kizer permanente
Senior Member
1,309
posts
Joined
Aug 2017
kizer permanente
Senior Member
Tue, Dec 21, 2021 1:44 PM
posted by jmog
So now your argument is that the people polled are lying?
I mean that’s an interesting way to say “I was wrong so I will change my argument”.
Well if they aren’t lying,then they’re just pretty stupid, huh?
queencitybuckeye
Senior Member
8,068
posts
Joined
Nov 2009
queencitybuckeye
Senior Member
Wed, Dec 22, 2021 7:19 AM
posted by kizer permanente
Well if they aren’t lying,then they’re just pretty stupid, huh?
What's stupid about the argument that the cost of living, already high, keeps rising to the point where one can't afford it anymore or decide it's no longer worth it?
queencitybuckeye
Senior Member
8,068
posts
Joined
Nov 2009
queencitybuckeye
Senior Member
Wed, Dec 22, 2021 7:21 AM
posted by gut
LMFAO....what thread did you post this in again?
Not only that, since when is tax policy not political?
kizer permanente
Senior Member
1,309
posts
Joined
Aug 2017
kizer permanente
Senior Member
Wed, Dec 22, 2021 9:39 AM
posted by queencitybuckeye
What's stupid about the argument that the cost of living, already high, keeps rising to the point where one can't afford it anymore or decide it's no longer worth it?
That’s not stupid. What’s stupid is moving to an area with an already high income tax rate then leaving and saying it’s because the income tax rate is too high.
kizer permanente
Senior Member
1,309
posts
Joined
Aug 2017
kizer permanente
Senior Member
Wed, Dec 22, 2021 9:41 AM
posted by gut
LMFAO....what thread did you post this in again?
The thread it’s posted on is moot. The point remains cost of living in desirable areas isn’t political. I’m not sure exactly what you’re missing?
queencitybuckeye
Senior Member
8,068
posts
Joined
Nov 2009
queencitybuckeye
Senior Member
Wed, Dec 22, 2021 10:00 AM
posted by kizer permanente
The thread it’s posted on is moot. The point remains cost of living in desirable areas isn’t political. I’m not sure exactly what you’re missing?
As the tax burden between various states is a huge factor in the cost of living, of course it's political.
kizer permanente
Senior Member
1,309
posts
Joined
Aug 2017
kizer permanente
Senior Member
Wed, Dec 22, 2021 10:53 AM
posted by queencitybuckeye
As the tax burden between various states is a huge factor in the cost of living, of course it's political.
Sure, But when you look at the most desirable areas to live in, they tend to lean blue to purple. You don't think that skews it?
queencitybuckeye
Senior Member
8,068
posts
Joined
Nov 2009
queencitybuckeye
Senior Member
Wed, Dec 22, 2021 11:03 AM
posted by kizer permanente
Sure, But when you look at the most desirable areas to live in, they tend to lean blue to purple. You don't think that skews it?
Not sure your premise is accurate.
kizer permanente
Senior Member
1,309
posts
Joined
Aug 2017
kizer permanente
Senior Member
Wed, Dec 22, 2021 11:53 AM
posted by Fletch
Moderate Dems leaving in droves. Gonna be a bloodbath next year
The bloodbath is happening as we speak in the ICUs and they’re not typically democrats.
kizer permanente
Senior Member
1,309
posts
Joined
Aug 2017
kizer permanente
Senior Member
Wed, Dec 22, 2021 12:19 PM
posted by queencitybuckeye
Not sure your premise is accurate.
I don't know. I know there's no perfect way to figure out metrics on a relatively subjective position, but when you look at top ten areas where real estate costs the most, it's overwhelmingly democrat.
1. San Francisco, California 85.3% Democrat
2. Manhattan, New York 86.4% Democrat
3. San Jose, California 72.6% Democrat
4. Bethesda, Maryland 78.6% Democrat
5. Brooklyn, New York 76.8% Democrat
6. Los Angeles, California 71.0% Democrat
7. Boston, Massachusetts 80.6% Democrat
8. Oakland, California 79.8% Democrat
9. Seattle, Washington 75.0% Democrat
10. Honolulu, Hawaii 62.5% Democrat
kizer permanente
Senior Member
1,309
posts
Joined
Aug 2017
kizer permanente
Senior Member
Wed, Dec 22, 2021 12:55 PM
posted by Fletch
Link? Also wrong thread.
Not that you’ll read it, but …
like_that
1st Team All-PWN
29,228
posts
Joined
Apr 2010
like_that
1st Team All-PWN
Wed, Dec 22, 2021 1:06 PM
posted by kizer permanente
I don't know. I know there's no perfect way to figure out metrics on a relatively subjective position, but when you look at top ten areas where real estate costs the most, it's overwhelmingly democrat.
1. San Francisco, California 85.3% Democrat
2. Manhattan, New York 86.4% Democrat
3. San Jose, California 72.6% Democrat
4. Bethesda, Maryland 78.6% Democrat
5. Brooklyn, New York 76.8% Democrat
6. Los Angeles, California 71.0% Democrat
7. Boston, Massachusetts 80.6% Democrat
8. Oakland, California 79.8% Democrat
9. Seattle, Washington 75.0% Democrat
10. Honolulu, Hawaii 62.5% Democrat
Now do top in bound states and their associated political colors….
kizer permanente
Senior Member
1,309
posts
Joined
Aug 2017
kizer permanente
Senior Member
Wed, Dec 22, 2021 1:07 PM
posted by like_that
Now do top in bound states and their associated political colors….
You don’t have google?
Also, I did cities not states. There’s probably at least one city in every state you could manage to live in. The whole state? Nah.
Also, those areas didn’t become undesirable or real estate would correlate, right?
kizer permanente
Senior Member
1,309
posts
Joined
Aug 2017
kizer permanente
Senior Member
Wed, Dec 22, 2021 1:13 PM
posted by Fletch
Lol if you think that is real
Well, feel free to refute it with your data then. That’s how that works lol.
I know they don’t teach that in gym class though.
kizer permanente
Senior Member
1,309
posts
Joined
Aug 2017
kizer permanente
Senior Member
Wed, Dec 22, 2021 1:21 PM
posted by gut
I wonder if the so-called "desirable" cities aren't overwhelmingly Democrat because of all the low-paying service jobs supporting the tourists and rich people.
The rich guy might vote Republican, but his maid, nanny, yard guys and his Starbucks barista vote Democrat. And so do the teachers that teach all their kids.
Maybe? No clue
Only one I'm any familiar with is Bethesda as I have family there, and it's not a very touristy place. So I would doubt that's the case there.
like_that
1st Team All-PWN
29,228
posts
Joined
Apr 2010
like_that
1st Team All-PWN
Wed, Dec 22, 2021 1:21 PM
posted by kizer permanente
You don’t have google?
Also, I did cities not states. There’s probably at least one city in every state you could manage to live in. The whole state? Nah.
Also, those areas didn’t become undesirable or real estate would correlate, right?
I’m making a point. You’re trying to have your cake and eat it too with your argument. You’re down playing policy (I.e making places more expensive) for the reason people are leaving, yet you conveniently leave out the fact why people are entering red states (hint: policy). A lot of these “blue/purple” states and cities getting new residents were once red. No one is denying your argument about supply/demand. You’re just being challenged on your straight denial of how policy has contributed to these outcomes.
I go back to my first comment. I can’t tell if you actually think this argument is as strong as your argument about crime or you’re just playing devils advocate, because this site is too conservative for your tastes.
kizer permanente
Senior Member
1,309
posts
Joined
Aug 2017
kizer permanente
Senior Member
Wed, Dec 22, 2021 1:30 PM
posted by like_that
I’m making a point. You’re trying to have your cake and eat it too with your argument. You’re down playing policy (I.e making places more expensive) for the reason people are leaving, yet you conveniently leave out the fact why people are entering red states (hint: policy). A lot of these “blue/purple” states and cities getting new residents were once red. No one is denying your argument about supply/demand. You’re just being challenged on your straight denial of how policy has contributed to these outcomes.
I go back to my first comment. I can’t tell if you actually think this argument is as strong as your argument about crime or you’re just playing devils advocate, because this site is too conservative for your tastes.
I’m not saying you’re wrong. I’m saying it’s too nuanced to say. “Look look look ! People are leaving California bc of the liberals” or “hey guyz democrats are why these big cities aren’t safe!!!” which you know the two who shared the links believes. You just happened to respond so I assume you agree with them?