Sugar Bowl: #13 Michigan def. #11 Virginia Tech, 23-20 (OT)

• dwccrew

  

  WebFire;1015270 wrote:He wasn't comparing. He was saying it would be a good marketing matchup, which it would. No one said DR was better, but you felt the need to say the obvious. A clear shot. Don't be so sensitive, you guys lost.

  Why would it be a good marketing match-up when one player is MUCH better than the other? The only way it would be a good marketing match-up is if they were on the same level, which they clearly are not.
  
  LOL, yeah I'm being sensitive because OSU lost even though I picked Michigan to win that game. LOL, good luck in your bowl game, not that you'll need it against VA Tech.
  
  Maybe Michigan will get their 2nd ever BCS win and first bowl win since Jan 1, 2008. 2-6 in the last decade in bowls, gotta improve that record.
  
  http://bentley.umich.edu/athdept/football/bowls/
  
  Now there's a shot for ya.
• WebFire

  dwccrew;1016335 wrote:Why would it be a good marketing match-up when one player is MUCH better than the other? The only way it would be a good marketing match-up is if they were on the same level, which they clearly are not.
  
  LOL, yeah I'm being sensitive because OSU lost even though I picked Michigan to win that game. LOL, good luck in your bowl game, not that you'll need it against VA Tech.
  
  Maybe Michigan will get their 2nd ever BCS win and first bowl win since Jan 1, 2008. 2-6 in the last decade in bowls, gotta improve that record.
  
  http://bentley.umich.edu/athdept/football/bowls/
  
  Now there's a shot for ya.

  I see, so there has to be 2 Heisman winners in the same bowl to be marketable. What a dumb fucking post.
• WebFire

  dwccrew;1016335 wrote:Why would it be a good marketing match-up when one player is MUCH better than the other? The only way it would be a good marketing match-up is if they were on the same level, which they clearly are not.
  
  LOL, yeah I'm being sensitive because OSU lost even though I picked Michigan to win that game. LOL, good luck in your bowl game, not that you'll need it against VA Tech.
  
  Maybe Michigan will get their 2nd ever BCS win and first bowl win since Jan 1, 2008. 2-6 in the last decade in bowls, gotta improve that record.
  
  http://bentley.umich.edu/athdept/football/bowls/
  
  Now there's a shot for ya.

  Oooh, first since 2008! Good luck in your shit bowl, trying to get your first ever win against the SEC.
• dwccrew

  

  WebFire;1016412 wrote:I see, so there has to be 2 Heisman winners in the same bowl to be marketable. What a dumb ****ing post.

  To be on the same level both would have to be Heisman winners? LOL, Denard wasn't even mentioned after about 4 games in Heisman talk.
  
  It wasn't a dumb post, just a dumb interpretation by you.
  

  WebFire;1016415 wrote:Oooh, first since 2008! Good luck in your **** bowl, trying to get your first ever win against the SEC.

  This is plain wrong. OSU has beaten the SEC before. They have even won a bowl game against the SEC, but then self-vacated it. I didn't think you would have to resort to CGW like posts, I was just having a little fun with ya, didn't think you'd get all bent out of shape like little bitchy CGW.
• dwccrew

  

  Here, I'll make a post that you'll like..
  
  
  Oh what it would have been had Baylor and Michigan played in this bowl. Denard vs. RGIII would have been a dream match-up. Heisman winner vs. the best running back that plays quarterback. Sigh, I guess we'll just have to watch Denard run for 3 td's, throw for 2 td's and throw 2 picks.
• WebFire

  dwccrew;1016630 wrote:To be on the same level both would have to be Heisman winners? LOL, Denard wasn't even mentioned after about 4 games in Heisman talk.

  According to you. And I'm not sure what your second sentence of that has to do with this.
  

  dwccrew;1016630 wrote:This is plain wrong. OSU has beaten the SEC before. They have even won a bowl game against the SEC, but then self-vacated it. I didn't think you would have to resort to CGW like posts, I was just having a little fun with ya, didn't think you'd get all bent out of shape like little bitchy CGW.

  First ever bowl win. Vacate is vacate. If you want to be a dumbass about it, I will be too.
• dwccrew

  

  WebFire;1016634 wrote:According to you. And I'm not sure what your second sentence of that has to do with this.
  
  
  
  First ever bowl win. Vacate is vacate. If you want to be a dumbass about it, I will be too.

  I can't disagree, it would be their first recorded bowl win against the SEC, but they have beaten the SEC in a bowl game. You can't un-play the game, it just was erased from the record books, not reality.
• dave

  Denard is a terrible passer web, didn't you see how bad he was against all those 4 and 5 star recruits on the ohio state D.
• DeyDurkie5

  

  va tech by 12
• dwccrew

  

  dave;1017538 wrote:Denard is a terrible passer web, didn't you see how bad he was against all those 4 and 5 star recruits on the ohio state D.

  Can't say I disagree with the underlined part of your post. I don't think he did very bad against Ohio State's D, but then again OSU was a 6-6 team with a 3-5 B1G record, so not that impressive.
• Hb31187

  

  dwccrew;1018954 wrote:Can't say I disagree with the underlined part of your post. I don't think he did very bad against Ohio State's D, but then again OSU was a 6-6 team with a 3-5 B1G record, so not that impressive.

  Pryor ripping Michigan apart for a few years sure was though. Cant have it both ways
• WebFire

  [video=youtube;ncMzDz75Sd8][/video]
• dave

  dwccrew;1018954 wrote:Can't say I disagree with the underlined part of your post. I don't think he did very bad against Ohio State's D, but then again OSU was a 6-6 team with a 3-5 B1G record, so not that impressive.

  lol
• Tiernan

  Hope Hokies humiliate Hokey
• rmolin73

  

  Tiernan;1021499 wrote:Hope Hokies humiliate Hokey

  Wow how lame.
• dwccrew

  

  Hb31187;1019670 wrote:Pryor ripping Michigan apart for a few years sure was though. Cant have it both ways

  Please show me where I have ever said Pryor ripping Michigan was impressive. I haven't. Michigan the last 3 years was like playing Indiana for Ohio State. Nice try though. Also, this year's Ohio State team, as bad as they were, was a lot better than the 3 previous Michigan teams.
• FatHobbit

  

  dwccrew;1022719 wrote:Michigan the last 3 years was like playing Indiana for Ohio State. Nice try though. Also, this year's Ohio State team, as bad as they were, was a lot better than the 3 previous Michigan teams.

  Isn't it "funny" how much better UM was without RR? They were TERRIBLE the last three years and Hoke gets them a BCS bowl his first year.
• dwccrew

  

  FatHobbit;1022832 wrote:Isn't it "funny" how much better UM was without RR? They were TERRIBLE the last three years and Hoke gets them a BCS bowl his first year.

  RR is proof that the Big East is a joke of a conference. Hoke is 10X better and will make Michigan a contender and formidable opponent once again.
• Hb31187

  

  dwccrew;1022719 wrote:Please show me where I have ever said Pryor ripping Michigan was impressive. I haven't. Michigan the last 3 years was like playing Indiana for Ohio State. Nice try though. Also, this year's Ohio State team, as bad as they were, was a lot better than the 3 previous Michigan teams.

  Didnt mean you in particular. But pre-scandal plenty of OSU fans would of told you Pryor and his record vs michigan and his performances were impresive
• Classyposter58

  

  WebFire;1019898 wrote:[video=youtube;ncMzDz75Sd8][/video]

  That's kinda gay
• WebFire

  Yeah, highlights of football teams are gay. :rolleyes:
• dwccrew

  

  WebFire;1024839 wrote:Yeah, highlights of football teams are gay. :rolleyes:

  Definitely the one of the Notre Dame football players ice skating was.
• WebFire

  dwccrew;1025335 wrote:Definitely the one of the Notre Dame football players ice skating was.

  Very true.
• WebFire

  Brink and Heininger are out for this game. Even though Heininger is a starter, I think UM will be fine. I hurts depth more than anything. Good time for Campbell and Black to step and show they will lead the way next year.
• dave

  I'm about ready to write off Campbell. He better get his shit together or he might get passed over by some true freshmen next year.
  
  VT lost their 2nd string kicker now. Looks like they will be in 4 down territory when they are between the 15-35yrd lines.