Archive

Impressed by Trump administration

  • sleeper
    gut;1847852 wrote:Abortion should be fast, convenient and free. Isn't that how the saying goes?
    Free? No.

    Fast and convenient? Absolutely. Republican lawyers and lawmakers spend billions collectively instituting TRAP laws across the country that have routinely been struck down by the Supreme Court. In order to circumvent Roe vs. Wade, they are aiming to make abortion very expensive, unavailable, and impossible to get.
  • Con_Alma
    I never had a desire to be a member of the Republican party but I have to admit, sleeper is making me reconsider based on all the things they are apparently fighting for that I am in favor of.
  • gut
    in Designer Baby future, abortion will be re-branded "returns & exchanges"
  • sleeper
    Con_Alma;1847856 wrote:I never had a desire to be a member of the Republican party but I have to admit, sleeper is making me reconsider based on all the things they are apparently fighting for that I am in favor of.
    Wasting billions each year jamming up the courts with frivolous laws designed to appease constituents? That's productive and helpful for the economy and progress!
  • sleeper
    gut;1847854 wrote:Don't worry, Medicaid already covers their abortion.
    This isn't Fox News. This is factual inaccurate. Sorry!
  • gut
    sleeper;1847862 wrote:This isn't Fox News. This is factual inaccurate. Sorry!
    Wrong again.

    https://www.aclu.org/other/public-funding-abortion
    "At present, the federal Medicaid program mandates abortion funding in cases of rape or incest, as well as when a pregnant woman's life is endangered by a physical disorder, illness, or injury."
  • sleeper
    gut;1847864 wrote:Wrong again.

    https://www.aclu.org/other/public-funding-abortion
    "At present, the federal Medicaid program mandates abortion funding in cases of rape or incest, as well as when a pregnant woman's life is endangered by a physical disorder, illness, or injury."
    Well I don't agree with that. Abortions should not be taxpayer funded.
  • gut
    sleeper;1847865 wrote:Well I don't agree with that. Abortions should not be taxpayer funded.
    You are really owning failure in this thread.

    Maybe you should try watching Fox News. You might learn something.
  • O-Trap
    sleeper;1847865 wrote:Well I don't agree with that. Abortions should not be taxpayer funded.
  • Con_Alma
    sleeper;1847860 wrote:Wasting billions each year jamming up the courts with frivolous laws designed to appease constituents? That's productive and helpful for the economy and progress!

    I'm impressed with the lengths you claim they go to in appeasing their constituents. It's just another thing you make the party sound appealing by sharing. I'm thankful for this thread.
  • sleeper
    gut;1847866 wrote:You are really owning failure in this thread.

    Maybe you should try watching Fox News. You might learn something.
    I thought you were still spending your time lying about PP and federally funded abortions. My bad for not catching the switch.

    But I do watch Fox News. It's entertainment to watch conservative propaganda paraded around as fact.
  • sleeper
    Con_Alma;1847868 wrote:I'm impressed with the lengths you claim they go to in appeasing their constituents. It's just another thing you make the party sound appealing by sharing. I'm thankful for this thread.
    You're welcome. Donald Trump is the leader of the Republican party! Enjoy!
  • gut
    sleeper;1847869 wrote:I thought you were still spending your time lying about PP and federally funded abortions. My bad for not catching the switch.
    There was no switch Medicaid pays DIRECTLY, and indirectly, for abortion. LIke I said, you should spend some time actually doing the research you pretended to do....and not just assume everything you refuse to believe is a lie originating from Fox News.
  • Con_Alma
    I wouldn't be looking for enjoyment per se but If if Pres Trump continues the trend of the types of EOs he's signed and the types of judge nominations he's put forth then I can see me realizing some enjoyment from it.
  • sleeper
    gut;1847872 wrote:There was no switch Medicaid pays DIRECTLY, and indirectly, for abortion. LIke I said, you should spend some time actually doing the research you pretended to do....and not just assume everything you refuse to believe is a lie originating from Fox News.
    I am talking 100% about PP and they don't get reimbursement for abortions.

    I will continue to fight to protect access to healthcare for low income communities; Republicans can be the party of 1800 regressive ideology, bigotry, ignorance and hating poor people.

    Donald Trump is a Republican. Enjoy!
  • sleeper
    Con_Alma;1847873 wrote:I wouldn't be looking for enjoyment per se but If if Pres Trump continues the trend of the types of EOs he's signed and the types of judge nominations he's put forth then I can see me realizing some enjoyment from it.
    So you were okay with Obama's EO?

    Why does the party of small government spend so much time acting like big brother when it comes to bathrooms people use and the choices they make between themselves and their doctor?
  • Con_Alma
    sleeper;1847875 wrote:So you were okay with Obama's EO?

    Why does the party of small government spend so much time acting like big brother when it comes to bathrooms people use and the choices they make between themselves and their doctor?
    It depends on which EO you are speaking of....some yes but most no. We have difference in ideology.

    I can't answer your second question because I'm not in the know but maybe to appease you constituents as you've claimed above.
  • sleeper
    Con_Alma;1847877 wrote:It depends on which EO you are speaking of....some yes but most no. We have difference in ideology.

    I can't answer your second question because I'm not in the know but maybe to appease you constituents as you've claimed above.
    Why don't you believe in separation of church and state? Why do you feel you get the right to impose your regressive religious ideology on other people? Why do you feel you have the right to restrict the rights of others based on an unproven book that you were indoctrinated at birth to believe is correct which no evidence has ever been able to confirm? Why do you feel women should be considered 2nd class citizens with a life only destined for child birth and taking care of the homestead?

    Please defend your hateful, regressive, 1800's ideology. Thanks!
  • Con_Alma
    sleeper;1847879 wrote:Why don't you believe in separation of church and state? Why do you feel you get the right to impose your regressive religious ideology on other people? Why do you feel you have the right to restrict the rights of others based on an unproven book that you were indoctrinated at birth to believe is correct which no evidence has ever been able to confirm? Why do you feel women should be considered 2nd class citizens with a life only destined for child birth and taking care of the homestead?

    Please defend your hateful, regressive, 1800's ideology. Thanks!
    I do believe in the establishment clause and free exercise clause.

    I don't have the right to impose my religious views on anyone. I don't have the right to restrict others rights nor do they have the right to do so to mine.

    What book do you think I was indoctrinated by at birth? ....certainly not eh Holy Bible. I addressed that issue with you long again. I didn't become a Christian until my 20s.

    I don't believe women are second class citizens.
  • sleeper
    Con_Alma;1847880 wrote:I do believe in the establishment clause and free exercise clause.

    I don't have the right to impose my religious views on anyone. I don't have the right to restrict others rights nor do they have the right to do so to mine.

    What book do you think I was indoctrinated by at birth? ....certainly not eh Holy Bible. I addressed that issue with you long again. I didn't become a Christian until my 20s.

    I don't believe women are second class citizens.
    I have faith that you believe women are second class citizens. Why do you think society should be constructed on faith and not facts? Why are your feelings more important than facts?
  • like_that
    sleeper;1847883 wrote:I have faith that you believe women are second class citizens.
    He sure does. http://www.ohiochatter.com/forum/showthread.php?48227-Impressed-by-Trump-administration&p=1847767&viewfull=1#post1847767
  • sleeper
    I will pray for your redemption.
  • like_that
    sleeper;1847886 wrote:I will pray for your redemption.
    We are all praying for yours. Lying to mask your sins won't help.
  • Con_Alma
    sleeper;1847883 wrote:I have faith that you believe women are second class citizens. Why do you think society should be constructed on faith and not facts? Why are your feelings more important than facts?
    I've tried to answer your questions but you don't answer mine. Why is that?

    Society isn't constructed on faith that I'm aware of and I don't think it should be. I don't believe my feelings are important to anyone other than my family as far as I'm aware.

    Why are you making assumptions?
  • BoatShoes
    gut;1847847 wrote:One of several mechanisms, not the only one nor the primary one. And not universal to all oral contraceptives.

    And essentially the Hobby Lobby case.
    It is a third mechanism of action for all oral contraceptives. They all materially reduce the endometrium and we know from in vitro that a reduced endometrium greatly reduces the likelihood of implantation.