Senate Bill 5 Targets Collective Bargaining for Elimination!
-
bonelizzarddwccrew;682631 wrote:Thanks for those numbers and e-mails again. I e-mailed every single one of those politicians and told them I am in support of SB5. Thank you.
SB5 is wrong. Call or email the following Senators and tell them so..
Kevin Bacon - Chair - 466-8064 [email protected]
Keith Faber - Vice-Chair - 466-7584 [email protected]
Joe Schiavoni (Currently AGAINST the Bill - THANK HIM) [email protected]
Bill Beagle - 466-6247 - [email protected]
Edna Brown (Currently AGAINST the Bill - THANK HER) [email protected]
Jim Hughes - 466-5981 [email protected]
Shannon Jones (the Bills Author - Tell her she's wrong) 466-9737 [email protected]
Kris Jordan - 466-8086 - [email protected]
Eric Kearney (Currently AGAINST the Bill - THANK HIM) - [email protected]
Tom Sawyer (Currently AGAINST the Bill - THANK HIM) - [email protected]
Tim Schaffer - 466-5838 - [email protected]
Bill Seitz - 466-8068 - [email protected]
good for you dw. Phone calls work better. More effective. more personal. Feel free to copy my post and edit it however you want, like you did before. Should have been at the State House yesterday in real support but that would have actually taken some effort and you would have had to get out into the real world. SB5 opponents far outnumbered SB5 supporters. -
CenterBHSFan
I would imagine that it might depend on who does the pollingbonelizzard;682675 wrote:good for you dw. Phone calls work better. More effective. more personal. Feel free to copy my post and edit it however you want, like you did before. Should have been at the State House yesterday in real support but that would have actually taken some effort and you would have had to get out into the real world. SB5 opponents far outnumbered SB5 supporters. -
analogkidO-Trap
I think that you and I are basically on the same page here. I was not trying to imply that teachers are the best and the brightest. Nor was I trying to imply that having an alphabet soup after your name makes you a good teacher. I was trying to say that plenty of highly competent individuals make teaching their career of choice. Many current teachers had successful careers elsewhere prior to coming to education. That being said, their are also a fair number of poor teachers and the current system does not do enough to rectify that situation.
Crew
Maybe I am just too sensitive about that particular quote but to me it goes far beyond intelligence. To me it implies that teaching is an inferior profession and that pretty much anybody could do if they wanted. Somewhere in the vicinity of 50% of new teachers quit within 5 years. So are they the can'ts of the can't crowd? Do they go back to the 'real' world and they are in the can crowd? Its just a ridiculous statement that I think colors peoples view of the profession. If you want to be a good teacher, you work hard and you are talented. If you want to be successful in the business world, you work hard and you are talented. Successful private sector folks can be successful teachers, or they could fail. Successful teachers can be successful in the private sector, or they can fail. Teaching should be a desired and respected profession. Unfortunately our current education system does many things that only serve to reinforce this stereotype. I think that merit pay and eliminating continuing contracts would go some of the distance to fixing that situation. -
Fab4Runner
The majority of the supporters were probably at work. I know I was.bonelizzard;682675 wrote:SB5 is wrong. Call or email the following Senators and tell them so..
Kevin Bacon - Chair - 466-8064 [email protected]
Keith Faber - Vice-Chair - 466-7584 [email protected]
Joe Schiavoni (Currently AGAINST the Bill - THANK HIM) [email protected]
Bill Beagle - 466-6247 - [email protected]
Edna Brown (Currently AGAINST the Bill - THANK HER) [email protected]
Jim Hughes - 466-5981 [email protected]
Shannon Jones (the Bills Author - Tell her she's wrong) 466-9737 [email protected]
Kris Jordan - 466-8086 - [email protected]
Eric Kearney (Currently AGAINST the Bill - THANK HIM) - [email protected]
Tom Sawyer (Currently AGAINST the Bill - THANK HIM) - [email protected]
Tim Schaffer - 466-5838 - [email protected]
Bill Seitz - 466-8068 - [email protected]
good for you dw. Phone calls work better. More effective. more personal. Feel free to copy my post and edit it however you want, like you did before. Should have been at the State House yesterday in real support but that would have actually taken some effort and you would have had to get out into the real world. SB5 opponents far outnumbered SB5 supporters. -
jmogtiger1990;682192 wrote:I take work home too & work right beside her. Thing is, I knew what I was getting into when I chose to get my degree, as did she (& you guys too). This is what we signed up for - why tear down another profession to make things "equal"...?
Who's tearing them down? If you work in the private sector then you agree that your wife's benefits are probably far better than your's, why should that be the case? Why shouldn't her benefits be more inline with her level of education instead? -
O-Trap
Actually, if your job is at all stressful, phone calls are annoying, because it occupies more of your faculties, and you can't engage it on your own time.bonelizzard;682675 wrote:Phone calls work better. More effective. more personal.
Yeah, taking time off work anytime you want to protest a bill ... THAT'S the real world, alright.bonelizzard;682675 wrote:Should have been at the State House yesterday in real support but that would have actually taken some effort and you would have had to get out into the real world.
No, dwcrew was probably at work, earning whatever pay he can earn, which has likely already been affected by the economy, so he understads why it is so important to be at work doing what he should be doing ... and doing it to the best of his ability.
The supporters were probably at their jobs, working hard.bonelizzard;682675 wrote:SB5 opponents far outnumbered SB5 supporters.
I didn't think you were saying either of those things. Don't worry.analogkid;682681 wrote:O-Trap
I think that you and I are basically on the same page here. I was not trying to imply that teachers are the best and the brightest. Nor was I trying to imply that having an alphabet soup after your name makes you a good teacher. I was trying to say that plenty of highly competent individuals make teaching their career of choice. Many current teachers had successful careers elsewhere prior to coming to education. That being said, their are also a fair number of poor teachers and the current system does not do enough to rectify that situation.
And I agree with your sentiments.
As was I. Taking a day off work to go and lobby about your paycheck ... anyone else see the irony?Fab4Runner;682682 wrote:The majority of the supporters were probably at work. I know I was. -
jmogbonelizzard;682554 wrote:SB5 is wrong. Call or email the following Senators and tell them so..
Kevin Bacon - Chair - 466-8064 [email protected]
Keith Faber - Vice-Chair - 466-7584 [email protected]
Joe Schiavoni (Currently AGAINST the Bill - THANK HIM) [email protected]
Bill Beagle - 466-6247 - [email protected]
Edna Brown (Currently AGAINST the Bill - THANK HER) [email protected]
Jim Hughes - 466-5981 [email protected]
Shannon Jones (the Bills Author - Tell her she's wrong) 466-9737 [email protected]
Kris Jordan - 466-8086 - [email protected]
Eric Kearney (Currently AGAINST the Bill - THANK HIM) - [email protected]
Tom Sawyer (Currently AGAINST the Bill - THANK HIM) - [email protected]
Tim Schaffer - 466-5838 - [email protected]
Bill Seitz - 466-8068 - [email protected]
Thanks for giving me all those email addresses so I can mass email them my support of this bill. -
tsst_fballfanI've got the solution!!! Let's give every school a printing press for $100 bills. Let them print all the money they need like the fedgov does. Give every teacher a $250,000 salary, lifetime FREE healthcare, and a $1 million pension. Hell while we're at it lets just get the fed to print about $900 trillion more and give every American a few million dollars. Liberal Utopianism, got love it!
Kidding aside. Nobody wants to tear down teachers. And nobody wants kids education to decline. And nobody wants to endanger first responders. That's simply BS union scare speak. It is a simple math problem folks. If the revenue isn't there then the expenses HAVE to be cut.
If your income was $100,000 and you spent $100,000 and now your income is $50,000 you cannot continue to spend $100,000 like nothing has changed. Why is that so damn hard for educated folks to understand?!?! THE MONEY ISN'T THERE!
Should we turn off heat and electricity in the schools so we can pay all the healthcare, pensions and salaries of the staff? Maybe we can auction off the school books and desks to give raises? -
jmogbonelizzard;682675 wrote:
SB5 opponents far outnumbered SB5 supporters.
That's because those of us that support it were out actually working to pay the salaries of those who support it! -
fish82
Already done. Thanks lizzard!jmog;682715 wrote:Thanks for giving me all those email addresses so I can mass email them my support of this bill. -
fish82
My hand's up.O-Trap;682714 wrote:Taking a day off work to go and lobby about your paycheck ... anyone else see the irony? -
Skyhook79Romans 13:1-6 comes to mind. Nothing wrong with peaceful protests and voicing your opinion, but if it turns into whats going on in the MidEast, look out.
-
QuakerOatsFab4Runner;682682 wrote:The majority of the supporters were probably at work. I know I was.
Same here, but due to the high efficiency and work ethic associated with the private sector, I was able multi-task and send emails to all the above officials while simultaneously maintaining a high-level of work, which will hopefully keep me in line for a Wall St sized bonus. -
O-TrapQuakerOats;682834 wrote:Same here, but due to the high efficiency and work ethic associated with the private sector, I was able multi-task and send emails to all the above officials while simultaneously maintaining a high-level of work, which will hopefully keep me in line for a Wall St sized bonus.
Wall Street-sized? Good for you! -
bonelizzardYou guys must not have been working too hard while I was practicing my constitutional privilege of free speech at the State House. You found time to get some more posts here on the very popular politics forum of the Ohio Chatter.. lol.. Getting those posts counts high... lol.. Come on guys get out from behind your computer screens and hiding.. lol
-
FatHobbitbonelizzard;682840 wrote:You guys must not have been working too hard while I was practicing my constitutional privilege of free speech at the State House. You found time to get some more posts here on the very popular politics forum of the Ohio Chatter.. lol.. Getting those posts counts high... lol.. Come on guys get out from behind your computer screens and hiding.. lol
lol -
O-Trapbonelizzard;682840 wrote:You guys must not have been working too hard while I was practicing my constitutional privilege of free speech at the State House. You found time to get some more posts here on the very popular politics forum of the Ohio Chatter.. lol.. Getting those posts counts high... lol.. Come on guys get out from behind your computer screens and hiding.. lol
The beauty is, I get a TON done every day. I keep the forum open, and when I get a spare 90 seconds or so, I type on here. It's called "maximizing your time."
I commend you for practicing your Constitutional rights. I do. I disagree with your stance on this issue vehemently, but I can appreciate your desire to exercise your rights. I still find it odd that you took off work to do it when the issue surrounds your benefits ... which you get in exchange for working (in theory).
As for the "behind the computer" comment, I don't hide who I am on here. Hell, there are PLENTY of people here who know who I am. Why do I interact mostly with people via computer? Simple. My day job requires me to be behind one for 8+ hours, and my side job is completely Internet-based.
Sounds like a lot of work, right? It is, but I'm earning what I make.
(This post was written while waiting for a report to load.) -
bonelizzard
good for you... +1 on in the post column.. lol cha ching...O-Trap;682858 wrote:The beauty is, I get a TON done every day. I keep the forum open, and when I get a spare 90 seconds or so, I type on here. It's called "maximizing your time."
I commend you for practicing your Constitutional rights. I do. I disagree with your stance on this issue vehemently, but I can appreciate your desire to exercise your rights. I still find it odd that you took off work to do it when the issue surrounds your benefits ... which you get in exchange for working (in theory).
As for the "behind the computer" comment, I don't hide who I am on here. Hell, there are PLENTY of people here who know who I am. Why do I interact mostly with people via computer? Simple. My day job requires me to be behind one for 8+ hours, and my side job is completely Internet-based.
Sounds like a lot of work, right? It is, but I'm earning what I make.
(This post was written while waiting for a report to load.) -
O-Trapbonelizzard;682863 wrote:good for you... +1 on in the post column.. lol cha ching...
Huh?
I don't care about posts. They can take my posts to zero and leave them there for all I care. Feel free to direct Justin to this post, as well, if you don't believe me.
I post here more or less often depending on the topic. If I'm interested in it, I post. If not, I don't.
Not sure why that matters, but hey. -
QuakerOatsThey should have a banner day today in Columbus since a lot of them are off again today so as to make it a 4-day weekend, given that Monday is another teacher holiday. Amazing how that works. Of course, the suffering of the final work product is secondary.
-
bonelizzardO-Trap;682864 wrote:Huh?
I don't care about posts. They can take my posts to zero and leave them there for all I care. Feel free to direct Justin to this post, as well, if you don't believe me.
I post here more or less often depending on the topic. If I'm interested in it, I post. If not, I don't.
Not sure why that matters, but hey.
uh huh.. I believe you. +1 -
Fab4Runner
I am not sure how post count is relevant to this thread at all...but okay. We're all here to do the same thing you are doing: voice our opinions and engage in conversation and debate. Just because someone has a different view than you doesn't mean they are here to pad their posts. That literally makes zero sense.bonelizzard;682863 wrote:good for you... +1 on in the post column.. lol cha ching...
Believe it or not you can actually learn a lot from reading through the various threads in this forum. I know a few teachers but do not speak to any on a daily basis. Hearing from ernest, gblock, etc is giving me a chance to hear their side of things. Just because I haven't changed my opinion doesn't mean I haven't been taking the information to heart. -
WriterbuckeyeI see being a teacher hasn't stopped a lot of folks from posting on here quite a bit, either.
Do they still have nap time? I loved nap time. -
bonelizzard
sure we have nap time for your kids at school.. lol.. because the parents can't get the kids to bed on time the night before.. haWriterbuckeye;682884 wrote:I see being a teacher hasn't stopped a lot of folks from posting on here quite a bit, either.
Do they still have nap time? I loved nap time.
whatever it takes to raise your kids.. we're all one big happy family. -
CinciX12I think because Ernest was the one that brought it up from a teacher's perspective, everyone is ignoring the ramifications it will have for the rest of state employees. Teachers only make up half of who this bill will affect. It will also affect the people you need someday like cops, firefighters, ems, and employees in the emergency rooms you are being brought to in some cities.