Archive

Disgusted with Progressives

  • queencitybuckeye
    ptown_trojans_1;1881570 wrote:Last I looked Bill Clinton isn't running for anything.
    No, but you can't have it both ways. He is a sexual predator, period (as is Biden if you want to go more recent). You can't claim they were fit to serve and Moore is not. It's one way or the other.
  • O-Trap
    Spock;1881667 wrote:duh [...] hypocracy

    like_that;1881676 wrote:Can you imagine being a parent of a 13 year old teenage girl and a 30 year old man asks you to date her? This is why you all should have guns.
    Fuck, it's Alabama. They do all have guns.
  • fish82
    BoatShoes;1881665 wrote:I do not trust any poll that says a Democrat will win in Alabama. People too embarassed to say over the phone that they still support Moore but they will not pull the lever for a Democrat IMHO.
    Agreed. He’s going to win...and it ought not even be that close. Best case for the GOP is probably to let him run the clock out, and then get him to step aside so the governor can appoint Luther or another replacement.
  • salto
    Heretic;1881675 wrote:Doesn't take a Sherlock Holmes-level of deductive reasoning to figure you out, lol.
    He plays kickball for a living, cut him some slack.
  • CenterBHSFan
    So, this happened:
    [h=1]Can My Children Be Friends With White People?[/h]
    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/11/opinion/sunday/interracial-friendship-donald-trump.html
  • like_that
  • CenterBHSFan
    I actually am subscribed to RedPillBlack, she's a hoot! I don't agree with everything she says, but I agree with a lot of things.
  • CenterBHSFan
    I actually am subscribed to RedPillBlack, she's a hoot! I don't agree with everything she says, but I agree with a lot of things.

    And now I'm going to have to login to Twittah!

    *edit*

    Not sure what happened with the 'edit post' hiccuping.
  • like_that
    I actually never heard of her, until a couple days ago I saw a clip of Dave Rubin trying to moderate a discussion between her and somebody else. It didn't go well apparently.
  • CenterBHSFan
    like_that;1881890 wrote:I actually never heard of her, until a couple days ago I saw a clip of Dave Rubin trying to moderate a discussion between her and somebody else. It didn't go well apparently.
    Blair White. Yeah, I saw it... cringeworthy lol
  • CenterBHSFan
    So now, regressives are targetting children's fairy tales, such as Sleeping Beauty, because they worry that it doesn't teach young boys about the need for "consent".

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcthree/item/348b95fd-81d6-46d4-827e-73c727b8ceb6
  • majorspark
  • like_that


    A couple days late with this one, but yes this is a real article. Also, yes it was written by a white male [emoji23]. Who the hell reads this shit and takes it seriously?

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/25/opinion/sunday/harassment-men-libido-masculinity.html
  • SportsAndLady
    Matt Lauer fired from NBC for sexual misconduct in the workplace. At NBC, that probably means he winked at a girl in the hallway. Interested to see what happened.
  • like_that
    SportsAndLady;1883810 wrote:Matt Lauer fired from NBC for sexual misconduct in the workplace. At NBC, that probably means he winked at a girl in the hallway. Interested to see what happened.
    It’s funnier when you recall that he drilled Bill O’Reilly recently in his interview [emoji23].
  • CenterBHSFan
    like_that;1883800 wrote: A couple days late with this one, but yes this is a real article. Also, yes it was written by a white male [emoji23]. Who the hell reads this shit and takes it seriously?

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/25/opinion/sunday/harassment-men-libido-masculinity.html
    Beta males/submissives write this shit.

    Here are a few excerpts from that article that should be disturbing to everyone:
    The (very few) prominent men who are speaking up now basically just insist that men need to be better feminists — as if the past few weeks have not amply demonstrated that the ideologies of men are irrelevant.
    Liberalism has tended to confront gender problems from a technocratic point of view: improved systems, improved laws, better health. That approach has resulted in plenty of triumphs. But there remains no cure for human desire. (“It isn’t actually about sex, it’s about power,” I read in The Guardian the other day. How naïve must you be not to understand that sex itself is about power every bit as much as it’s about pleasure?)
    The crisis we are approaching is fundamental: How can healthy sexuality ever occur in conditions in which men and women are not equal?
    It is not morality but culture — accepting our monstrosity, reckoning with it — that can save us. If anything can.
    Apparently, men are supposed to lose any masculine identity that they have. We are dictated to by a progressive community who worships at the alter of intersectionality. In other words, the new religious left. This community segregates, is prejudicial, dictates who can have sexuality and who can not, has established a hierarchy of vicitimhood and clearly has a deep-seeded hatred for anybody who is straight/white/male and is comfortable in their own skin. This is why men are supposed to be singled out, lose their gender and kneel at the feet of post modern intersectionality which tells them that they are the putrid scum of the earth.

    Fuck off progressives.
  • QuakerOats
    CenterBHSFan;1883814 wrote:Apparently, men are supposed to lose any masculine identity that they have. We are dictated to by a progressive community who worships at the alter of intersectionality. In other words, the new religious left. This community segregates, is prejudicial, dictates who can have sexuality and who can not, has established a hierarchy of vicitimhood and clearly has a deep-seeded hatred for anybody who is straight/white/male and is comfortable in their own skin. This is why men are supposed to be singled out, lose their gender and kneel at the feet of post modern intersectionality which tells them that they are the putrid scum of the earth.

    Fuck off progressives.



    Bingo
  • gut
    like_that;1883800 wrote: A couple days late with this one, but yes this is a real article. Also, yes it was written by a white male [emoji23]. Who the hell reads this shit and takes it seriously?
    NYT and CNN have really fallen off a cliff to new lows since Trump became POTUS.

    Progressives just keep getting worse and worse. You really didn't hear a whole lot about inequality and the like during the 90's and early 00's (aside from the GLBA movement). Heck, I remember when it wasn't about gender "identity" but gender "neutral" and not letting society define you (which actually sounds pretty reasonable).

    Blame identity politics. Hopefully Dems get slaughtered again (doubtful) and start to see the light.
  • gut
    SportsAndLady;1883810 wrote:Matt Lauer fired from NBC for sexual misconduct in the workplace. At NBC, that probably means he winked at a girl in the hallway. Interested to see what happened.
    I don't know anything about Lauer, but although most of this has sounded closer to sexual assault, I wonder how much is "flattery" blown into worse by feminazis.

    By that I mean most guys were raised that it was nice to complement a woman's dress or new haircut, even work colleagues. We "learned" many woman like to be pursued and play hard-to-get...so it's not hard to imagine some of this is little more than being offended over being asked to drinks, or asked out a few times. Certain types of innocent touching - which undoubtedly makes uninterested women uncomfortable - are also a common and popular form of flirtation and seduction.

    I don't really believe that's the issue in these high profile stories, but, wow, better tread extremely lightly around women at work.
  • Dr Winston O'Boogie
    I see Trump's been tweeting quite a bit recently on the "fake news". That suggests that he knows about something that will be coming out that is less than positive for him (and then he can call it "fake news" and benefit from his followers having been prepared with his propaganda).
  • Spock
    gut;1883829 wrote:I don't know anything about Lauer, but although most of this has sounded closer to sexual assault, I wonder how much is "flattery" blown into worse by feminazis.

    By that I mean most guys were raised that it was nice to complement a woman's dress or new haircut, even work colleagues. We "learned" many woman like to be pursued and play hard-to-get...so it's not hard to imagine some of this is little more than being offended over being asked to drinks, or asked out a few times. Certain types of innocent touching - which undoubtedly makes uninterested women uncomfortable - are also a common and popular form of flirtation and seduction.

    I don't really believe that's the issue in these high profile stories, but, wow, better tread extremely lightly around women at work.
    thought about this......blowback will be that males arent going to hire females.....too risky. Then we will here that BS.
  • gut
    Dr Winston O'Boogie;1883840 wrote:I see Trump's been tweeting quite a bit recently on the "fake news". That suggests that he knows about something that will be coming out that is less than positive for him (and then he can call it "fake news" and benefit from his followers having been prepared with his propaganda).
    Well, Flynn is reportedly working on a plea deal....so the above is a distinct possibility.
  • Dr Winston O'Boogie
    gut;1883829 wrote:I don't know anything about Lauer, but although most of this has sounded closer to sexual assault, I wonder how much is "flattery" blown into worse by feminazis.

    By that I mean most guys were raised that it was nice to complement a woman's dress or new haircut, even work colleagues. We "learned" many woman like to be pursued and play hard-to-get...so it's not hard to imagine some of this is little more than being offended over being asked to drinks, or asked out a few times. Certain types of innocent touching - which undoubtedly makes uninterested women uncomfortable - are also a common and popular form of flirtation and seduction.

    I don't really believe that's the issue in these high profile stories, but, wow, better tread extremely lightly around women at work.
    Don't lose sight that most of this stuff has taken place in Hollywood and the news media, neither of which are representative of the typical industries that make up most of America. I work for a large company and none of this kind of stuff goes on. I mean the "open secret" type of behavior that seems to be at the heart of most of these accusations. My point is that this is really a phenomenon affecting entertainment and news media "talent" where normal rules of behavior are not always practiced.
  • like_that
    Dr Winston O'Boogie;1883843 wrote:Don't lose sight that most of this stuff has taken place in Hollywood and the news media, neither of which are representative of the typical industries that make up most of America. I work for a large company and none of this kind of stuff goes on. I mean the "open secret" type of behavior that seems to be at the heart of most of these accusations. My point is that this is really a phenomenon affecting entertainment and news media "talent" where normal rules of behavior are not always practiced.
    What’s your point? Most people are aware of this.
  • gut
    Dr Winston O'Boogie;1883843 wrote:My point is that this is really a phenomenon affecting entertainment and news media "talent" where normal rules of behavior are not always practiced.
    Good point, but there's also been more than a few stories coming out of Silicon Valley.

    Also, this behavior isn't exactly uncommon on Wall Street. I really don't think it's just a Hollywood/Media thing....I think anywhere you have rich, powerful guys 50+ there's a good chance one or more are guilty of this.

    I'd also add you don't get a trophy wife by sitting on your hands (no pun intended). Most women are not gold diggers, but enough are that I think a lot of these rich guys get pretty aggressive fishing for them.