2015 NFL Regular Season Chatter

• Sonofanump

  i can not see Weeden keeping the starting job once Cassel grasps the offense.
  
  
• Uz2Bon36

  

  SportsAndLady;1752533 wrote:He sucks. Admit you were wrong, Said.

  If you needed a QB for a football team, would you take Tebow over rg3?
  

  like_that;1752537 wrote:This, just stfu Said. You went all in on RG3, thought you were funny with your trolling, now you are a POS that can't admit you were wrong.

  A POS, OK. As in being wrong, you're wrong! RG3 can still be a good qb. Will he, is the question.
  
  You're an idiot if you disagree. He still has one of the best arms in the league. Like originally said, he sucks at reading defenses. Work on his fundamentals and he may still be good.
  
  btw- Joe Theismann, Rex Grossman and Chris Carter agree with me.....
• Sonofanump

  Uz2Bon36;1752569 wrote:btw- Joe Theismann, ....

  That is not a positive endorsement.
• Iliketurtles

  

  Uz2Bon36;1752530 wrote:Are you talking to fill an immediate hole in the lineup?
  imo- RG3 can still throw the ball pretty damn well. Yes, he sucks at reading defenses but can learn and get better.
  He's a project but still the tools are there.

  I'm just saying if they were going to bring someone in and the choice was between Tebow and RG3 I'd take Tebow. I think they both suck but at least I don't have to worry about Tebow getting injured.
  The best possible guy would have been Kyle Orton but that bridge was burned. As for Cassel I hate giving up a draft pick for him as I don't think he will overtake Weeden. I don't think Weeden will be anything great but I do believe he will be better than he was in Cleveland.
• Azubuike24

  

  If you already have a QB and are strictly going on value (and ignoring acquisition cost), it's RGIII and not close. The problem is, there are other barriers to getting RGIII. Tebow you could have for league minimum.
  
  It's a whole different world if you're bringing RGIII in to actually start and you're having to pay with picks/payroll to obtain him.
• Mulva

  

  Iliketurtles;1752586 wrote:I don't think Weeden will be anything great but I do believe he will be better than he was in Cleveland.

  I'm not sure a statement has ever left more middle ground.
• Azubuike24

  

  He going to be asked to run a team who will try to run the ball 75% of the time and run the play clock down on every play. I would agree, Dallas will not be as bad as people predict and they are still the favorites in a bad division, but man, they are going to play some boring ass games for the next 2 months.
• Heretic

  

  Mulva;1752640 wrote:I'm not sure a statement has ever left more middle ground.

  That's like being a student and saying, I don't think I got an A on the test, but I do believe I got at least 10% of the questions right.
• friendfromlowry

  Chancellor back with the Seahawks. Damn - I was hoping he'd wait until after the Bengals game.
• Azubuike24

  

  I think Dan Quinn leaving will keep the Seahawks D from ever being what it was. Good, yes. Good enough to be scared of them coming into Cincinnati? No way. Just look at Atlanta's defense and how it went from one of, if not the softest in the NFL, to actually looking decent (without a ton of talent).
• friendfromlowry

  ^^Definitely agree. He's a freak regardless of his coach though. Actually one of my favorite players to watch.
• Azubuike24

  

  On another note, over/under on how many rounds Pacman Jones and Steve Smith go this Sunday? Two of the biggest trash talkers ever in the NFL.
• friendfromlowry

  Hopefully they punch each other unconscious. Hate both of them.
• Ironman92

  

  Bengals luckier than hell. 2 dropped interceptions, 2 penalties to give them 1st downs, recovered fumble
• Ironman92

  

  Weedenboys up 14-0 already
• wildcats20

  

  Randle with 86 and 2 TDs already. But Weeden is playing well.
• Ironman92

  

  21-7 Weedenboys
• Ironman92

  

  Eagles handling the Jets in the first half
• Ironman92

  

  Short passing galore but Weeden is 9/9 so far
• Terry_Tate

  

  I'm late on posting about this but how anyone could say that Tyler Eifert non-TD should not have been a catch is beyond me. Took 3 or 4 steps, turned, extended the ball 3 feet over the goal line. That play should have been dead when the ball crossed the plane. Such an awful rule.
• superman

  Terry_Tate;1753407 wrote:I'm late on posting about this but how anyone could say that Tyler Eifert non-TD should not have been a catch is beyond me. Took 3 or 4 steps, turned, extended the ball 3 feet over the goal line. That play should have been dead when the ball crossed the plane. Such an awful rule.

  Officiating is so horrible in this game.
• Ironman92

  

  Terry_Tate;1753407 wrote:I'm late on posting about this but how anyone could say that Tyler Eifert non-TD should not have been a catch is beyond me. Took 3 or 4 steps, turned, extended the ball 3 feet over the goal line. That play should have been dead when the ball crossed the plane. Such an awful rule.

  TD if it was a running play. It is dumb.
• Commander of Awesome

  

  lol Weeden on the 3rd and 1 was just hilarious.
• Ironman92

  

  Commander of Awesome;1753429 wrote:lol Weeden on the 3rd and 1 was just hilarious.

  Flipper play?
• Commander of Awesome

  

  Ironman92;1753431 wrote:Flipper play?

  The run for -4 yds