gut
Senior Member
gut
Senior Member
posted by majorsparkJust a proposal but it seeks to use a tax "loophole" which the left supposedly hates.
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/editorials/la-ed-salt-tax-gimmick-20180106-story.html
Hypocrisy aside, that's pretty brilliant (although unlikely to fly because qualified charitable contributions isn't exactly a loophole that has escaped scrutiny for decades). Probably a loser, but I like the idea.
But I think the argument is a lot more complicated (and a windfall for partisan airbags). I thought my taxes would increase, too, but turns out I get a decent cut because of changes to the AMT. Most of the people with high itemized deductions relative to income will actually be paying less because of those changes to AMT.
CA and NY, in particular, may be at risk because SALT is so high. But a rich guy in Columbus is paying 6% income tax, and probably another $15k or more in property taxes....if he makes $1M, it's like $70k in Columbus vs. $140k in CA....which the net federal tax deduction benefit would have been less than $25k. No idea what those AMT estimates are, but safe to say a good bit less than $25k. Maybe that causes a few rich people to bail on CA, but unlikely because we're talking, at worst, $10-$20k for someone making $1M.
Just too funny to see a small tax increase on the 1% draw so much ire and resistance.