2014-2015 Cleveland Cavaliers Season Thread
-
sleeper
Old man Lee get rekt last night. Sorry but anyone who doesn't think the Cavs are far and away the favorites to win the title are morons. The reality is, as long as this team remains healthy, they are unbeatable in a 7 game series. Whoever brought in Mozgov deserves GM of the year. -
lhslep134
The fact you can't even name the Cavs GM shows you don't follow the NBA. I was going to call you out for it when you said Draymond wasn't worth a damn, but this was an equally ignorant remark.
Your NBA opinions are worth as much as Footwedge's. -
BR1986FB
Unless I'm reading wrong, "Old Man Lee" was their top scorer last night.sleeper;1708743 wrote:Old man Lee get rekt last night. Sorry but anyone who doesn't think the Cavs are far and away the favorites to win the title are morons. The reality is, as long as this team remains healthy, they are unbeatable in a 7 game series. Whoever brought in Mozgov deserves GM of the year. -
gport_tennis
8-11 for 19pts...terrible gamesleeper;1708743 wrote:Old man Lee get rekt last night. Sorry but anyone who doesn't think the Cavs are far and away the favorites to win the title are morons. The reality is, as long as this team remains healthy, they are unbeatable in a 7 game series. Whoever brought in Mozgov deserves GM of the year. -
Dr. KnOiTaLL
For discussion sake, I thought this was BS that we were left off the #1 spot, and the list in general.
http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/the-turnstile/what-cities-most-deserve-a-championship-123322846.html -
sleeper
I know who the Cavs GM is; I'm merely saying whoever made the decision to bring in Mozgov as the piece for this team deserves the GM of the year. If that was Griffin, he's a shoe-in for the award. It'll be a bigger fraud than Derek Flash-in-the-pan Rose winning the MVP.lhslep134;1708747 wrote:The fact you can't even name the Cavs GM shows you don't follow the NBA. I was going to call you out for it when you said Draymond wasn't worth a damn, but this was an equally ignorant remark.
Your NBA opinions are worth as much as Footwedge's. -
sleeper
Congrats; they lost. The Cavs properly exploited the flaw of the Warriors and that's letting Lee touch the ball more than once per game. This would be like a team shutting down LBJ, Love, and Irving and having Tristan score 30 points; 99% of the time that would be a loss.BR1986FB;1708751 wrote:Unless I'm reading wrong, "Old Man Lee" was their top scorer last night.
Why are we even discussing Lee? He's nothing more than an average front court player. -
BR1986FB
I'd assume it was Griffin who made the final decision but I'm sure Blatt was lobbying for it pretty hard.sleeper;1708766 wrote:I know who the Cavs GM is; I'm merely saying whoever made the decision to bring in Mozgov as the piece for this team deserves the GM of the year. If that was Griffin, he's a shoe-in for the award. It'll be a bigger fraud than Derek Flash-in-the-pan Rose winning the MVP. -
sleeper
Lee's team lost. GG. Rekt.gport_tennis;1708752 wrote:8-11 for 19pts...terrible game -
BR1986FB
But it wasn't Lee who got "rekt." It was his counterparts. He did fine. And we're talking about him because you brought it up and seem to be obsessed with him, for some reason.sleeper;1708770 wrote:Lee's team lost. GG. Rekt. -
sleeper
Blatt, Lebron, whoever. GM of the year should be in Cleveland.BR1986FB;1708769 wrote:I'd assume it was Griffin who made the final decision but I'm sure Blatt was lobbying for it pretty hard. -
sleeper
BR1986FB;1708772 wrote:But it wasn't Lee who got "rekt." It was his counterparts. He did fine. And we're talking about him because you brought it up and seem to be obsessed with him, for some reason.sleeper wrote:Congrats; they lost. The Cavs properly exploited the flaw of the Warriors and that's letting Lee touch the ball more than once per game. This would be like a team shutting down LBJ, Love, and Irving and having Tristan score 30 points; 99% of the time that would be a loss.
Any questions? -
SportsAndLady
Just a dumbfuck argument that I can't believe is actually happening.
Sleeper David Lee is not "awful" and stop saying rekt -
sleeper
Sure he's not awful. But he's nothing more than a role player. Curry leads the team and trying to justify that the Warriors have "more than just Curry" is ignorant. Klay is about the only other player on there that's any good.SportsAndLady;1708778 wrote:Just a dumbfuck argument that I can't believe is actually happening.
Sleeper David Lee is not "awful" and stop saying rekt -
Dr. KnOiTaLL
The Warriors have a quality bench, much better than a majority of teams in the NBA. Iguodala, Lee, Livingston, Speights, and Barbosa are all quality NBA veterans. Are they super stars? Heck no, but 9/10 teams in the NBA would LOVE to have a bench like that.sleeper;1708783 wrote:Sure he's not awful. But he's nothing more than a role player. Curry leads the team and trying to justify that the Warriors have "more than just Curry" is ignorant. Klay is about the only other player on there that's any good. -
sleeper
It's really no different that the Cavs bench; old veterans with name brand recognition. The reality is, the Warriors are basically a 2-man team with a bunch of role players and they don't have a shot in hell of beating the Cavs in a 7 game series. End of discussion.Dr. KnOiTaLL;1708793 wrote:The Warriors have a quality bench, much better than a majority of teams in the NBA. Iguodala, Lee, Livingston, Speights, and Barbosa are all quality NBA veterans. Are they super stars? Heck no, but 9/10 teams in the NBA would LOVE to have a bench like that. -
Ironman92
I rarely know the name of anyone's GM in any sport. I do not care about that aspect and they often aren't on the boob tube to see or hear about. This site is big on GMs. I'm more apt to know the ref/umps name lol.lhslep134;1708747 wrote:The fact you can't even name the Cavs GM shows you don't follow the NBA. I was going to call you out for it when you said Draymond wasn't worth a damn, but this was an equally ignorant remark.
Your NBA opinions are worth as much as Footwedge's.
I'm not saying I'm a great follower of the NBA (MLB yes).....but not sure I could name 3 GMs in either association. -
Dr. KnOiTaLL
I agree, and the Cavs bench is very solid (with the exception of Delly). But I also agree that it's pretty much the Splash Brothers and role players. Many teams are that way anymore.sleeper;1708794 wrote:It's really no different that the Cavs bench; old veterans with name brand recognition. The reality is, the Warriors are basically a 2-man team with a bunch of role players and they don't have a shot in hell of beating the Cavs in a 7 game series. End of discussion. -
robj55
Was gonna say this, thank you.lhslep134;1708705 wrote:The Spurs are predicated on ball movement and penetration. Not jump shooting. But you showing complete ignorance is par for the course. -
robj55
Actually he should have touched the ball more.sleeper;1708768 wrote:Congrats; they lost. The Cavs properly exploited the flaw of the Warriors and that's letting Lee touch the ball more than once per game. This would be like a team shutting down LBJ, Love, and Irving and having Tristan score 30 points; 99% of the time that would be a loss.
Why are we even discussing Lee? He's nothing more than an average front court player. -
robj55
David Lee is two times the player that Tristan is be real.sleeper;1708775 wrote:Any questions? -
robj55
hahaha do you actually believe this shit you post?sleeper;1708783 wrote:Sure he's not awful. But he's nothing more than a role player. Curry leads the team and trying to justify that the Warriors have "more than just Curry" is ignorant. Klay is about the only other player on there that's any good. -
rrfan
This conversation is REKT -
sleeper
No he isn't. I'd rather have TT with one arm than David Lee when he was an all-star after getting cut by the Knicks.robj55;1708819 wrote:David Lee is two times the player that Tristan is be real. -
sleeper
Brand name players past their prime are worthless. Sorry but GSW is not going to win a title with that team and certainly not against the Cavs in a 7 game series.robj55;1708820 wrote:hahaha do you actually believe this shit you post?