Sugar Bowl: #13 Michigan def. #11 Virginia Tech, 23-20 (OT)
-
mervMichigan (10-2) will play Virginia Tech (11-2) in the Allstate Sugar Bowl. Airing on ESPN, Jan.3rd at 8:30. Who you got winning?
-
WebFireMichigan by 10. No wait. Vtech by 17.
-
sleeperMichigan by 30.
-
Tiger2003Hopefully Tech wins by 30. But I'll take scUM by a couple of touchdowns.
-
0311sdpIf Denard throws the ball well that day, Michigan wins, if he throws like he does about half the time (2-3 int.) VT wins.
-
vball10setVa Tech wins on a special teams play, more than likely a blocked punt returned for 6
VT 28
tsun 24 -
OneBuckeyeI think UM wins by at least 10. It will look like the Clemson VT games...
-
RRRockI think if Michigan takes care of the ball they win, 31-20.
-
dwccrewVA Tech and the ACC are about one to two steps above the Big East, which puts them 10 steps behind every other BCS conference. Michigan wins.
-
WebFireApparently these are the jerseys Michigan will be wearing.
-
Little DannyI think Michigan wins by two scores or more
Virginia Tech is a fraud and did not deserve a BCS bid. They lost to Clemson by a combined margin of 48 points. -
daveThose jerseys are a billion times better than the ones worn at MSU, can't believe someone thought they looked good.
I bet the Sugar Bowl is really regretting not taking Baylor now. VT can't sell tickets, which is why they were picked and RGIII being a heisman winner would have been a huge marketing tool. -
vball10set
Baylor vs. tsun? Now that would've been an exciting game, and a much better storyline...RGIII vs. Shoelace? wowdave;1013974 wrote:Those jerseys are a billion times better than the ones worn at MSU, can't believe someone thought they looked good.
I bet the Sugar Bowl is really regretting not taking Baylor now. VT can't sell tickets, which is why they were picked and RGIII being a heisman winner would have been a huge marketing tool. -
justincredibleVT sucks and didnt deserve this bid. I hope UM wins by a lot.
-
j_crazyIf denard is healthy this game should be ugly.
-
WebFire
I agree. Surprised they didn't go for that, even pre-Heisman.vball10set;1013982 wrote:Baylor vs. tsun? Now that would've been an exciting game, and a much better storyline...RGIII vs. Shoelace? wow -
georgemc80I would also enjoyed a Baylor UM game. UM wins this game, but it will be a nail biter.
-
bigkahuna
Yea, you don't even have to market it. It'd market itself.WebFire;1014040 wrote:I agree. Surprised they didn't go for that, even pre-Heisman. -
dwccrew
RGIII>Shoelace.......however, that'd be a helluva game.vball10set;1013982 wrote:Baylor vs. tsun? Now that would've been an exciting game, and a much better storyline...RGIII vs. Shoelace? wow
Va Tech is from the shitty ACC and will get blown out by Michigan. -
WebFire
Thank you for stating the obvious to get your shot in.dwccrew;1014894 wrote:RGIII>Shoelace.......however, that'd be a helluva game.
Va Tech is from the shitty ACC and will get blown out by Michigan. -
dwccrew
How is that getting my shot in? I think Michigan could beat several BCS teams this season. I wish they would have been matched up with a better team than a joke team from a joke conference.WebFire;1014978 wrote:Thank you for stating the obvious to get your shot in. -
WebFire
RGIII>DR was your shot.dwccrew;1015085 wrote:How is that getting my shot in? I think Michigan could beat several BCS teams this season. I wish they would have been matched up with a better team than a joke team from a joke conference. -
dwccrew
It's not true? I just thought it was a bad comparison on Vball's part. RGIII is WAY better than Denard. Yes it is obvious, but it wasn't to him apparently. Don't be so sensitive, you guys won.WebFire;1015169 wrote:RGIII>DR was your shot. -
WebFire
He wasn't comparing. He was saying it would be a good marketing matchup, which it would. No one said DR was better, but you felt the need to say the obvious. A clear shot. Don't be so sensitive, you guys lost.dwccrew;1015257 wrote:It's not true? I just thought it was a bad comparison on Vball's part. RGIII is WAY better than Denard. Yes it is obvious, but it wasn't to him apparently. Don't be so sensitive, you guys won. -
sleeper
Webfire is nowhere near as sensitive as any Notre Dame fan.dwccrew;1015257 wrote:It's not true? I just thought it was a bad comparison on Vball's part. RGIII is WAY better than Denard. Yes it is obvious, but it wasn't to him apparently. Don't be so sensitive, you guys won.