Uranium One / Clinton Foundation / obama DoJ corruption

Home Forums Politics

QuakerOats

Senior Member

Thu, Sep 20, 2018 11:07 AM

 

 

 

The person gave the testimony admitting it. 

 

The text messages speak for themselves.

 

What more do you need?

Spock

Senior Member

Mon, Sep 24, 2018 11:05 AM

LOL, Rod Rosenstein is going to the WH right now......likely being fired.  Whats the chances that they strip search him for a wire?

Dr Winston O'Boogie

Senior Member

Tue, Oct 9, 2018 9:21 AM
posted by Spock

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/bill-hillary-clinton-to-embark-on-speaking-tour-amid-metoo-backlash-with-tickets-topping-745

 

Why wouldnt someone tell them that they should just disappear

I think they are both literally so addicted to attention and adulation that they cannot stop themselves.  There is not "go quietly off into the good night" for these two.  Their egos won't allow that.  

 

At least Bill is an interesting guy to listen to.  I can't imagine who wants to hear more of Hillary's blather.  It reminds me of some of these musical stars who have a "farewell" tour and then have another one in five years.  These two will still be on speaking tours when they are brought out in wheelchairs, nightgowns, with no teeth, wearing diapers, and slobbering when they speak.  

CenterBHSFan

333 - I'm only half evil

Tue, Oct 9, 2018 9:37 AM
posted by Dr Winston O'Boogie

I think they are both literally so addicted to attention and adulation that they cannot stop themselves.  There is not "go quietly off into the good night" for these two.  Their egos won't allow that.  

 

At least Bill is an interesting guy to listen to.  I can't imagine who wants to hear more of Hillary's blather.  It reminds me of some of these musical stars who have a "farewell" tour and then have another one in five years.  These two will still be on speaking tours when they are brought out in wheelchairs, nightgowns, with no teeth, wearing diapers, and slobbering when they speak.  

Even at this, I just cannot imagine spending $700 to hear anybody give a speech. I wouldn't spend that if I got to listen to five of my all-time favorite bands/singers put on an all day show lol! Especially when you know that somebody, somewhere will sneak footage and put it up on youtube or something.

Dr Winston O'Boogie

Senior Member

Tue, Oct 9, 2018 3:52 PM
posted by CenterBHSFan

Even at this, I just cannot imagine spending $700 to hear anybody give a speech. I wouldn't spend that if I got to listen to five of my all-time favorite bands/singers put on an all day show lol! Especially when you know that somebody, somewhere will sneak footage and put it up on youtube or something.

I wouldn't spend $.07 to see these two.  We've been hearing from them for almost 30 years - there's nothing left to say.  

QuakerOats

Senior Member

Mon, Oct 15, 2018 3:39 PM

 

  • Senate staffer who dated NY Times reporter pleads guilty to lying to FBI about leaks

    A former security director for the Senate Intelligence Committee has pleaded guilty to one count of giving a false statement to FBI agents looking into leaks to several reporters, the Justice Department confirmed to Fox News on Monday. James A. Wolfe, 58, previously had a three-year romantic relationship with New York Times reporter Ali Watkins.

 

 

DRAIN THE SWAMP

QuakerOats

Senior Member

Fri, Oct 19, 2018 12:05 PM

 

SENIOR Treasury official arrested with stolen flash drive full of highly confidential information about Trump officials that she has leaked to media. And her boss (obviously even more ‘senior’) also implicated. 


State Dept officials caught lying to Judge Lamberth regarding serious matters related to the Russia witch hunt. 

 

Glenn Simpson takes the 5th.

 

Nellie Ohr testifying today. 

 

 

The cover up of the largest criminal scandal in politics rolls on.

gut

Senior Member

Fri, Oct 19, 2018 12:48 PM
posted by QuakerOats

SENIOR Treasury official arrested with stolen flash drive full of highly confidential information about Trump officials that she has leaked to media. And her boss (obviously even more ‘senior’) also implicated. 

So that brings up an interesting question....if a reporter receives classified/illegal information that does NOT qualify under whistleblower laws, should the reporter be obligated to report that as a crime?  I guess there would have to be some standard of "knowingly obvious" in order not to burden reporters with judging what qualifies or not.

 

CenterBHSFan

333 - I'm only half evil

Mon, Oct 22, 2018 12:42 PM
posted by QuakerOats

 

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-10-20/fbi-admits-using-multiple-spies-infiltrate-trump-campaign

 

More FBI admissions … the coup that failed  -- staggering

I don't find it staggering at all. I kinda find it funny that they hated him so much to go through all the trouble. Presidency's are temporary, these people would have been better served to just bide their time. Sure, bitch, moan, complain and have all the meltdowns that you want, nothing to say that you can't. But to spend the time and money of government resources in this way (which, so far, for nothing) is laughable.

QuakerOats

Senior Member

Mon, Oct 22, 2018 1:44 PM

 

 

I want to know why they did it.  Are they that beholden to the Clinton Crime Family that they ‘had to’?

ptown_trojans_1

Moderator

Mon, Oct 22, 2018 2:09 PM
posted by QuakerOats

 

 

I want to know why they did it.  Are they that beholden to the Clinton Crime Family that they ‘had to’?

LOL. 

I love this thread. 

At this point, I'm shocked we haven't seen you post a theory that the Clintons were behind 9/11. 

ptown_trojans_1

Moderator

Mon, Oct 22, 2018 2:13 PM
posted by gut

So that brings up an interesting question....if a reporter receives classified/illegal information that does NOT qualify under whistleblower laws, should the reporter be obligated to report that as a crime?  I guess there would have to be some standard of "knowingly obvious" in order not to burden reporters with judging what qualifies or not.

 

No. See the NYT v. US during the Pentagon Papers publication. 

Also, it has been shown throughout other court cases that the press can protect and does not have to name sources. 

QuakerOats

Senior Member

Mon, Oct 22, 2018 3:10 PM
posted by ptown_trojans_1

LOL. 

I love this thread. 

At this point, I'm shocked we haven't seen you post a theory that the Clintons were behind 9/11. 

 

If it meant donations, nothing would surprise.

 

Sad you wish that the swamp remain filled.

 

ptown_trojans_1

Moderator

Mon, Oct 22, 2018 3:53 PM
posted by QuakerOats

 

If it meant donations, nothing would surprise.

 

Sad you wish that the swamp remain filled.

 

LOL. Just say it. Clinton did 9/11. 

CenterBHSFan

333 - I'm only half evil

Mon, Oct 22, 2018 4:22 PM
posted by ptown_trojans_1

LOL. Just say it. Clinton did 9/11. 

Nawww... Obama is the one with domestic terrorist ties! ;)

ptown_trojans_1

Moderator

Mon, Oct 22, 2018 6:19 PM
posted by CenterBHSFan

Nawww... Obama is the one with domestic terrorist ties! ;)

No, no. You have it wrong. Obama is the socialist/ marxist that wanted to take down this country and the Clinton's are the murderers. 

Spock

Senior Member

Mon, Oct 22, 2018 6:22 PM

Terrible that if You follow the money trail....nobody behind this ever go to jail

Dr Winston O'Boogie

Senior Member

Mon, Oct 22, 2018 9:49 PM
posted by QuakerOats

 

If it meant donations, nothing would surprise.

 

Sad you wish that the swamp remain filled.

 

Hillary created Hurricane Michael to wipe out a decidedly pro Trump area. I’d give her a C+. Impressive hurricane power but way too small a diameter. Maybe next time. 

 

“Drain the swamp”. What are some other Trump phrases you’ve adopted in the last two years and now use?  

QuakerOats

Senior Member

Tue, Oct 23, 2018 10:33 AM
posted by ptown_trojans_1

LOL. Just say it. Clinton did 9/11. 

 

Maybe you can comment on the fact that the FBI has admitted to infiltrating and spying on a duly elected president of the United States.  Is there any higher crime that our government could commit against The People?

 

Dr Winston O'Boogie

Senior Member

Tue, Oct 23, 2018 5:32 PM
posted by QuakerOats

 

Maybe you can comment on the fact that the FBI has admitted to infiltrating and spying on a duly elected president of the United States.  Is there any higher crime that our government could commit against The People?

 

The FBI has not admitted to "spying on a duly elected president".  The FBI was conducting counterintelligence to determine if a foreign government was meddling with an American presidential campaign.  This is the bureau's job.  Any reasonable campaign would understand the stakes of another country's meddling and see this counterintelligence as beneficial.  The reason you say the FBI spied on "a duly elected president" is because Trump said it.  In case you haven't noticed, whenever Trump doesn't like something, he makes up any shit he wants to discredit the person or institution.  All you're doing is parroting the party line.  

QuakerOats

Senior Member

Wed, Oct 24, 2018 11:31 AM

 

The FBI set up Trump officials for the purpose of spying.  Not sure how to spell it out for you any easier.