Archive

ISIS

  • steubbigred
    thavoice;1704422 wrote:Yeah..no shit.
    SHe very well may be dead, but I highly doubt it was the result of those Jordanian airstrikes.......They are just trying to make a divide.

    To be honest....even if those Jordanian strikes did kill her, it shouldnt hinder our resolve to eradicate them from the earth. SHit happens in war, sometimes you kill the good guys, and even if she was killed in airstrike it wont make me go against Jordan being involved in this fight.
    you want to know the ugly truth . the ugly truth is these filthy cocksuckers have her as a slave.. we must completely destroy raqqa. wipe it off the face of the earth we will kill all those devils and put the people in slavery and being tortured out of their misery...
  • thavoice
    steubbigred;1704498 wrote:you want to know the ugly truth . the ugly truth is these filthy cocksuckers have her as a slave.. we must completely destroy raqqa. wipe it off the face of the earth we will kill all those devils and put the people in slavery and being tortured out of their misery...
    Well that was understood. She was either killed already by them or still alive. Either way, she was a slave to them.
  • jmog
    For those that believe the "well Christians did bad things 1000 years ago..."



    I don't necessarily agree with the broad statement about Islam on the left, but the Muslim/Moor invasions described on the list on the right that lead up to the Crusades are 100% accurate.
  • steubbigred
    thavoice;1704502 wrote:Well that was understood. She was either killed already by them or still alive. Either way, she was a slave to them.
    yes and it sickens me to no end that a passive person with nothing but good will in her heart could be taken by these animals . this is one time i wish we had one of the bush's or reagan in office and i vote democratic. i would rather be killed by american or jordan bombs than be held slave to these devils they are torturous barbarians and they need liquidated. any son of a bitch who wants to join them needs locked up and thrown in a dungeon.
  • steubbigred
    jmog;1704512 wrote:For those that believe the "well Christians did bad things 1000 years ago..."



    I don't necessarily agree with the broad statement about Islam on the left, but the Muslim/Moor invasions described on the list on the right that lead up to the Crusades are 100% accurate.
    i wish somebody would stand on a high horse and speak for the free thinking world and lead us into battle against these devils. it isn't our man
  • steubbigred
    /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
  • TedSheckler
    This again.

  • steubbigred
    TedSheckler;1705788 wrote:This again.

    do this per hour...........how are we going to eliminate so many of these cocksuckers.....
  • Tiernan
    60 Minutes tonight segment on jihadist recruitment in France (which is happening in Detroit even more so...) highlights how civilized societies have to start eradicating (yes genocide) of Muslims worldwide. Everyone says that no leadership will ever promote or campaign for such action. I say BS now...I believe a majority of smart people in the US would support a plan to eliminate Islam from the planet.
  • Wolves of Babylon
    Tiernan;1705800 wrote:60 Minutes tonight segment on jihadist recruitment in France (which is happening in Detroit even more so...) highlights how civilized societies have to start eradicating (yes genocide) of Muslims worldwide. Everyone says that no leadership will ever promote or campaign for such action. I say BS now...I believe a majority of smart people in the US would support a plan to eliminate Islam from the planet.
    A majority support mass murder, even of innocent people? If this is true then we deserve to be wiped off the planet.
  • Tiernan
    That is the intent of Islam to wipe out everyone else...so Yes it's a lets get them before they get us thing. Unfortunately it has come to this but it's the only answer.
  • TedSheckler
    JV team on the defensive captures Iraqi town and burns alive 45 people.

    http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-31502863


  • Gardens35
    Two well placed EXPLOSIONS would probably decimate the ISIS......the first in Syria, 25 miles or so south of the border with Turkey.....the second in North-Central Iraq, maybe 3 days later.
  • Rotinaj
    Gardens35;1706123 wrote:Two well placed EXPLOSIONS would probably decimate the ISIS......the first in Syria, 25 miles or so south of the border with Turkey.....the second in North-Central Iraq, maybe 3 days later.
    Probably not.
  • QuakerOats
    Conservatives: peace through strength.

    Liberals: appeasement, then defeat.
  • Dr Winston O'Boogie
    QuakerOats;1706129 wrote:Conservatives: peace through strength.

    Liberals: appeasement, then defeat.
    Wrong. Our enemy is ISIS, not fellow Americans who happen to disagree with us politically. We're all Americans after all and these religious fanatics are our common antithesis.
  • ptown_trojans_1
    QuakerOats;1706129 wrote:Conservatives: peace through strength.

    Liberals: appeasement, then defeat.
    Examples of this please?
    Catchy, but not accurate. Conflates a lot of things.
  • Heretic
    QuakerOats;1706129 wrote:Conservatives: peace through strength.

    Liberals: appeasement, then defeat.
    QQuakerOats: Moronic slogans that mean nothing.
  • Cleveland Buck
    In reality it's more like:

    Conservatives: Economic weakness through perpetual war.
    Liberals: Economic weakness through perpetual war.
  • wkfan
    Heretic;1706159 wrote:QQuakerOats: Moronic slogans that mean nothing.
    Sorta like 'Hope and Change'?
  • Heretic
    wkfan;1706166 wrote:Sorta like 'Hope and Change'?
    Pretty much. About any political slogan, whether it be from a politician's PR campaign or a politard's shit-filled excuse for a brain, tends to be meaningless tripe. Kind of like corporate buzzwords, but on a bigger scale.
  • QuakerOats
    ptown_trojans_1;1706147 wrote:Examples of this please?
    Catchy, but not accurate. Conflates a lot of things.
    Ronald Reagan: fall of USSR

    barack obama: rise of terrorism
  • QuakerOats
    Dr Winston O'Boogie;1706134 wrote:Our enemy is ISIS, not fellow Americans who happen to disagree with us politically. We're all Americans after all and these religious fanatics are our common antithesis.
    We agree; I did not say that liberals were the enemy (although in an indirect way I suppose a case could be made for such). My point was to contrast the foundations from which we base our strategy upon.
  • ptown_trojans_1
    QuakerOats;1706177 wrote:Ronald Reagan: fall of USSR

    barack obama: rise of terrorism
    The fall of the USSR goes all the way back to George Kennan and the policy of containment and NSC-68.
    Reagan did a nice push, but he also really nearly killed us all in the period of 1981-1983.
    Also, it was Carter, during the FY1980 Defense budget start started the push on defense.

    And, the rise of terrorism for Obama? Huh? What the hell does that mean? That makes no logical sense when you look at the rise and fall of terrorism as a whole.
    Also, OBL dead, and the rise of drone strikes to take out terrorism leaders does not line up to your rhetoric.
    Typical Quaker.
  • Dr Winston O'Boogie
    QuakerOats;1706177 wrote:Ronald Reagan: fall of USSR

    barack obama: rise of terrorism
    The USSR would have fallen with or without Reagan. It was a failed state destined for destruction.

    Terrorism has been around for thousands of years and will be around for thousands more. Militant Islamic terrorism has been around all through the twentieth and twenty first centuries (including the 1983 Beirut barracks bombing during the Reagan administration). Your way oversimplifying things.