2014-2015 Random NFL Thread

• lhslep134

  

  Azubuike24;1697729 wrote:I gave them their props, Laley. .

  LOL wut?
  

  Azubuike24;1697710 wrote:
  If they play in the North or West, Luck may not even have a playoff appearance.

  If that's props then Iggy is a Cleveland fan.
• Ironman92

  

  lhslep134;1697725 wrote:That's where we differ. Beating that team with a banged up offense/Peyton didn't change my opinion of the Colts at all; once I saw Peyton miss everybody deeper than 15 yards, I knew that it wouldn't take too much to beat them.
  
  I didn't waver from thinking they were Luck, Vontae, and a bunch of meh.

  Guess you have never experienced your team losing to Tim Tebow in the playoffs.
  
  IF Manning was garbage, and he was.....then how can the Broncos with 8 other Pro Bowlers not beat the Colts who only have 3 very good players?....at home
• Ironman92

  

  On another note.....leading a team to 6 Super Bowls is just hard to fathom.
  
  And the Patriots have a .759 winning % since Brady took over....no one else in football within .100 and only 3 other teams over .600
• IggyPride00

  

  LOL at the Colts.
  
  They are going to give Luck $25 million a year to continually come up short in big games.
  
  They deserve everything that's coming their way in the next decade.
• IggyPride00

  

  LOL at the Steelers for cutting Blount.
  
  They allow a rapist to start at QB but apparently draw the line at whatever Blout was doing as being detrimental.
• lhslep134

  

  Ironman92;1697732 wrote:Guess you have never experienced your team losing to Tim Tebow in the playoffs.
  
  IF Manning was garbage, and he was.....then how can the Broncos with 8 other Pro Bowlers not beat the Colts who only have 3 very good players?....at home

  They didn't have 8 players who played at a pro bowl level that game.
  
  And you said it yourself: Manning was garbage. Your post undersells the importance of that incredibly important fact.
• Ironman92

  

  lhslep134;1697736 wrote:The Broncos were an incredibly banged up team. That's not an excuse in the NFL playoffs but it should certainly temper the "8 pro bowlers" argument. They didn't have 8 players who played at a pro bowl level that game.
  
  And you said it yourself: Manning was garbage. Your post undersells the importance of that incredibly important fact.

  Colts get no credit for Manning being garbage? The Bengals defensive backfield get no credit for beating Manning either?
  
  They won the division and advanced the the AFC Championship game.....a greatly successful season despite trading for T-Rich which clearly greatly affected them.
• Ironman92

  

  I can see lhslep's vein throbbing on his forehead. Lol
• lhslep134

  

  Ironman92;1697739 wrote:I can see lhslep's vein throbbing on his forehead. Lol

  Why? I can't help that you think the rest of the Colts deserve more credit than I'm giving them.
  
  
  Edit: as in it's cool we disagree
• Ironman92

  

  Shut the fuck up Doug Baldwin....just shut up. Everyone crying?
  
  This will be the most I've ever rooted on the Patriots
• Ironman92

  

  Dallas was fortunate to get by Detroit, Green Bay was fortunate to get by Dallas and Seattle was fortunate to get by Green Bay...hope this trend continues
• friendfromlowry

  Azubuike24;1697724 wrote:I DO think the Colts will win a Super Bowl or two in the next decade. The current crop of elite QB's is really dwindling and you really don't have a subsequent group to take over. It's Luck, Rodgers and everyone else...

  I don't agree with much of what else you've said, but the Colts are fortunate to have a young, great QB. Not many in the AFC can say that.
• friendfromlowry

  
  
  When you realize your wife died of typhoid fever.
• sportchampps

  Pats Cheated again deflated the footballs lol. Could cost them draft picks
• Azubuike24

  

  lhslep134;1697731 wrote:LOL wut?
  
  
  
  If that's props then Iggy is a Cleveland fan.

  See the post after where I said I think the Colts will win a Super Bowl or two. Just not there yet.
• Raw Dawgin' it

  

  
• Uz2Bon36

  

  Seattle will win. Guaranteed. Bet early while the odds are practically even.
• Rotinaj

  

  Uz2Bon36;1697807 wrote:Seattle will win. Guaranteed. Bet early while the odds are practically even.

  Seattle opened as a 2.5 point favorite and its now Pats -1. Might as well wait until it hits 1.5 or 2.
• thavoice

  Ironman92;1697732 wrote:Guess you have never experienced your team losing to Tim Tebow in the playoffs.
  
  IF Manning was garbage, and he was.....then how can the Broncos with 8 other Pro Bowlers not beat the Colts who only have 3 very good players?....at home

  That was brutal!
  
  Looks like Luck is gonna cash in. Probably a good idea to lcok him up and we will see how salary cap friendly it will be. They need help at the WR spot opp side of Hilton and DL help. They are close though and I think Lukc will continue to get better. Probably need to run the ball better.
• lhslep134

  

  Azubuike24;1697777 wrote:See the post after where I said I think the Colts will win a Super Bowl or two. Just not there yet.

  Awesome version of props
  
  "In the next 15 years or so you guys will win a Super Bowl with a top 3 QB"
• thavoice

  IggyPride00;1697735 wrote:LOL at the Steelers for cutting Blount.
  
  They allow a rapist to start at QB but apparently draw the line at whatever Blout was doing as being detrimental.

  Yeah, woulda been nice to have blount when Bell got hurt, but the fact of the matter was that Blount was a backup, was pouting and started to walk off the field late in a game when he wasnt getting any snaps.
  
  
  
  When the packers DB went down after that last pick my step son asked why he had done that and explained...well up by 12 with 5 to go and the lead was good enough and what if he fumbled it back? He said he woulda keep going!
  
  Well...............
• Uz2Bon36

  

  Pats cheating again
  

  Bob Kravitz tweet wrote:Breaking: A league source tells me the NFL is investigating the possibility the Patriots deflated footballs Sunday night. More to come.

  http://www.wpxi.com/news/sports/report-nfl-investigating-charge-patriots-deflated-/njrLg/?icmp=cmgcontent_internallink_relatedcontent_2014_partners2
• lhslep134

  

  thavoice;1697933 wrote:Yeah, woulda been nice to have blount when Bell got hurt, but the fact of the matter was that Blount was a backup, was pouting and started to walk off the field late in a game when he wasnt getting any snaps.

  He wasn't getting snaps because you guys were running him out of town. All because the team was pissed he got caught with Bell with pot. Not because it was pot, because it was Bell.
• thavoice

  lhslep134;1697937 wrote:He wasn't getting snaps because you guys were running him out of town. All because the team was pissed he got caught with Bell with pot. Not because it was pot, because it was Bell.

  He wasnt getting snaps because Bell was doing something that no other steelers RB has ever been able to do in terms of running and receiving. He emerged as a RB that could do it all. Blount got jealous and pouted.
  When a back is getting almost 5 yards a carry and catching 5 balls a game out of the backfield AND splitting him out wide that is tough to want to take him out of the game.
• lhslep134

  

  Defend it however you choose. But you ran a guy out of town who is welcome in New England​. Says more about you than him.