Ohio Chatter DEV

BR1986FB

like_that;1870180 wrote:I think Pat Mchamahon (dgaf about spelling), the ESPN Browns correspond is creeping up as the worst.

He was actually pretty good when he was with the Akron Beacon Journal but like most (see Windhorst), when they join ESPN they turn to shit.

Laley23

ESPN gives all their beat reporters WAY to much to handle. Constantly writing articles, going on TV, making radio appearances nationally etc. If they just let them to their job reporting...youd probably see much better and accurate coverage.

like_that

Laley23;1870282 wrote:ESPN gives all their beat reporters WAY to much to handle. Constantly writing articles, going on TV, making radio appearances nationally etc. If they just let them to their job reporting...youd probably see much better and accurate coverage.

That makes sense to me, but doesn't explain why Grossi is so terrible.

Commander of Awesome

SMFH, of course.

"Cleveland Browns DE Myles Garrett injures ankle, status for opener unknown"

vball10set

Commander of Awesome;1870323 wrote:SMFH, of course.

"Cleveland Browns DE Myles Garrett injures ankle, status for opener unknown"

lol...of course!

Commander of Awesome

vball10set;1870325 wrote:lol...of course!

This is literally what two of my buddies have said in response.

SportsAndLady

Have a good feeling about this game for some reason. Calling it first, Browns by 6!

like_that

SportsAndLady;1870336 wrote:Have a good feeling about this game for some reason. Calling it first, Browns by 6!

Did you give thavoice your password?

Commander of Awesome

like_that;1870338 wrote:Did you give thavoice your password?

I feel like he does this every season.

SportsAndLady

Commander of Awesome;1870339 wrote:I feel like he does this every season.

That was deydurkie lol

I am always very pessimistic going into the Browns season. This year is different. Still think 6 wins, max. But I think it'll be an enjoyable season to watch.

BR1986FB

SportsAndLady;1870343 wrote:That was deydurkie lol

I am always very pessimistic going into the Browns season. This year is different. Still think 6 wins, max. But I think it'll be an enjoyable season to watch.

For the first time, in a long time, I think they'll be pretty fun to watch with all of the young guys. It looks like they could be getting better at hitting on picks.

As far as this game goes (hoping Garrett plays), I keep having this recurring vision that Garrett ends TheRapist's career.

kizer permanente

SportsAndLady;1868864 wrote:Plus all you're doing kizer is mentioning bad teams on the schedule. You're forgetting the browns are worse than them. Upsets happen sure, but just because the game is "winnable" doesn't mean we are going to win. We're going to be pretty bad, even games that we can win, we'll be 4 point underdogs going into it.

4 wins, MAX.

SportsAndLady;1870343 wrote:That was deydurkie lol

I am always very pessimistic going into the Browns season. This year is different. Still think 6 wins, max. But I think it'll be an enjoyable season to watch.

:RpS_glare:

SportsAndLady

Said that before I watched preseason games. I think they could win 6 games based on the defense being a lot better. But that's best case scenario. They're not going to be a good team, but I think they'll definitely be more fun to watch.

kizer permanente

The only game that hadn't taken place was the 4th game where no one played lol

SportsAndLady

Re-read. I hadn't watched all of the games. Recently watched. I needed to wait for games to be on NFL network since I don't have the games live here in Chicago. Only game I saw live was the first half of the MNF game then I had a fantasy draft.

kizer permanente

Ah ok. So that means you argued with me about how good the Browns are without watching them play. So you're that guy. Good to know.

SportsAndLady

kizer permanente;1870359 wrote:Ah ok. So that means you argued with me about how good the Browns are without watching them play. So you're that guy. Good to know.

Uh no dumbass. I argued with you because you said the browns have 11 winnable games.

kizer permanente

I also said they would have 6-7 wins which apparently you agree with now you've watched them play. Don't worry. It'll come to you. Just keep watching.

SportsAndLady

You think by saying 6 games max I'm saying they're going to win 6 games? How old are you?

kizer permanente

SportsAndLady;1870362 wrote:You think by saying 6 games max I'm saying they're going to win 6 games? How old are you?

I think by saying 6 games max is saying you think they can win 6 games too, yes.

kizer permanente

kizer permanente;1868846 wrote:Oh definitely. This kid still has a lot to work on. He's not going to win 10-11 games this year. How fast he progresses though, 6-7 isn't out of the question. 3-4 isn't either though. Training camp tends to show he makes strides quickly. Either way they'll be a lot more enjoyable to watch this year. Just by having a QB who CAN move the offense.

that was the quote earlier in the thread you took issue with and said 4 games max by the way incase you have a bad memory. So yeah. You're essentially agreeing with me now.

SportsAndLady

kizer permanente;1870364 wrote:that was the quote earlier in the thread you took issue with and said 4 games max by the way incase you have a bad memory. So yeah. You're essentially agreeing with me now.

Trying to defend your dumbass comments?

Again, my issue was with saying 11 winnable games, not anything else.

I'm done speaking with you though. You're a dumbass and more than likely thavoice.

like_that

Kizer is still butthurt, because of his 11 winnable games comment? LOL

kizer permanente

Yes I'm butthurt because the least knowledgeable football fan on here disagrees with me lol. And you're in his camp here like_that. Good company :RpS_blink:

SportsAndLady

Anyway, ignoring the dumbass...

http://www.cleveland.com/browns/index.ssf/2017/09/myles_garretts_ankle_injury_co.html

That fucking sucks.

Archive

2017 Browns Off-Season Thread