Archive

Will Brady be punished?

  • Footwedge
    wildcats20;1727151 wrote:It was no more than 2.
    .

    Obviously I meant 10% of pressure reduction, not 10 lbs.
  • Footwedge
    Azubuike24;1727212 wrote:Ruin his legacy? Haha.
    So says the guy who said Cardale Jones has abslolutely no chance of being an NFL quarterback. Stick to hoops.
  • sleeper
    wildcats20;1727152 wrote:There is no proof that Tom Brady cheated. The findings only state that he probably knew the balls were deflated. Good luck proving that.
    This is the problem with punishing Brady. There is no proof that he did anything wrong or requested the balls to be deflated. At best they can say Tom Brady complained about the balls being too highly inflated but that doesn't mean he requested them to be altered. I think it's a game maybe, but definitely a fine.
  • jmog
    ernest_t_bass;1727188 wrote:Yes... I know this. But just let all teams do whatever the fuck they want with the ball. If one way or the other creates and advantage, just let all teams do it. Who gives a shit?
    If that's the mantra, why make teams have 7 guys on the line? Why not let them lineup in any formation they want if it gives them an advantage? Why not let substitutes run on and off the field as late as they want as long as 11 guys are on the field when the ball is snapped, it is the defense's fault if they don't know who to guard and who is running off.

    For that matter, why just 11 guys? If 12 guys is an advantage, why not play more?

    I'm obviously taking your point to absurdum but you get the idea. There are rules for reasons, same with the range of pressure for the footballs.
  • thavoice
    jmog;1727180 wrote:If you've ever played football at a position that handles or kicks the ball, you'd know why air pressure in the ball is important (high or low depending on what you want/need) and why it can be an advantage.
    Yep. And that is why the kickers have special balls they use. They were manipulating their balls too much.

    As a former QB who was a few (thousands) notches below Brady I can tell ya...yeah, underinflating a little bit def helps holding onto the ball. I would say though that overinflating a ball sucks MORE than underinflating one helps..in my own opinion.
  • ernest_t_bass
    jmog;1727230 wrote:I'm obviously taking your point to absurdum
    Indeed you are.
    jmog;1727230 wrote:but you get the idea.
    No, I don't. See above.
  • BR1986FB
    "Ruin" his legacy? So I guess Brady has had balls deflated since his rookie season and in every Super Bowl/playoff game?
  • Tiernan
    I think both Brady & Belichek should be praised for pushing the limits of competition. They look for edges and capitalize on them...smart innovative SOBs. Ima huge fan.
  • Footwedge
    BR1986FB;1727251 wrote:"Ruin" his legacy? So I guess Brady has had balls deflated since his rookie season and in every Super Bowl/playoff game?

    It doesn't]t matter. He's one of the 5 best quarterbacks of all time...and he's a cheater. People that covertly cheat ruin their legacy. He will always be remembered as a guy who cheated to help win an AFC championship game. He denied knowing a thing about it because he didn't want to be forever labeled as a cheater. Well, BUSTED.

    Those that defend him on this thread are in the same moral class as him. Probably cheated on their girl friend. cheated on their college entrance exams, and definitely cheat on their income taxes.
  • Footwedge
    BR1986FB;1727251 wrote:"Ruin" his legacy? So I guess Brady has had balls deflated since his rookie season and in every Super Bowl/playoff game?
    It doesn't matter. He's one of the 5 best quarterbacks of all time...and he's a cheater. People that covertly cheat ruin their legacy. He will always be remembered as a guy who cheated to help win an AFC championship game. He denied knowing a thing about it because he didn't want to be forever labeled as a cheater. Well, BUSTED.

    Those that defend him on this thread are in the same moral class as him. Probably cheated on their girl friend, cheated on their college entrance exams, and definitely cheat on their income taxes.
  • BR1986FB
    Footwedge;1727266 wrote: Those that defend him on this thread are in the same moral class as him. Probably cheated on their girl friend, cheated on their college entrance exams, and definitely cheat on their income taxes.
    Who is defending him? Frankly, I think he's a pompous asshole who SHOULD be punished. But do I think it will "ruin" his legacy? No.
  • Laley23
    Footwedge;1727266 wrote:
    Those that defend him on this thread are in the same moral class as him. Probably cheated on their girl friend, cheated on their college entrance exams, and definitely cheat on their income taxes.
    Wait, there are people out there who DON'T cheat on their taxes???
  • rydawg5
    Is this as bad as corking a bat?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • thavoice
    Did it ruin Jerry Rice's legacy that he came out and said he cheated by putting stickum on his gloves?

    I think this is a way step down from corking a bad rydawg. When you cork a bat it supposedly will make the ball go further.,
  • Heretic
    thavoice;1727278 wrote:Did it ruin Jerry Rice's legacy that he came out and said he cheated by putting stickum on his gloves?

    I think this is a way step down from corking a bad rydawg. When you cork a bat it supposedly will make the ball go further.,
    And right up there with Ray Lewis and the deer antler stuff. Man, he survived murdering someone to stay in the league, but everyone shunned him and his reputation went to shit after those allegations came out.

    Oh wait...
  • thavoice
    Heretic;1727279 wrote:And right up there with Ray Lewis and the deer antler stuff. Man, he survived murdering someone to stay in the league, but everyone shunned him and his reputation went to shit after those allegations came out.

    Oh wait...
    Ha. Forgot about that deer antler stuff!
    that got pretty hot for awhile. I bet some people lost their asses though after that by trying to capitalize on it and the bubble seemed to burst!

    As for killing someone...I dont think Lewis did the killing...but someone in his crew did and he knew much more than what he let out.
  • jmog
    ernest_t_bass;1727241 wrote:Indeed you are.



    No, I don't. See above.
    Your premise is that if it gives anyone a competitive advantage then it should be allowed.

    I likened that to why not let offenses line up their 11 guys ANYWHERE they want? Why not let everyone be in motion when the ball is snapped? Why not let guys in motion be moving towards the LOS like in the Arena Football League?

    If any rule should be allowed if it gives some competitive advantage when why not take them all out of the rule book then?
  • wildcats20
    jmog;1727301 wrote:Your premise is that if it gives anyone a competitive advantage then it should be allowed.

    I likened that to why not let offenses line up their 11 guys ANYWHERE they want? Why not let everyone be in motion when the ball is snapped? Why not let guys in motion be moving towards the LOS like in the Arena Football League?

    If any rule should be allowed if it gives some competitive advantage when why not take them all out of the rule book then?
    The defense can line up wherever they want and have guys moving at all times. What an unfair advantage.
  • thavoice
    wildcats20;1727303 wrote:The defense can line up wherever they want and have guys moving at all times. What an unfair advantage.
    ...but then they can barely breathe on the receivers after 5 yards......
  • jmog
    wildcats20;1727303 wrote:The defense can line up wherever they want and have guys moving at all times. What an unfair advantage.
    If you want scores 85-70, allow offenses to have nearly no rules on where to lineup and motion rules, like the AFL.

    Playing defense in the NFL is 10x harder than offense for many reasons, one of which thevoice already mentioned.
  • Footwedge
    thavoice;1727278 wrote:Did it ruin Jerry Rice's legacy that he came out and said he cheated by putting stickum on his gloves?

    I think this is a way step down from corking a bad rydawg. When you cork a bat it supposedly will make the ball go further.,
    As opposed to deflating a football against the rules that make it infinitely easier to throw and catch it.
  • Footwedge
    BR1986FB;1727267 wrote:Who is defending him? Frankly, I think he's a pompous asshole who SHOULD be punished. But do I think it will "ruin" his legacy?

    No.
    Yeah...Pete Rose's legacy is in fine shape too.
  • thavoice
    Footwedge;1727321 wrote:As opposed to deflating a football against the rules that make it infinitely easier to throw and catch it.
    Adding that stickum to his gloves was considered illegal as well, and make it easier to catch the ball and then not fumble when running withthe ball.
  • WebFire
    Footwedge;1727323 wrote:Yeah...Pete Rose's legacy is in fine shape too.
    Taking some air out of a football is almost the same as betting on games.
  • Footwedge
    WebFire;1727358 wrote:Taking some air out of a football is almost the same as betting on games.
    You're right. Pete got screwed. didn't he? Pete never cheated when he played and yet he's banned for life. Makes no sense to me either. Good point!