Impressed by Trump administration
-
like_that
This.queencitybuckeye;1833936 wrote:At the end of the day, it was 100% a self-inflicted wound. The professionals in this case followed the lead of their boss, to all of their detriment. Facts notwithstanding, they looked like idiots because they acted and spoke as idiots. The correct answer was a polished version of "who cares" combined with "scoreboard, bitches".
They took the media bait and now have to deal with it. A simple "we have moved on from the inauguration and now we are focused on MAGA!" would have ended any of that narrative. -
sleeper
21 million viewers in 2009.fish82;1833934 wrote:Trump also had 16.9 million viewers on the CNN website alone, and at least a couple more on other sites. Again..."viewed" vs. "attended."
He lied. -
Spocksleeper;1833956 wrote:21 million viewers in 2009.
He lied.
get over it. nobody cares -
sleeper
Trump does.Spock;1833973 wrote:get over it. nobody cares
He lied. -
O-Trap
That.queencitybuckeye;1833936 wrote:At the end of the day, it was 100% a self-inflicted wound. The professionals in this case followed the lead of their boss, to all of their detriment. Facts notwithstanding, they looked like idiots because they acted and spoke as idiots. The correct answer was a polished version of "who cares" combined with "scoreboard, bitches".
Honestly, who gives a shit about the turnout?
We're about to have four insanely petty years. -
queencitybuckeye
For reasons unknown, the President.O-Trap;1834012 wrote:That.
Honestly, who gives a shit about the turnout?
-
QuakerOatssleeper;1833836 wrote:Federal hiring freeze will cost more money than no freeze at all. This is why President's stopped using them.
But don't let facts get in the way of your alternative facts.
Yes, that makes perfect sense. That is why that talking point emanated from government.
Keep trolling... -
ptown_trojans_1
Last time there was an across the board hiring freeze was during the early 80s and the GAO stated it did more harm than good.QuakerOats;1834019 wrote:Yes, that makes perfect sense. That is why that talking point emanated from government.
Keep trolling...
http://www.gao.gov/assets/140/137055.pdf
I'll also note, the language in the Executive order (which is not posted fully online yet btw), is really vague and the DOD and VA are scrambling to see if that applies to them as well. -
QuakerOatsfish82;1833934 wrote:Trump also had 16.9 million viewers on the CNN website alone, and at least a couple more on other sites. Again..."viewed" vs. "attended."
Correct. But the libs are suffering from chronic Trump Derangement Syndrome, and nothing else matters right now except their feelings, interpretations, and suicidal tendencies. I presume they will be asking for free counseling soon. -
QuakerOatsDay 2: major pipeline projects put back in play. Thank you, Mr. President.
-
QuakerOats
Government always protects itself.ptown_trojans_1;1834020 wrote:Last time there was an across the board hiring freeze was during the early 80s and the GAO stated it did more harm than good.
http://www.gao.gov/assets/140/137055.pdf
I'll also note, the language in the Executive order (which is not posted fully online yet btw), is really vague and the DOD and VA are scrambling to see if that applies to them as well.
Drain the swamp. -
ptown_trojans_1
I like that, when can we see the text of the order?QuakerOats;1834022 wrote:Day 2: major pipeline projects put back in play. Thank you, Mr. President.
Also, WTF does he really believe there was 3-4M in voter fraud? That is indefensible right now. -
ptown_trojans_1
It is the fucking GAO....QuakerOats;1834023 wrote:Government always protects itself.
Drain the swamp. -
QuakerOatsptown_trojans_1;1834025 wrote:It is the fucking GAO....
Thank you. They have an impeccable track record when it comes to numbers. -
ptown_trojans_1
Seriously?QuakerOats;1834030 wrote:Thank you. They have an impeccable track record when it comes to numbers.
I think you are confusing the GAO with the CBO.... -
QuakerOatsptown_trojans_1;1834024 wrote:I like that, when can we see the text of the order?
Also, WTF does he really believe there was 3-4M in voter fraud? That is indefensible right now.
I would think 1-2 million anyway ...............but until we move to proper voter ID, it is hard to quantify. -
O-Trapqueencitybuckeye;1834015 wrote:For reasons unknown, the President.
-
QuakerOatsptown_trojans_1;1834031 wrote:Seriously?
I think you are confusing the GAO with the CBO....
Having fewer employees is less costly than having more employees. I understand it is a difficult and complex equation.
Government is not an entity whose charge it is is to grow and gain market share, and thus having more employees, such as in sales and revenue development, is desirable and will result in bottom line gains.
Is there a KoolAid Anonymous chapter near you? -
ptown_trojans_1
Hey, all I was saying was the GAO reported after the fact, in the 80s, that in fact that was not the case. It actually cost the Gov. more to have the freeze than not. That may or may not apply to today.QuakerOats;1834035 wrote:Having fewer employees is less costly than having more employees. I understand it is a difficult and complex equation.
Government is not an entity whose charge it is is to grow and gain market share, and thus having more employees, such as in sales and revenue development, is desirable and will result in bottom line gains.
Is there a KoolAid Anonymous chapter near you?
Is the Gov. bloated, yes, just look at the back end of the DOD.
But, it has to be done the right way. Just slapping a freeze is kind of dumb as honestly we have been in a freeze for some agencies since sequestration.
Also, will the freeze impact the VA or the DOD? That is unclear right now. The VA does not need a freeze right now. -
like_that
Did they also prevent contracting outside of the government in the 80's? This current memo is preventing agencies from doing that.ptown_trojans_1;1834036 wrote:Hey, all I was saying was the GAO reported after the fact, in the 80s, that in fact that was not the case. It actually cost the Gov. more to have the freeze than not. That may or may not apply to today.
Is the Gov. bloated, yes, just look at the back end of the DOD.
But, it has to be done the right way. Just slapping a freeze is kind of dumb as honestly we have been in a freeze for some agencies since sequestration.
I think trump wants to make some serious slashes to certain departments and agencies. There is more to this and if he does make those cuts, then I don't see how the freeze can't save money. I think we are about to see some big cuts to the EPA, and I can't say I will shed any tears for them. -
QuakerOatsI have been dealing with the VA for over 3 years; they need more than a freeze; they need a complete gutting and then a rebuild.
-
sleeper
He's still claiming he won the popular vote because of 3 million fraudulent votes and talking to Congress about it.O-Trap;1834012 wrote:That.
Honestly, who gives a shit about the turnout?
We're about to have four insanely petty years.
Also, rumors are Trump is unhappy in the White House because he doesn't feel like people think he's a REAL President. What a special snow flake. -
sleeper
QO probably cited the GAO when it looked bad for Obama but now its fake news.ptown_trojans_1;1834031 wrote:Seriously?
I think you are confusing the GAO with the CBO....
Hail Trump! -
O-Trap
I mean, EVEN if we allow for that, what TF does that have to do with the inauguration turnout?sleeper;1834048 wrote:He's still claiming he won the popular vote because of 3 million fraudulent votes and talking to Congress about it.
He really seems like it. Quite the petty motherfucker.sleeper;1834048 wrote:Also, rumors are Trump is unhappy in the White House because he doesn't feel like people think he's a REAL President. What a special snow flake. -
bases_loaded