Archive

Will there be a Civil War II?

  • like_that
    gut;1737834 wrote:Riiiiigggghhhhhttttt....that's why she waited until AFTER her maternity leave to give her notice.
    The best part about that story is she probably accrued a decent amount of leave, so her company will continue to pay her a bit while she is done with them.
  • isadore
    gut;1737834 wrote:Riiiiigggghhhhhttttt....that's why she waited until AFTER her maternity leave to give her notice.
    gosh a ruddies it benefit that was given her as part of her employment and she used it, good for her.
  • QuakerOats
    We have previously discussed this to some extent in terms of a 'peaceful separation', which I would be all for. The liberals/takers/illegal aliens/big government lovers can have a couple of sections of the country, and the conservatives/producers/liberty lovers can have the rest. We may as well get on with an orderly separation as the chasm only deepens, especially under this radical regime and those likely to follow.
  • sleeper
    isadore;1737838 wrote:gosh a ruddies it benefit that was given her as part of her employment and she used it, good for her.
    That's fine. But she also burned bridges so hopefully she is prepared to handle the consequences of her own actions. I know liberals usually have trouble with that.
  • BR1986FB
    sleeper;1737820 wrote: No doubt you will take any statement and twist it into your fantasy land victim mentality.
    I think you just defined a "democrat."
  • Heretic
    BR1986FB;1737848 wrote:I think you just defined a "democrat."
    No. Politard in general, regardless of sides.
  • Automatik
    Heretic;1737851 wrote:No. Politard in general, regardless of sides.

    Ding ding ding!

    Unreal how many people fail to realize this.
  • Belly35
    The 60 was a troubled time in our country history if there was a time that would of created another civil war the 60 would have tipped the scales. I believe we as a country will see more termoil within our government, society and economic that will presser some to seek violence. I also believe that our country will be strengthen and a new direction guided by faith, value, moral and standards will set the course for America. Federal politics, politicians and government will wheeled less control over the States and its people.

    that does stop me from being prepared because a armed population is the worst fear of a out of control government and its politicians.
  • thavoice
    Belly35;1737855 wrote:The 60 was a troubled time in our country history if there was a time that would of created another civil war the 60 would have tipped the scales. I believe we as a country will see more termoil within our government, society and economic that will presser some to seek violence. I also believe that our country will be strengthen and a new direction guided by faith, value, moral and standards will set the course for America. Federal politics, politicians and government will wheeled less control over the States and its people.

    that does stop me from being prepared because a armed population is the worst fear of a out of control government and its politicians.
    Dude, those have already left the barn and they arent coming back.
  • Automatik
    Delusion at it's finest.

    I'll be glad to see the day when religion is 100% out of anything government related.
  • Belly35
    thavoice;1737856 wrote:Dude, those have already left the barn and they arent coming back.
    that what many want you to think ... I talk to people all over the USA .... today from a guy in Dallas we talked, there is a underlying feeling of what wrong and what is needed to right the ship... And it not Washington DC agenda, federal court ruling and career profiteering politicians..... Back to basic ...is what I hear
  • thavoice
    Belly35;1737860 wrote:that what many want you to think ... I talk to people all over the USA .... today from a guy in Dallas we talked, there is a underlying feeling of what wrong and what is needed to right the ship... And it not Washington DC agenda, federal court ruling and career profiteering politicians..... Back to basic ...is what I hear
    Aint happening dude, just not happening.
  • Automatik
    de·lu·sion
    dəˈlo͞oZHən/
    noun
    an idiosyncratic belief or impression that is firmly maintained despite being contradicted by what is generally accepted as reality or rational argument, typically a symptom of mental disorder.
  • Heretic
    Automatik;1737857 wrote:Delusion at it's finest.

    I'll be glad to see the day when religion is 100% out of anything government related.
    This. Times 1000000000. Maybe throw in a few more 0s for good measure.
  • Al Bundy
    isadore;1737771 wrote:the long arc of history moves toward tolerance
    a Lincoln or a MLK or the Charleston 9 work move toward greater tolerance
    until white bigots end their individual progress in that direction
    MLK wanted people to be judged on "the content of their character." Gays want people to ignore their character. They are completely opposite ideas.
  • MontyBrunswick
    Automatik;1737857 wrote:Delusion at it's finest.

    I'll be glad to see the day when religion is 100% out of anything government related.
    Why limit it to just government? Religion doesn't need to exist because it's ficticious.

    Period.
  • QuakerOats
    Automatik;1737857 wrote:Delusion at it's finest.

    I'll be glad to see the day when religion is 100% out of anything government related.

    And most of us will be glad to see the day when government is 100% out of religion, and everything else.

    Fuck BIG government and the tyranny it brings.
  • Automatik
    QuakerOats;1737881 wrote:And most of us will be glad to see the day when government is 100% out of religion, and everything else.

    Fuck BIG government and the tyranny it brings.
    The solution to that is simple: stop electing government officials that push their religious agendas for whatever reason(s). Easier said than done though.

    I'm not sure you know the definition of tyranny. Just to confirm, you're saying the US is under a tyrannical government? If yes, please elaborate. How has this "tyrannical" regime affected you directly?
  • isadore
    sleeper;1737828 wrote:And managers have the right to not hire employees who have the potential to interrupt their business operations.
    they do not have the right to refuse to hire women having children.
  • isadore
    gut;1737834 wrote:Riiiiigggghhhhhttttt....that's why she waited until AFTER her maternity leave to give her notice.
    she was just exercising her right to be employed or leave that job. gosh a ruddies she just decided to raise her children as a stay at home parent that is not a bad thing.
  • isadore
    Al Bundy;1737870 wrote:MLK wanted people to be judged on "the content of their character." Gays want people to ignore their character. They are completely opposite ideas.
    please explain how standing up for their basic right to marriage is hiding their character.
  • Bio-Hazzzzard
    Automatik;1737891 wrote:The solution to that is simple: stop electing government officials that push their religious agendas for whatever reason(s).
    I'm glad Mr. Obama doesn't push his agendas on anyone, LOL.
  • HitsRus
    I'm curious what Isadore does for a living:laugh:
  • DeyDurkie5
    Belly35;1737860 wrote:that what many want you to think ... I talk to people all over the USA .... today from a guy in Dallas we talked, there is a underlying feeling of what wrong and what is needed to right the ship... And it not Washington DC agenda, federal court ruling and career profiteering politicians..... Back to basic ...is what I hear
    A guy from Dallas said it so that's the feeling of the country. Got it, belly.
  • sleeper
    HitsRus;1737903 wrote:I'm curious what Isadore does for a living:laugh:
    He doesn't work. Imagine that.