demand Comey be given immunity so he can tell "the whole truth" without fear of incrimination.

    This whole Russian collusion thing has, so far, been jumping from one disappointing lead/rumor to the next. They're running out of boogeymen. They are literally down to praying that Trump obstructed an investigation that has, to date, gone nowhere and produced nothing.
  • sleeper
    QuakerOats;1856982 wrote:ABC, CBS, NBC would never touch that because it did not fit their liberal viewpoint. They are hoping with all their might that something Comey says will be twistable to their liking, thus they preempt regular programming .......absolutely hilarious.
    ABC, CBS, and NBC are just chasing advertising dollars. It's a good sign that THE PEOPLE are interested in their government and Democracy, or what's left of it.
  • sleeper
    gut;1856994 wrote:I predict after Dems (and especially Wolf Blitzer) are disappointed, they will demand Comey be given immunity so he can tell "the whole truth" without fear of incrimination.

    This whole Russian collusion thing has, so far, been jumping from one disappointing lead/rumor to the next. They're running out of boogeymen. They are literally down to praying that Trump obstructed an investigation that has, to date, gone nowhere and produced nothing.
    Yeah especially since it's entirely about someone starting their job early which isn't a big deal and violates no laws.
  • gut
    sleeper;1856997 wrote:Yeah especially since it's entirely about someone starting their job early which isn't a big deal and violates no laws.
    No, I've said repeatedly it violated the Logan Act....and that, to my knowledge, no one has ever been prosecuted for doing so....and unlikely given that, in fact, a month later after he was confirmed this would not have been illegal.

    And you keep bringing this up, but no one is really talking about that Flynn conversation over sanctions, because it's basically a nothingburger.
  • fish82
    Just read an interesting Fun Fact:

    Trump's "historically low" approval ratings are actually about a half point higher than Bill Clinton's were at this same point in 1993.
  • jmog
    sleeper;1856996 wrote:ABC, CBS, and NBC are just chasing advertising dollars. It's a good sign that THE PEOPLE are interested in their government and Democracy, or what's left of it.
    Well, if that is your metric then "THE PEOPLE" are still more interested in your newly hated Fox News as the overall ratings through all of primetime nearly combines CNN and MSNBC to get to where FNC is.

    So, if THE PEOPLE have spoken by viewing and advertising dollars in your mind, then THE PEOPLE are still much more interested in conservative viewpoints, especially when you add in radio and 3 of the top 5 radio shows in the nation are conservative shows as well (Limbaugh, Ramsey, Hannity).


    http://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/scoreboard-monday-june-5/331581

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_most-listened-to_radio_programs#Popular_radio_shows_in_the_United_States


    Sorry sleeper, but you, once again, failed to see the whole picture.
  • sleeper
    jmog;1857094 wrote:Well, if that is your metric then "THE PEOPLE" are still more interested in your newly hated Fox News as the overall ratings through all of primetime nearly combines CNN and MSNBC to get to where FNC is.

    So, if THE PEOPLE have spoken by viewing and advertising dollars in your mind, then THE PEOPLE are still much more interested in conservative viewpoints, especially when you add in radio and 3 of the top 5 radio shows in the nation are conservative shows as well (Limbaugh, Ramsey, Hannity).


    http://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/scoreboard-monday-june-5/331581

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_most-listened-to_radio_programs#Popular_radio_shows_in_the_United_States


    Sorry sleeper, but you, once again, failed to see the whole picture.
    Fox News has more viewers because they focus on what their audience wants to hear rather than informing the public. This creates a positive feedback loop of viewership and because the news so radically different than reality, reality becomes Fake News.

    Sorry you bought into it.
  • QuakerOats
    gut;1856994 wrote:This whole Russian collusion thing has, so far, been jumping from one disappointing lead/rumor to the next. They're running out of boogeymen. They are literally down to praying that Trump obstructed an investigation that has, to date, gone nowhere and produced nothing.

    And obviously Trump did not ..........otherwise Comey would be in line for jail time for failing to report a felony, and/or he would have/should have resigned.



    But hey, Russianoia is real.
  • rocketalum
    Here's my hot take. There's no collusion to win the election. There was/is planning to use the position of President to advance business interests of Trump Inc. Maybe that's with Russian money. I do have a hard time dismissing all the contact between Trump associates and Russian agents/affiliates (what' the list now Manafort, Page, Flynn, Sessions, Kushner etc..) I just don't think it was for the purpose of "rigging" the election. They're friendly, and that's weird, and maybe there's something there but I'm just not sold that it's collusion to fix an election. That's lefty fantasy IMO.

    What I think is very real is the old "coverup worse than the crime" adage. If Trump did pressure or even ask (as POTUS his requests carry some pretty significant weight) Comey to "lay off Flynn" or fired him "because of this Russia thing" that's pretty damn close to obstruction. That's the issue now to me. Trump may even be right to be frustrated by what amounts to a frivolous investigation but it's an investigation non the less and trying to meddle in it or influence it as POTUS should be viewed very seriously. The merit of the investigation is moot, obstruction is obstruction and the man is often his own worst enemy. Just shut your mouth and this eventually all goes away.