Disgusted with obama administration - Part II
-
isadoreDisgusted with Obama disgusted with Obama disgusted with Obama
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ echoing to the true believers.
-
gutYes...Obamaconomy going strong. 4 more years....CAN'T WAIT!!!!
-
QuakerOatshttp://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/11/21/Surprise-PA-College-Slashes-Hours-To-Avoid-Obamacare
Once again, liberalism generates the exact opposite of its stated intent.
Change we can believe in... -
isadore
gosh a ruddies, it is deja vu. I have the strange feeling I just read the exact same thing on another thread, wow.QuakerOats;1327190 wrote:http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/11/21/Surprise-PA-College-Slashes-Hours-To-Avoid-Obamacare
Once again, liberalism generates the exact opposite of its stated intent.
Change we can believe in... -
supermanI, for one, appreciate Obama. I just bought a house for 168,000 that the old owner paid 205,000 for about 4 years ago. Thanks Barry.
-
superman
It's a long term investment.ccrunner609;1327383 wrote:but the problem is that it will be worth 148,000 when he is done -
James GatzQuaker, you are continuing to welch on the bet you agreed to. What's the deal?
-
QuakerOats
Hello Jim,James Gatz;1327489 wrote:Quaker, you are continuing to welch on the bet you agreed to. What's the deal?
Do I have a bet with you?
Please advise.
'Oats -
James Gatz
.........QuakerOats;1327514 wrote:Hello Jim,
Do I have a bet with you?
Please advise.
'Oats
2kool4skool;1275196 wrote:I will make a wager with you. If Romney wins, I will PayPal you 1,000 USD. If Obama wins, you get a vasectomy so you can never reproduce again.QuakerOats;1275215 wrote:Deal. -
QuakerOatsThanks Jim, not to worry, I don't make babies I cannot afford to take care of, thereby placing undue burden on you and others. In fact, I am subsidizing others who do partake in such activity because liberals like the ones on here advocate the confiscation of a large portion of my productive labor in order to promote such behavior. I think it is part of obama's fundamental transformation of AmeriKa -- isn't it great?
-
Devils Advocate
:thumbup:QuakerOats;1275130 wrote:It is over ......... for obama. He was going to lose anyway, but sealed it with his "You didn't build it" quip. It is quite telling that in highly scientific polling in Ohio's 6th district, a poor district, if you will, obama is getting his arse kicked by very signficiant magins. Given that, there is simply no way he can win. He has lost votes from every single demographic.
But hey, believe what you want.
I believe you are a welcher and an idiot. Pay up, or shut up. -
believer
Pretty much what the Feds will be telling us in January.Devils Advocate;1329672 wrote::thumbup:
I believe you are a welcher and an idiot. Pay up, or shut up. -
Devils Advocate
Naw... They'll just print more money.believer;1329798 wrote:Pretty much what the Feds will be telling us in January.
-
believer
True. Fire up the presses. Time for some quantitative easing.Devils Advocate;1329802 wrote:Naw... They'll just print more money. -
QuakerOats[h=3]Study: EPA Regulations To Cost Pennsylvania Manufacturers $1.5 Billion.[/h]Lehigh Valley Business (11/29, Pedersen) reported, "The Northeast PA Manufacturers & Employers Association of Pottsville and the National Association of Manufacturers released a new study by the advisory firm ndp|consulting on Nov. 28 which examines the impact of several Environmental Protection Agency regulations on Pennsylvania's economy." The "study finds that the annual compliance costs of the EPA's proposed Utility Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT), Boiler Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) and Coal Combustion Residuals regulations on Pennsylvania will be $1.5 billion." The "impact of EPA's Utility MACT, Boiler MACT and Coal Combustion Residuals regulations on Pennsylvania, include: annual compliance costs: $1.5 billion; annual manufacturing sector compliance costs: $651.6 million; total upfront capital expenditures to comply: $8.9 billion;" and total "manufacturing sector upfront capital expenditures: $3.7 billion." According to the study, "the cumulative impact of the EPA's proposed regulations nationwide could cost roughly $100 billion annually and more than 2 million jobs."
Change we can believe in .... -
QuakerOatsToday's selected headlines:
White House opposed new Iran sanctions...
STUDY: American Households Hit 43-Year Low In Net Worth...
Debt Hits $16,306,713,000,000...
ANGRY SANDY VICTIMS SLAM FEMA...
Feds spend $100k teaching teen girls 'condom negotiation'...
UPDATE: EGYPT ISLAMISTS HURRIEDLY APPROVE NEW CONSTITUTION...
Liberals, leftists, Christians, moderate Muslims withdrew before vote...
Retains Islamic law as main source of legislation...
No equal rights for women; owning slaves not banned... -
isadoreselected headline
Obama wins second term, Fox News projects
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/11/06/obama-romney-wind-down-campaigns-as-voters-make-their-choice/ -
ptown_trojans_1
If it helps keep the air clean, I am fine with it.QuakerOats;1333620 wrote:Study: EPA Regulations To Cost Pennsylvania Manufacturers $1.5 Billion.
Lehigh Valley Business (11/29, Pedersen) reported, "The Northeast PA Manufacturers & Employers Association of Pottsville and the National Association of Manufacturers released a new study by the advisory firm ndp|consulting on Nov. 28 which examines the impact of several Environmental Protection Agency regulations on Pennsylvania's economy." The "study finds that the annual compliance costs of the EPA's proposed Utility Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT), Boiler Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) and Coal Combustion Residuals regulations on Pennsylvania will be $1.5 billion." The "impact of EPA's Utility MACT, Boiler MACT and Coal Combustion Residuals regulations on Pennsylvania, include: annual compliance costs: $1.5 billion; annual manufacturing sector compliance costs: $651.6 million; total upfront capital expenditures to comply: $8.9 billion;" and total "manufacturing sector upfront capital expenditures: $3.7 billion." According to the study, "the cumulative impact of the EPA's proposed regulations nationwide could cost roughly $100 billion annually and more than 2 million jobs."
Change we can believe in .... -
believer
Translates to: As long as it doesn't impact my checkbook, I'm fine with it.ptown_trojans_1;1333994 wrote:If it helps keep the air clean, I am fine with it. -
ptown_trojans_1
I'd gladly pay a little more to help keep the air clean.believer;1334011 wrote:Translates to: As long as it doesn't impact my checkbook, I'm fine with it.
Sorry, I do not want to have air like China. -
isadorebreathing is terribly overrated.
-
believer
You apparently just want the Chinese to have the jobs.ptown_trojans_1;1334042 wrote:I'd gladly pay a little more to help keep the air clean.
Sorry, I do not want to have air like China.
Seriously, the environmental laws already in place in this country are more than sufficient to keep us from having "air like China." Why does the EPA keep piling on over-regulation to the very industries that keep what's left of our economy humming?
It's amazing how all of you well-paid with cushy bennies Beltway boyz are all about the chicken little nonsense just as long as you get to keep your taxpayer-based jobs. :rolleyes: -
QuakerOats
Hilarious. I suppose if it saves one life we shouldn't drive cars.ptown_trojans_1;1333994 wrote:If it helps keep the air clean, I am fine with it.
You have truly drank the k-aid -
gut
If the unemployment benefits aren't extended there's going to be a lot of Obama voters wondering WTF happened to Santa.