Archive

Disgusted with obama administration - Part II

  • like_that
    QuakerOats;1798081 wrote:
    Published June 07, 2016 Washington Free Beacon



    Nearly half of Washington, D.C. employers said they have either laid off employees or reduced the hours of employees to adapt to the District of Columbia’s minimum wage hikes since 2014, according to a report from the Employment Policies Institute.




    Liberalism always generates the exact opposite of its stated intent.
    When can we get these jackasses off the backs of business.
    They are trying to push for $15 min wage in DC. It will only get worse.
  • QuakerOats
    http://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2016-06-09/u-s-taxpayers-are-funding-iran-s-military-expansion


    Lovely --- US taxpayers funding Iran's military. The imposter in the WH should be jailed.


    And no, Trump would not have made that 'deal'.
  • Heretic
    QuakerOats;1798473 wrote:http://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2016-06-09/u-s-taxpayers-are-funding-iran-s-military-expansion


    Lovely --- US taxpayers funding Iran's military. The imposter in the WH should be jailed.


    And no, Trump would not have made that 'deal'.
    True. Supplying Iran with weapons was more of a Reagan thing.
  • QuakerOats
    There was never a doubt that you would give obama & clinton another pass.
  • QuakerOats
    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jul/12/obama-admin-sent-taxpayer-money-oust-netanyahu/


    Incredible ...............................again.

    January '17 cannot arrive soon enough.
  • majorspark
    Heretic;1798511 wrote:True. Supplying Iran with weapons was more of a Reagan thing.
    I am just wondering how long do the wrongs of a prior president get to be used to minimize the criticism of the wrongs of a current president. Obviously it transcends the grave.
  • Heretic
    majorspark;1803156 wrote:I am just wondering how long do the wrongs of a prior president get to be used to minimize the criticism of the wrongs of a current president. Obviously it transcends the grave.
    Lol, on this site, I've seen people who praise what Clinton did in his presidency immediately get "corrected" by people saying that all of that was because of Reagan. Shit runs both ways.
  • jmog
    Heretic;1803199 wrote:Lol, on this site, I've seen people who praise what Clinton did in his presidency immediately get "corrected" by people saying that all of that was because of Reagan. Shit runs both ways.
    You could be correct, but most conservatives I have seen usually credit what Clinton did to the flip from D to R in the HoR (Gringrich/Contract with America) 2 years into his Presidency. I hardly ever see Reagan being used against Clinton's accomplishments.
  • Spock
    Clinton didnt have any accomplishments. He just happen to be the president during the electronics/internet boom of the 90"s. NAFTA and doubling down on the fair housing act from Carter were a total mistake. Clinton did nothing in regards to foreign policy. You can literally thank him for modern day terrorism since 9/11
  • Heretic
    Spock;1803367 wrote:Clinton didnt have any accomplishments. He just happen to be the president during the electronics/internet boom of the 90"s. NAFTA and doubling down on the fair housing act from Carter were a total mistake. Clinton did nothing in regards to foreign policy. You can literally thank him for modern day terrorism since 9/11
    The only thing keeping me from laughing about how OC Cons cry when people bring up Bush in regards to Obama's failing, but then have no problems bringing up Clinton in regards to failings after he left office is that you're so hilariously stupid about virtually every topic you offer "insight" on that you come off as more an over-the-top parody of a conservative than the real deal, so I doubt any of the people here capable of actual thought would be willing to claim you.
  • like_that
    Heretic;1803398 wrote:The only thing keeping me from laughing about how OC Cons cry when people bring up Bush in regards to Obama's failing, but then have no problems bringing up Clinton in regards to failings after he left office is that you're so hilariously stupid about virtually every topic you offer "insight" on that you come off as more an over-the-top parody of a conservative than the real deal, so I doubt any of the people here capable of actual thought would be willing to claim you.
    You're quoting ccrunner and grouping everyone else with him. Don't be a ptown.
  • Heretic
    like_that;1803419 wrote:You're quoting ccrunner and grouping everyone else with him. Don't be a ptown.
    Did you read anything after the "you're so hilariously stupid"? You know, like the part where I said I doubted anyone on here capable of actual thought would claim him?
  • like_that
    Heretic;1803476 wrote:Did you read anything after the "you're so hilariously stupid"? You know, like the part where I said I doubted anyone on here capable of actual thought would claim him?
    I was drunj.
  • Heretic
    like_that;1803477 wrote:I was drunj.
    Lol, understandable. Especially now that I look at the time of posting.
  • like_that
    Heretic;1803479 wrote:Lol, understandable. Especially now that I look at the time of posting.
    lol, I actually read the whole post too. I obviously didn't comprehend it at the time.
  • QuakerOats
    http://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-sent-cash-to-iran-as-americans-were-freed-1470181874


    obama sends $400 million in cash to his friends in Iran, just as prisoners are released.

    What is left for this jackass to do ............
  • Devils Advocate
    QuakerOats;1805501 wrote:http://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-sent-cash-to-iran-as-americans-were-freed-1470181874


    obama sends $400 million in cash to his friends in Iran, just as prisoners are released.

    What is left for this jackass to do ............
    Give them the rest of their money, dickhead.
    http://www.breitbart.com/video/2016/08/03/kirby-400-million-payment-to-iran-wasnt-ransom-we-gave-them-their-money/
  • Spock
    haha what a joke. That money might have been a payback but it surely was part of the deal to release those guys. THat means it was a ransom
  • QuakerOats
    Sure, why not, they need to continue funding this: Report [h=3]July, 2016[/h]July Attacks - 167
    Killed - 1549
    Injured - 2168
    Suicide Blasts - 29
    Countries - 23
    List of Attacks
  • QuakerOats
    Today's links ...

    IRAN SHOWS OFF RANSOM CASH...
    'EXPENSIVE PRICE' TO FREE HOSTAGES...
    PLANE WAITED UNTIL MONEY ARRIVED...
    'WIN-LOSE DEAL THAT HURTS USA'...
    PAPER: HOW TEHRAN SPENT WINDFALL...
    ISRAEL REJECTS OBAMA REMARKS ON NUKE DEAL...





    The last item is especially embarrassing for obama .........not sure how he keeps a straight face
  • QuakerOats
    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/08/11/house-probe-central-command-reports-skewed-intel-on-isis-fight.html


    Some wonder why we cannot trust this administration ............
  • CenterBHSFan
    Ptown, can you shed some light on this?

    http://www.reuters.com/article/us-iran-nuclear-exemptions-exclusive-idUSKCN1173LA
  • like_that
    CenterBHSFan;1809291 wrote:Ptown, can you shed some light on this?

    http://www.reuters.com/article/us-iran-nuclear-exemptions-exclusive-idUSKCN1173LA
    Give him time to come up with the spin.
  • superman
    CenterBHSFan;1809291 wrote:Ptown, can you shed some light on this?

    http://www.reuters.com/article/us-iran-nuclear-exemptions-exclusive-idUSKCN1173LA
    I'll get this.

    1. This is what we do to get a deal done.
    2. You don't know, you weren't there.
    3. Something, something news source.
    4. We owed them because of money we took 40 years ago
    5. You don't have any experience in these matters and are therefore inferior to me.
  • QuakerOats
    ^^^ reps