posted by QuakerOatsI believe the lady admitted altering the yearbook, correct?
She just added the date under the signature. The signature and the message itself were not altered.
Also, she is the 2nd accuser and is no way affilated to the Post story that had a ton of sources and is widely regarded to be true.
posted by QuakerOatsI believe the lady admitted altering the yearbook, correct?
Lol. She admitted adding the date and location (which were clearly in different handwriting than the incryption and signature).
Fox put up a story claiming forgery.
Fox walked it back to say she added to it, removing any claims of forgery.
To say anything else is a weak attempt of disingenuity showing your blind partisanship.
Gotcha. She altered the document, after the fact, then had to admit same. Is that correct? As for Fox, if they corrected a story, good for them.
And here we go again with CNN this morning: terrorist act in NYC subway system, and they are talking about how many diet cokes Trump swigs in a day. Hilarious.
posted by QuakerOatsGotcha. She altered the document, after the fact, then had to admit same. Is that correct? As for Fox, if they corrected a story, good for them.
And here we go again with CNN this morning: terrorist act in NYC subway system, and they are talking about how many diet cokes Trump swigs in a day. Hilarious.
Yep, good for them in walking their deceiving story back; just like good for CNN in walking back the one you posted earlier. Two sides of the same coin!
Here's my opinion: I think it is impossible for any news organization not to make a mistake upon some occasions. But in today's climate, when they are trying to be first on rumors, this is when they look bad, for real. And then for it to happen so many times in one week - that just makes you look like a bunch of idiots.
It is much worse than trying to be 'first on rumors'. There are at least 5 major networks that are doing nothing more than planning, plotting, and purposefully airing stories that they can twist and turn to be negative against Trump. At the same time, they are further deceiving viewers by never reporting stories that could be viewed as favorabel to Trump. They are not even trying to hide their radical bias, and outright hatred for the guy. All you have to do is sit back and pretend if the events of the day were the same, but obama was president, what would they be reporting, and how would the reports be portrayed. It is simply shameful what is occurring; there has never been a greater example of 'the ends justifying the means'.
It is so easy to get information outside of the CNN/MSNBC world that you always complain about QO. This isn't like Pravda in the USSR days. You keep harping on your opinion that these networks will stop at nothing to bring down Trump. Well then don't watch. Get your news at one of the other millions of sources available in this day-in-age. People are a lot smarter than you seem to give them credit for. In general, they will figure out if a media outlet is not worth their time and then move on to something else that is.
I will be happily casting my vote for Doug Evans tomorrow in the AL senate race. He's a good man who I have been excited to vote for long before Moore's weirdo past came to light. That Moore played around with little girls isn't the main thing that bothers me about him. That he believes his brand of politics is ordained by God above others is what I detest about him. He's got a lot of blind followers down here who would vote for him no matter what. But I think Doug Jones has a real chance. It would be great for Alabama.
Who is Doug Evans?
posted by queencitybuckeyeWho is Doug Evans?
A guy who exposed Winston as a liar.
posted by queencitybuckeyeWho is Doug Evans?
He's the guy running against Roy Moore in the Alabama senate election
posted by Dr Winston O'BoogieIt is so easy to get information outside of the CNN/MSNBC world that you always complain about QO. This isn't like Pravda in the USSR days. You keep harping on your opinion that these networks will stop at nothing to bring down Trump. Well then don't watch. Get your news at one of the other millions of sources available in this day-in-age. People are a lot smarter than you seem to give them credit for. In general, they will figure out if a media outlet is not worth their time and then move on to something else that is.
No kidding. The point was the major left-wing media that dominates 80% of all media is simply working overtime to bring down Trump. But you knew that.
posted by Dr Winston O'BoogieHe's the guy running against Roy Moore in the Alabama senate election
Fairly certain its hilarious that you are voting for a guy that you don't even know his name.
The guy running against Roy Moore is Doug Jones, not Doug Evans.
posted by Dr Winston O'BoogieHe's the guy running against Roy Moore in the Alabama senate election
LOL.
Come on dude.
posted by Dr Winston O'BoogieHe's the guy running against Roy Moore in the Alabama senate election
So you're super excited to vote for a guy, and you don't even know his name?
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/democrats-rally-behind-roy-moore-opponent-doug-jones-alabama/
posted by Dr Winston O'BoogieI will be happily casting my vote for Doug Evans tomorrow in the AL senate race. He's a good man who I have been excited to vote for long before Moore's weirdo past came to light. That Moore played around with little girls isn't the main thing that bothers me about him. That he believes his brand of politics is ordained by God above others is what I detest about him. He's got a lot of blind followers down here who would vote for him no matter what. But I think Doug Jones has a real chance. It would be great for Alabama.
Make Alabama Great Again?
posted by QuakerOats
No kidding. The point was the major left-wing media that dominates 80% of all media is simply working overtime to bring down Trump. But you knew that.
Which, as a point, is all well and good, but coming from you and your love of Fox News links, as well as right-wing blogs, is somewhat diluted, since your sources tend to be at least as dishonest as those media sources, if not more in some cases.
posted by QuakerOatshttps://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/dec/11/big-medias-sad-and-extremely-horrible-week/
https://nypost.com/2017/12/11/the-new-media-standard-too-anti-trump-to-check/
You should at least post some sort of comment on the article when you link to something. This isn't the Drudge Report.
Doug Jones - I know his name. Just a brain glitch when I first typed it. You guys pointed it out and rightly so.
posted by justincredibleYou should at least post some sort of comment on the article when you link to something. This isn't the Drudge Report.
or the creepy admin from the defunct $12 site.
posted by queencitybuckeyeor the creepy admin from the defunct $12 site.
Which one?
posted by justincredibleWhich one?
In this case, alwaysafan. He was always dropping links with no comment.
posted by queencitybuckeyeIn this case, alwaysafan. He was always dropping links with no comment.
Ah, forgot about that guy.
posted by justincredibleAh, forgot about that guy.
Part of the three man circle jerk with JJ and that Buckeye Bill creep.