Ohio Chatter DEV

SportsAndLady

I really hate when I say something on here, and then Classy says almost the exact same thing.

Really makes me question my existence.

Commander of Awesome

SportsAndLady;1832042 wrote:It was also his rookie year.

I'd trade our entire trash roster for Carson Wentz.

Same for Kessler, who had a better statistical season (8 game comparison). Dont see you beating the drum to keep him as QB going forward.

SportsAndLady

Commander of Awesome;1832053 wrote:Same for Kessler, who had a better statistical season (8 game comparison). Dont see you beating the drum to keep him as QB going forward.

Would love to keep Kessler, he'd make a great NFL backup for 10 years!

Commander of Awesome

SportsAndLady;1832054 wrote:Would love to keep Kessler, he'd make a great NFL backup for 10 years!

lol

like_that

Classyposter58;1832048 wrote:Browns fans are so unbelievably dumb and this thread shows it. You. Need. A. Quarterback.

Cleveland in that division will never make the playoffs until it gets one. Look at Oakland, they get David Carr and the turnaround happened fast. Denver has pretty much everything back from a SB team yet because they had no QB they miss the postseason entirely

You need a QB in the NFL?!?!?!

imex99

So, do they take Watson?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Commander of Awesome

imex99;1832151 wrote:So, do they take Watson?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Hope not.

Does this mean that Clemson could beat the Browns? lolololol

vball10set

imex99;1832151 wrote:So, do they take Watson?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I'd take Kizer over Watson--just seems to have more of an upside

SportsAndLady

No thanks on Watson

Benny The Jet

SportsAndLady;1832183 wrote:No thanks on Watson

This. The Watson you saw in the first half will most likely be the Watson you'll see in the NFL. Missing open open receivers and looking flustered.

Crimson streak

Watson was god awful against the blitz and always has been. his receivers bailed him out a lot the last 2 drives. No thanks. That's exactly why I'm high on Kizer. He has very good numbers against the blitz

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Crimson streak

I'm actually hoping some dumbass team like the jets or niners take Watson in the top 5 and Kizer or trubisky falls in our lap at 12

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

iclfan2

Don't like Watson's size. Do not want.

Laley23

Watson would be the pick if he comes with a side of Mike Williams and Everette to catch all his awful throws. He had like 5 on target throws all night.

Great college QB though

Commander of Awesome

Laley23;1832193 wrote:Watson would be the pick if he comes with a side of Mike Williams and Everette to catch all his awful throws. He had like 5 on target throws all night.

This, never impressed with him. Not to go all sleeper here, but I wouldn't take him in the 3rd round.

vball10set

Laley23;1832193 wrote:Watson would be the pick if he comes with a side of Mike Williams and Everette to catch all his awful throws. He had like 5 on target throws all night.

Great college QB though

This is eerily similar to what I said when the Browns selected Manziel..."is Mike Evans coming with him?"

vball10set

SportsAndLady;1832183 wrote:No thanks on Watson

Benny The Jet;1832187 wrote:This. The Watson you saw in the first half will most likely be the Watson you'll see in the NFL. Missing open open receivers and looking flustered.

Crimson streak;1832189 wrote:Watson was god awful against the blitz and always has been. his receivers bailed him out a lot the last 2 drives. No thanks. That's exactly why I'm high on Kizer. He has very good numbers against the blitz

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Crimson streak;1832191 wrote:I'm actually hoping some dumbass team like the jets or niners take Watson in the top 5 and Kizer or trubisky falls in our lap at 12

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

iclfan2;1832192 wrote:Don't like Watson's size. Do not want.

Laley23;1832193 wrote:Watson would be the pick if he comes with a side of Mike Williams and Everette to catch all his awful throws. He had like 5 on target throws all night.

Great college QB though

Commander of Awesome;1832212 wrote:This, never impressed with him. Not to go all sleeper here, but I wouldn't take him in the 3rd round.

these

Ironman92

Watson's beat feature is his grit and toughness.....he'll probably last longer and be better than we expect....but he won't be a very good QB for long, if any. Great college QB

Commander of Awesome

Buddy just sent me this, it brings teh lulz

[video=youtube;f2GMcjNyAyI][/video]

#CroKno U A Bitch lol

Crimson streak

Commander of Awesome;1832254 wrote:Buddy just sent me this, it brings teh lulz

[video=youtube;f2GMcjNyAyI][/video]

#CroKno U A Bitch lol

I forgot about that video, shit kills me every time lol

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

slingshot4ever

Give me the UNC QB

Benny The Jet

slingshot4ever;1832278 wrote:Give me the UNC QB

Drafted in the 20's/2nd round? Sure. Or were you wanting to spend the 1st or 12th on him?

Sonofanump

Benny The Jet;1832341 wrote:12th on him?

I'd be OK with that.

Benny The Jet

I really don't see 1 QB worth a 1st or 12th pick for. I'd solidify the lines first and foremost. You could put Rodgers behind our line and he'd look like crap. Just my opinion.

SportsAndLady

Benny The Jet;1832347 wrote:I really don't see 1 QB worth a 1st or 12th pick for. I'd solidify the lines first and foremost. You could put Rodgers behind our line and he'd look like crap. Just my opinion.

Hasn't Rodgers had a shitty line almost his entire career (outside of this year where they've been pretty good)? Including the year he won the super bowl?

That's a pretty asinine comment. If we get an elite QB, we don't NEED a Dallas Cowboys line to do well.

However, if we get a Dallas Cowboys line, we still need a decent QB to do well.

I'll take the QB at 1 or 12.

Archive

2016 Browns Season Thread