Will there be a Civil War II?

• SportsAndLady

  

  thavoice;1738534 wrote:Just wait, in 20-30 years there will be something even more disgusting and immoral that is given the green light by our government and this paved the way for it to happen and you will all be up and arms and posting on JJchatter (justin and JJ come together with a mega merge that was originally held up because the government thought it would become a monopolgy) and think to yourself "for fucks sake, thavoice was right"

  Except no one thinks gay marriage is disgusting and immoral other than overly religious retarded losers like you and Quaker.
  
  Seriously, LOL if you think homosexuality is some sort of stepping stone to men fucking horses or microwaves or whatever the hell else you whackjobs think its equivalent to.
• friendfromlowry

  QuakerOats;1738474 wrote:Please articulate your thoughts on the following 'damage' with particular emphasis on their exponential increases vis-a-vis the current regime's policies which is accelerating said 'damage', and the pathway to 'repair':
  
  $18 trillion in national debt - 44% of which occurred in just the last 7 years
  
  93.6 million Americans without a job -- which is 42% of available working age people, 16-68.
  
  Lowest labor participation rate since 1977, and accelerating
  
  46 million Americans on food stamps ----- record high and accelerating
  
  11 million on disability --- record high and accelerating
  
  20 million illegal aliens and/or criminals ---- record high and accelerating
  
  obamacare ---- disastrous legislation continuing to inflict massive damage to health care and the economy
  
  federal agencies turned oppressive and tyrannical
  
  
  Thank you.

  You don't like President Obama. We get it. No one cared 500 whiny posts ago and they don't now.
  

  SportsAndLady;1738590 wrote:Except no one thinks gay marriage is disgusting and immoral other than overly religious retarded losers like you and Quaker.
  
  Seriously, LOL if you think homosexuality is some sort of stepping stone to men fucking horses or microwaves or whatever the hell else you whackjobs think its equivalent to.

  This. Reps.
  Edit: Nvm. Can't. Sorry.
• Al Bundy

  SportsAndLady;1738590 wrote:Except no one thinks gay marriage is disgusting and immoral other than overly religious retarded losers like you and Quaker.
  
  Seriously, LOL if you think homosexuality is some sort of stepping stone to men fucking horses or microwaves or whatever the hell else you whackjobs think its equivalent to.

  Most straight guys would find the idea of hooking up with another man disgusting. Best of luck to you and the guy that you hook up with.
• iclfan2

  

  Al Bundy;1738594 wrote:Most straight guys would find the idea of hooking up with another man disgusting. Best of luck to you and the guy that you hook up with.

  Ha, I was thinking the same thing. I get the immoral argument, but it's still disgusting as hell.
  
  
  Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
• isadore

  gosh a ruddies folks are Al and iclfan2 showing signs of latent homosexuality : "A 1996 study conducted at the University of Georgia by Henry Adams, Lester Wright Jr., and Bethany Lohr[SUP][1][/SUP] indicates that a number of homophobic males exhibit latent homosexuality. The research was done on 64 heterosexual men, 35 of whom exhibited homophobic traits and 29 who did not. They were assigned to groups on the basis of their scores on the Index of Homophobia (W. W. Hudson & W. A. Ricketts, 1980). The groups did not differ in aggression.[SUP][1][/SUP]Three tests were conducted using penile plethysmography. While there was no difference in response when the men were exposed to heterosexual and lesbian pornography, there was a major difference in response when the men were exposed to male homosexual pornography.
  The researchers reported that 24% of the non-homophobic men showed some degree of tumescence in response to the male homosexual video, compared to 54% of the subjects who scored high on the homophobia scale. In addition, 66% of the non-homophobic group showed no significant increases in tumescence after this video, but only 20% of the homophobic men failed to display any arousal. Additionally, when the participants rated their degree of sexual arousal later, the homophobic men significantly underestimated their degree of arousal by the male homosexual video.
  The results of this study indicate that individuals who score in the homophobic range and admit negative affect toward homosexuality demonstrate significant sexual arousal to male homosexual erotic stimuli."
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latent_homosexuality
• SportsAndLady

  

  Al Bundy;1738594 wrote:Most straight guys would find the idea of hooking up with another man disgusting. Best of luck to you and the guy that you hook up with.

  I said Gay MARRIAGE. Not two men buttfucking each other. Obviously I would consider the latter disgusting if I was physically watching it. But then again I would consider most straight couples' sex disgusting since probably 90% of people are either ugly or fat and I don't like watching ugly or fat people have sex.
  
  But if you think a wedding is disgusting but the two people getting married are men (or women), well you have some issues.
• DeyDurkie5

  

  The people that don't agree with gay marriage are the immature people that don't see it as love. They are clearly thinking about a weiner going into a butt. Which in an ironic way, makes them gay. I'm looking at you thavoice
• Al Bundy

  SportsAndLady;1738611 wrote:I said Gay MARRIAGE. Not two men buttfucking each other. Obviously I would consider the latter disgusting if I was physically watching it. But then again I would consider most straight couples' sex disgusting since probably 90% of people are either ugly or fat and I don't like watching ugly or fat people have sex.
  
  But if you think a wedding is disgusting but the two people getting married are men (or women), well you have some issues.

  Unless the marriage is just a ploy to gain financial advantages through medical benefits, taxes, social security, etc. that is what gay married guys do. The question of whether it is disgusting and whether they should be allowed to do it, are two different questions. The gay community wants people to accept their behavior, but then make judgements on others that have alternative views on marriage. Many of them are just hypocrites.
• Heretic

  

  Al Bundy;1738628 wrote:Unless the marriage is just a ploy to gain financial advantages through medical benefits, taxes, social security, etc. that is what gay married guys do. The question of whether it is disgusting and whether they should be allowed to do it, are two different questions. The gay community wants people to accept their behavior, but then make judgements on others that have alternative views on marriage. Many of them are just hypocrites.

  Much like how social conservatives love to tell other people how they should live their life (using terms like "disgusting" and "immoral" to describe stuff they're against), but then cry like bitches about other groups "ramming their agenda" down their throats?
• SportsAndLady

  

  Al Bundy;1738628 wrote:Unless the marriage is just a ploy to gain financial advantages through medical benefits, taxes, social security, etc. that is what gay married guys do. The question of whether it is disgusting and whether they should be allowed to do it, are two different questions. The gay community wants people to accept their behavior, but then make judgements on others that have alternative views on marriage. Many of them are just hypocrites.

  Sure lets steer the conversation that way, because that's 100% the direction I wanted it to go...?
  
  You literally just spewed a bunch of random shit that had nothing to do with my post.
  
  Gay marriage isn't "disgusting" or "immoral". If you believe it is, then you probably have a psychological problem. Lol
• Al Bundy

  SportsAndLady;1738631 wrote:Sure lets steer the conversation that way, because that's 100% the direction I wanted it to go...?
  
  You literally just spewed a bunch of random shit that had nothing to do with my post.
  
  Gay marriage isn't "disgusting" or "immoral". If you believe it is, then you probably have a psychological problem. Lol

  lol....You are into guys hooking up, and I have the psychological problem? I find it disgusting, but best of luck to you and your boyfriend. In your post, you could replace "gay marriage" with any alternative type of marriage. Do you believe that marriage should just become a free for all and anyone can get married?
• SportsAndLady

  

  Al Bundy;1738633 wrote:lol....You are into guys hooking up, and I have the psychological problem? I find it disgusting, but best of luck to you and your boyfriend. In your post, you could replace "gay marriage" with any alternative type of marriage. Do you believe that marriage should just become a free for all and anyone can get married?

  There we go. There it is.
  
  I think two men marrying isn't disgusting and immoral, so I'm all for a man marrying a microwave or a dolphin or a fucking kangaroo.
  
  Derp.
• Al Bundy

  SportsAndLady;1738634 wrote:There we go. There it is.
  
  I think two men marrying isn't disgusting and immoral, so I'm all for a man marrying a microwave or a dolphin or a fucking kangaroo.
  
  Derp.

  According to your logic, if you are against that "you probably have a psychological problem."
• DeyDurkie5

  

  Al Bundy;1738636 wrote:According to your logic, if you are against that "you probably have a psychological problem."

  Humans=microwaves
  
  /albundylogic
• Heretic

  

  Al Bundy;1738633 wrote:lol....You are into guys hooking up, and I have the psychological problem? I find it disgusting, but best of luck to you and your boyfriend. In your post, you could replace "gay marriage" with any alternative type of marriage. Do you believe that marriage should just become a free for all and anyone can get married?

  Look up "Logical Fallacy", followed by "Slippery Slope Argument". And there is this argument in a nutshell.
• Al Bundy

  DeyDurkie5;1738637 wrote:Humans=microwaves
  
  /albundylogic

  
  Funny how you and Sports have to make up things when your logic falls apart. Are you saying that any humans should be allowed to marry if they consent?
• Al Bundy

  Heretic;1738638 wrote:Look up "Logical Fallacy", followed by "Slippery Slope Argument". And there is this argument in a nutshell.

  I agree that we have created a slippery slope. The ruling last week opens the door. I also agree that they have a logical fallacy. There is argument is not to judge anyone, but then they turn around and judge people.
• DeyDurkie5

  

  Al Bundy;1738639 wrote:Funny how you and Sports have to make up things when your logic falls apart. Are you saying that any humans should be allowed to marry if they consent?

  I'm just going off what you post bunds. You come across as a closet gay. Simple as that.
• Automatik

  

  
• Al Bundy

  DeyDurkie5;1738641 wrote:I'm just going off what you post bunds. You come across as a closet gay. Simple as that.

  Sports was the one who posted that, not me. I believe in following the constitution. The constitution says marriage is a state issue.
• isadore

  The purposefully ill informed can believe what ever they want. BUT the 14th Amendment to the Constitution says "No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States...nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." And that is why bigots can not deny the right to marry to interracial or gay couples. It is in the Constitution.
• SportsAndLady

  

  Al Bundy;1738645 wrote:Sports was the one who posted that, not me. I believe in following the constitution. The constitution says marriage is a state issue.

  But does it say anything about me marrying my next door neighbors frog?!?! Because after all this gay marriage stuff, im really starting to believe that I can marry my next door neighbors frog!!!
  
  Fucking dumbass lol
• rmolin73

  

  Some of the guys on here that are flaming the fuck out over what two consenting adults do need to read up on the case that was the benchmark for overturning the marriage laws. I bet many people who at the time equated people that weren't white animals or less than human feel the same way then that you all do now. Because some of you clowns are doing the same thing by throwing out the whole marrying animals garbage.
  
  https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loving_v._Virginia
• DeyDurkie5

  

  Al Bundy;1738645 wrote:Sports was the one who posted that, not me. I believe in following the constitution. The constitution says marriage is a state issue.

  Gays getting married doesn't affect you yet you act like you'll suddenly become gay. Like I said, closet homo.
• HitsRus

  

  I am not buying that we have a slippery slope danger , in as much as a religious freedom issue where churches might be forced by law to marry same sex partners if they offer the service to heterosexual couples. Our government can remain true to the Constitution in both the 2nd and the 14 th just by defining terms. If you define marriage as a heterosexual union while still maintaining a state sanctioned civil union for LGBT couples, you can be true constitutionally to all parties.