Archive

Disgusted with Trump administration - Part I

  • fish82
    sleeper;1846256 wrote:You made a claim that you now can't support. LOL

    SAD
    I did? What did I claim?
  • like_that
    gut;1846257 wrote:
    Sticky wages [emoji23]
  • BoatShoes
    fish82;1846250 wrote:I'd probably just defer to the numerous business leaders crediting his business-friendly and anti-regulation stance as the main reason for their hiring.

    At the end of the day, if the trend continues...he gets credit for it. No amount of assclench on your part will change that.


    With the Trump administration's preliminary plans for a $1 trillion infrastructure plan on the table, firms are likely expanding their staffs to prepare for an uptick in project opportunities in the coming months and years. While architecture billings reported a down month in January, economists say the foundation for a strong market is in place
    Markets are expecting large keynesian stimulus through tax cuts, defense and infrastructure. Hopefully the freedom caucus can swallow it otherwise...
  • O-Trap
    sleeper;1846252 wrote:

    ^ Obama's Presidency. Thanks Obama!
    When I looked at this, it made me think of the book The Grapes of Wrath (I fucking hate Steinbeck.).

    The family started out poor and in the middle of a natural disaster (drought and windstorm, I believe). A whole bunch of shit happened between then and the end, but in the end, they were poor and in the middle of a natural disaster (a flood). No real improvement. Just a bunch of shit in the middle.
  • iclfan2
    Gorsuch was the best appointee in a looong time. The fact that this is the hill the Dems decided to die on was stupid. Ooh garlands seat blah blah. Bunch of babies. And had the Dems won, they'd have invoked the nuclear option themselves.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • gut
    iclfan2;1846272 wrote:The fact that this is the hill the Dems decided to die on was stupid.
    There's no way Ginsburg is hanging on another 4 years. Trump could end-up replacing 3 liberal justices. Applications for Canadian citizenship will spike....
  • Spock
    gut;1846277 wrote:There's no way Ginsburg is hanging on another 4 years. Trump could end-up replacing 3 liberal justices. Applications for Canadian citizenship will spike....
    Good they can leave
  • like_that
    gut;1846277 wrote:There's no way Ginsburg is hanging on another 4 years. Trump could end-up replacing 3 liberal justices. Applications for Canadian citizenship will spike....
    lol, what makes you think this?
  • gut
    like_that;1846282 wrote:lol, what makes you think this?
    She's 83, had cancer twice and heart problems.
  • like_that
    gut;1846283 wrote:She's 83, had cancer twice and heart problems.
    I think she will fight thru the next election.
  • Spock
    like_that;1846284 wrote:I think she will fight thru the next election.
    We shall see. If she crokes trump presidency could be legendary
  • iclfan2
    Aaaand we are bombing syria


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • superman
    iclfan2;1846290 wrote:Aaaand we are bombing syria


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    This is bullshit. I can't believe this false flag operation worked.
  • Spock
    About time we have a potus with some testicals
  • Spock
    And cue the images of dead babies (that weren't never part of the bombings)
  • friendfromlowry
    Spock;1846296 wrote:About time we have a potus with some testicals
    /Redneck'd
  • iclfan2
    Red line...


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Spock
    iclfan2;1846302 wrote:Red line...


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Trump doesn't need to lay out a red lines. Those are for leaders that play politics with lives.
  • iclfan2
    That was my point. Lot of talk with the last administration. Just don't put boots on the ground.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Spock
    iclfan2;1846306 wrote:That was my point. Lot of talk with the last administration. Just don't put boots on the ground.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    I don't think we should either but creating a vacuum in Syria isn't good
  • Spock
    Russians on the base that was bombed. Interesting.
  • SportsAndLady
    Haven't we been bombing Syria for a while?
  • gut
    SportsAndLady;1846311 wrote:Haven't we been bombing Syria for a while?
    I think we've been bombing ISIL targets (with drones), but this would be our first attack on the state of Syria.
  • O-Trap
    SportsAndLady;1846311 wrote:Haven't we been bombing Syria for a while?
    We have.

    Those who supported it then, but don't want to support it now, will find a distinction.

    Those who didn't support it then, but want to support it now, will find a distinction.

    But the outcome is the same. We're bombing Syria. People will die. Some will be intended targets. Many will not. Those people's families and loved ones will find a nearby group best equipped to fight against those doing the bombing and their allies. Said groups will, more than likely, be radical terrorist groups.

    And the cycle will continue, as it has for decades.
  • O-Trap
    Spock;1846304 wrote: Those are for leaders that play politics with lives.
    Bombing like this is taking lives and driving fresh blood into terrorist organizations. It's the creation, or revival, of an enemy.

    That about as close to playing politics with lives as it gets.