Would a combined Reds and Indians team win the world series?
-
Commander of Awesome
You're a fucking dick dude. Nowhere in ihselp's response was he even slightly pwning you.SportsAndLady;1455580 wrote:But are the saber metrics there to support your argument!?!?!?!!? -
se-alum
Here we go, now that the numbers back up the argument, we're gonna talk about the difference in leagues.like_that;1455579 wrote:Have them play in the AL where there isn't a free out every 9th batter and see if they have better numbers. LOL, keep on being butt hurt though. -
Terry_Tate
You'd seriously take Leake and Arroyo over Bailey? That honestly shocks me.se-alum;1455576 wrote:Nope, just Bailey. Cueto, Latos, Leake, and Arroyo all have better numbers than any of the Indians starters. -
Commander of Awesome
Mindgames with opposing teams.Terry_Tate;1455588 wrote:You'd seriously take Leake and Arroyo over Bailey? That honestly shocks me.
-
like_that
Uhhh yeah, when you are going to compare stats of pitchers, one would think numbers should be skewed a bit in the NL's favor since they have a free out every 9th batter. Don't let logic get in the way of your hurt butt though.se-alum;1455586 wrote:
Here we go, now that the numbers don't back up the argument, we're gonna talk about the difference in leagues. -
se-alum
You gotta go strictly by the numbers, and only this years numbers.Terry_Tate;1455588 wrote:You'd seriously take Leake and Arroyo over Bailey? That honestly shocks me. -
SportsAndLady
OMG DUDE THAT WAS SO CLEVERCommander of Awesome;1455585 wrote:You're a fucking dick dude. Nowhere in ihselp's response was he even slightly pwning you. -
Rotinaj
Do you think the Indians have a better pitching staff???like_that;1455590 wrote:Uhhh yeah, when you are going to compare stats of pitchers, one would think numbers should be skewed a bit in the NL's favor since they have a free out every 9th batter. Don't let logic get in the way of your hurt butt though. -
royal_k
Not at all. But not including Masterson id a complete fail.Rotinaj;1455595 wrote:Do you think the Indians have a better pitching staff??? -
royal_kAnd there is a big difference in facing a pitcher and facing a DH.
-
Rotinaj7 of the top 12 ERAs are from the AL. I agree theres a difference but if it were a big one those numbers would be different.
-
Laley23You are all idiots. Seriosuly. How has no one pointed out that Brandon Phillips is starting on this fictional team over Jason Kipnis!!!!
MAJORFUCKINGFAIL! -
Ironman92This catcher talk is all moot if Dusty is your manager.
I wouldn't have trouble with any of the catchers. Hanigan was one of our MVP's last year IMO....but not doing it this year. I love Santana's bat and on DH day he's the guy....but Gomes gets his fair share of starts. Teams don't really run much so Hanigan's ability doesn't get used much....and Hanigan's might be the best receiving catcher in the league.
Gomes and Santana get my starts....but Hanigan goes in if Gomes struggles with the bat. -
Heretic
I remember that and was thinking the same thing.Terry_Tate;1455495 wrote:All of this just reminds me of the Jason Kipnis > Brandon Phillips talk, haha. -
Laley23
whoa whoa whoa. I skimmed through this REALLY fast, so I apologize in advance if I am mixing up posters/arguments.se-alum;1455591 wrote:You gotta go strictly by the numbers, and only this years numbers.
But why are we going on this years numbers for pitchers, but we are going with Hannigans track record and the lack of one for Gomes as well as Santanas relatively disappointing career numbers? -
Rotinaj
Ironman'dIronman92;1455609 wrote:This catcher talk is all moot if Dusty is your manager.
I wouldn't have trouble with any of the catchers. Hanigan was one of our MVP's last year IMO....but not doing it this year. I love Santana's bat and on DH day he's the guy....but Gomes gets his fair share of starts. Teams don't really run much so Hanigan's ability doesn't get used much....and Hanigan's might be the best receiving catcher in the league.
Gomes and Santana get my starts....but Hanigan goes in if Gomes struggles with the bat. -
se-alum
My argument on the catchers was that Hanigan is a heck of a catcher and his career numbers prove it, but lhs wanted to look at this year only, so I conceded the catcher argument, and looked at this years numbers only for the pitchers.Laley23;1455611 wrote:whoa whoa whoa. I skimmed through this REALLY fast, so I apologize in advance if I am mixing up posters/arguments.
But why are we going on this years numbers for pitchers, but we are going with Hannigans track record and the lack of one for Gomes as well as Santanas relatively disappointing career numbers? -
Laley23
Ooooooh ok. Lol. I was so confused.se-alum;1455613 wrote:My argument on the catchers was that Hanigan is a heck of a catcher and his career numbers prove it, but lhs wanted to look at this year only, so I conceded the catcher argument, and looked at this years numbers only for the pitchers. -
Azubuike24Fun times. Almost 5 pages of discussion about a video game team. I guess that's what happens when both teams can't win their own damn games.
Lost on the WHOLE THING is the fact that the OP had Xavier Paul starting. Xavier Paul. I'd rank him about 8th overall in the OF if you combined the teams, and he was the starting LF.
I can't get past that to argue any other points... -
Terry_TateAzubuike24;1455620 wrote:Fun times. Almost 5 pages of discussion about a video game team. I guess that's what happens when both teams can't win their own damn games.
Lost on the WHOLE THING is the fact that the OP had Xavier Paul starting. Xavier Paul. I'd rank him about 8th overall in the OF if you combined the teams, and he was the starting LF.
I can't get past that to argue any other points...
Believe me, that was the first thing I noticed, Lol. Over Bourne nonetheless. Bruce, Choo, and Bourne is a niiiice outfield. -
se-alum
I'm sure that's the first thing everyone noticed, but it was so ludicrous it wasn't worth talking about.Azubuike24;1455620 wrote:Fun times. Almost 5 pages of discussion about a video game team. I guess that's what happens when both teams can't win their own damn games.
Lost on the WHOLE THING is the fact that the OP had Xavier Paul starting. Xavier Paul. I'd rank him about 8th overall in the OF if you combined the teams, and he was the starting LF.
I can't get past that to argue any other points... -
Laley23FTR:
1. Bourn CF
2. Choo RF
3. Votto 1B
4. Phillips 2B
5. Santana C
6. Swisher DH
7. Cabrera SS
8. Reynolds 3B
9. Brantley LF
BENCH: Bruce, Aviles, Hannigan, Frazier
SP Cueto
SP Masterson
SP Bailey
SP Jiminez
SP Latos
RP Kazmir
RP Pestano
RP Broxton
RP Smith
RP Marshall
RP Allen
CL Chapman
Struggled with Brantley/Bruce and Allen (in the pen) vs. another bench player. Since I went the extra BP guy, I went with Aviles who can play OF and 3 IF positions on the bench. Brantley is starting over Bruce because I have him in the 9 hole. If I was forced to shake the line-up around so he was middle of the line-up, Bruce might get the start. -
se-alum
I think Bruce is too much of a run producer to not be in the everyday lineup. Also, if Aviles can play 3rd, I would leave Frazier off, and maybe add Cozart.Laley23;1455625 wrote:FTR:
1. Bourn CF
2. Choo RF
3. Votto 1B
4. Phillips 2B
5. Santana C
6. Swisher DH
7. Cabrera SS
8. Reynolds 3B
9. Brantley LF
BENCH: Bruce, Aviles, Hannigan, Frazier
SP Cueto
SP Masterson
SP Bailey
SP Jiminez
SP Latos
RP Kazmir
RP Pestano
RP Broxton
RP Smith
RP Marshall
RP Allen
CL Chapman
Struggled with Brantley/Bruce and Allen (in the pen) vs. another bench player. Since I went the extra BP guy, I went with Aviles who can play OF and 3 IF positions on the bench. Brantley is starting over Bruce because I have him in the 9 hole. If I was forced to shake the line-up around so he was middle of the line-up, Bruce might get the start. -
SportsAndLadyBruce not in the lineup? Lol come on
-
RotinajIf you aren't going to start Bruce in the OF hes a 100000% better option at DH than Swisher.