Vice Presidential Debate
-
HitsRus
Great analysis. That seemed to be the strategy....just keep interrupting and being a clown so the viewer couldn't concentrate on what Ryan was saying. I'm not sure that it is going to sit well with people who were watching and are trying to make up their mind.the "tie-up" tactic was effective at preventing his opponent from just pummeling him. Distract, get personal and don't let it be about facts. The base probably loved that performance, but it won't fly with educated voters. Campaign has officially gone full-retard.
Absolutely terrible moderator who tolerated that....Ryan made one statement against the constant interruptions, but with the moderator unwilling /unable to do her job, he should have made a second and more forceful comment about the utter rudeness of his opponent.
Perhaps she was just intimidated by the office. I suppose it is hard to say...."Mr. Vice President, STFU." -
se-alum
Barack Obama was a guest at Martha Raddatz wedding. I fully expected her to lean toward Biden, and she did. She seemed to try to bait and question Ryan much more than she did Biden. She did get testy with the Joe-ker on a couple occasions though.HitsRus;1293416 wrote:Great analysis. That seemed to be the strategy....just keep interrupting and being a clown so the viewer couldn't concentrate on what Ryan was saying. I'm not sure that it is going to sit well with people who were watching and are trying to make up their mind.
Absolutely terrible moderator who tolerated that....Ryan made one statement against the constant interruptions, but with the moderator unwilling /unable to do her job, he should have made a second and more forceful comment about the utter rudeness of his opponent.
Perhaps she was just intimidated by the office. I suppose it is hard to say...."Mr. Vice President, STFU." -
ts1227HitsRus;1293416 wrote:Great analysis. That seemed to be the strategy....just keep interrupting and being a clown so the viewer couldn't concentrate on what Ryan was saying. I'm not sure that it is going to sit well with people who were watching and are trying to make up their mind.
Absolutely terrible moderator who tolerated that....Ryan made one statement against the constant interruptions, but with the moderator unwilling /unable to do her job, he should have made a second and more forceful comment about the utter rudeness of his opponent.
Perhaps she was just intimidated by the office. I suppose it is hard to say...."Mr. Vice President, STFU."
On the moderation, she did a decent job keeping it on track. I think she was correct in not interjecting immediately during the interruptions because it allowed Ryan to keep making his point and just talk right through it. Had she cut it off mid sentence she would have likely further interfered with Ryan's delivery of his points. -
sleeper
It was even funnier because Biden had more speaking time than Ryan; even if you don't include the interruptions.gut;1293353 wrote:Ryan did absolutely hit the nail on the head at the end: "With Obama, we get speeches. We need leadership".
and lmfao, how many times did Biden have to interrupt with "hope I get equal time"? That really did make him look like a moron, of course I suspect he actually is. But it was like his pre-programmed go-to distraction.
All this debate did for me was make me HATE Joe Biden and if Obama is re-elected, I want the secret service to quadruple the protection on Obama. Also have 10 doctors checking up on Obama everyday. -
sleeper
This. You could tell the moderator had an agenda.se-alum;1293421 wrote:Barack Obama was a guest at Martha Raddatz wedding. I fully expected her to lean toward Biden, and she did. She seemed to try to bait and question Ryan much more than she did Biden. She did get testy with the Joe-ker on a couple occasions though. -
HitsRus
Disagree completely. She allowed Biden to talk over top of Ryan such that it was an audio distraction from what he was trying to say. WTF is the moderator's job?I think she was correct in not interjecting immediately during the interruptions because it allowed Ryan to keep making his point and just talk right through it. -
ts1227HitsRus;1293435 wrote:Disagree completely. She allowed Biden to talk over top of Ryan such that it was an audio distraction from what he was trying to say. WTF is the moderator's job?
It was an audio distraction to those of us watching, but I think she would have completely derailed Ryan if she immediately cut him off to yell at Biden all night. Ryan handled it well and was able to continue his points. I know if I'm talking to someone and they interject I would rather just keep going while I have that thought in my head
I mean, compared to Lehrer she did a damn good job, lol. -
gut
Fully agree. We've finally found someone that makes Obama look good in comparison.sleeper;1293433 wrote: All this debate did for me was make me HATE Joe Biden and if Obama is re-elected, I want the secret service to quadruple the protection on Obama. Also have 10 doctors checking up on Obama everyday. -
gport_tennisWhen she asked ryan "do you actually have any specifics our are your still working on those?" I thought that was completely uncalled for from Her. Her tone was extremely sarcastic as well at that time. she never did or said anything close to Biden like that the whole night
-
sleeper
I'm not sure what specifics she'd like Ryan to talk about. He's already given his plan, which is more than the D's have given, what specifics is she looking for?gport_tennis;1293440 wrote:When she asked ryan "do you actually have any specifics our are your still working on those?" I thought that was completely uncalled for from Her. Her tone was extremely sarcastic as well at that time. she never did or said anything close to Biden like that the whole night
"Well, we are going to work with Congress to get these bills passed" ? -
se-alum
Any intelligent person knows that neither side can possibly divulge specifics about a plan. You can lay out a foundation on what you want to happen, but if you get technical, people are going to expect exactly that, which isn't possible in the politics realm.sleeper;1293445 wrote:I'm not sure what specifics she'd like Ryan to talk about. He's already given his plan, which is more than the D's have given, what specifics is she looking for?
"Well, we are going to work with Congress to get these bills passed" ? -
sleeper
I agree. I just think its beyond stupid to keep hammering these "specifics". I agree with what Ryan said, you set a framework and work to achieve that through the process. The R's have set the framework, what framework have the D's set?se-alum;1293450 wrote:Any intelligent person knows that neither side can possibly divulge specifics about a plan. You can lay out a foundation on what you want to happen, but if you get technical, people are going to expect exactly that, which isn't possible in the politics realm. -
like_thatGotta love how people now cry for specifics from Romney/Ryan, when the same people 4 years ago were fine with "hope" and "change." What a joke.
-
fan_from_texasI thought the moderator did a nice job, on the whole. It's clear Biden prepped to be on the offensive, but guaging by reaction polls, it apears he came off as too smug/condescending. Ryan didn't screw anything up, but he didn't hit a HR, either. Like I said, if you're polling partisans, I suspect Biden came out on top by a bit. If you're polling independents, I think Ryan probably came out on top. Either way, it was an interesting/entertaining debate to watch.
-
jhay78Even MSNBC called out Biden for the "didn't know about needing more security in Libya" whopper:
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2012/10/11/Biden-Lies-In-debate-about-security-requests -
se-alum
IMO, that was easily the biggest gaffe of the debate. Did Biden not realize how bad it sounded when he said, "the President and I didn't know we needed more security". It was the anniversary of 9/11, in a country known for terrorist cells. They didn't need someone to tell them, they should've known.jhay78;1293538 wrote:Even MSNBC called out Biden for the "didn't know about needing more security in Libya" whopper:
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2012/10/11/Biden-Lies-In-debate-about-security-requests -
Bigdogg
Sleeper, I think it is important that you clarify just excatly what you mean by your statement. I think I know what you mean, but I really want you to explain just excatly what you mean. Be VERY carefull.sleeper;1293433 wrote:All this debate did for me was make me HATE Joe Biden and if Obama is re-elected, I want the secret service to quadruple the protection on Obama. Also have 10 doctors checking up on Obama everyday. -
se-alum
His statement is very clear. This country immediately becomes the World's whipping boy if Biden is ever President.Bigdogg;1293616 wrote:Sleeper, I think it is important that you clarify just excatly what you mean by your statement. I think I know what you mean, but I really want you to explain just excatly what you mean. Be VERY carefull. -
sleeperBigdogg;1293616 wrote:Sleeper, I think it is important that you clarify just excatly what you mean by your statement. I think I know what you mean, but I really want you to explain just excatly what you mean. Be VERY carefull.
-
FatHobbitI think Bigdogg thought sleeper was threatening Obama, when he was really hoping that nothing happened to Obama so Biden doesn't become president.
-
TedSheckler
Who do you think you are? Why should he have to explain it to YOU?Bigdogg;1293616 wrote:Sleeper, I think it is important that you clarify just excatly what you mean by your statement. I think I know what you mean, but I really want you to explain just excatly what you mean. Be VERY carefull. -
jhay78
Biden also pretended like he didn't vote for both wars in Iraq and Afghanistan:se-alum;1293602 wrote:IMO, that was easily the biggest gaffe of the debate. Did Biden not realize how bad it sounded when he said, "the President and I didn't know we needed more security". It was the anniversary of 9/11, in a country known for terrorist cells. They didn't need someone to tell them, they should've known.
[INDENT]And, by the way, they talk about this Great Recession if it fell out of the sky, like, “Oh, my goodness, where did it come from?” It came from this man voting to put two wars on a credit card, to at the same time put a prescription drug benefit on the credit card, a trillion-dollar tax cut for the very wealthy. I was there. I voted against them. I said, no, we can’t afford that.
[/INDENT] -
believer
-
jmog
I think it was quite obvious from what we know now that this was a complete and out right lie.se-alum;1293602 wrote:IMO, that was easily the biggest gaffe of the debate. Did Biden not realize how bad it sounded when he said, "the President and I didn't know we needed more security". It was the anniversary of 9/11, in a country known for terrorist cells. They didn't need someone to tell them, they should've known. -
jmog
Which he 100% did vote for them...if only Ryan had called him out on that vote.jhay78;1293636 wrote:Biden also pretended like he didn't vote for both wars in Iraq and Afghanistan: