Archive

Big passenger jet may have gone down

  • gut
    Anna-Town;1592744 wrote:This is my favorite theory yet ...
    http://mh370shadow.com/post/79838944823/did-malaysian-airlines-370-disappear-using-sia68-sq68

    It is sitting on a runway in the middle east
    That is a good one.

    I'm working on my own theory that involves a series of barges to form a floating runway...
  • gut
    reclegend22;1592697 wrote:It's possible that only one of the pilots was involved and the other was killed sometime during the flight. In that scenario, there were probably passengers involved. If the younger pilot was behind it, it would make sense since his was the last voice heard by Malaysian air traffic control, a few minutes prior to the flight transponder being turned off. If the older pilot was the one in on it -- the sophisticated flight simulator in his house might point toward this -- then he easily could have killed the younger pilot as soon as the last contact with control was made.

    There are endless possibilities, but right now who in the hell knows.
    It doesn't have to be any more complicated than the co-pilot locking the captain out when he went to take a piss.

    Apparently not uncommon for pilots to own flight simulators...lol, a reporter today asked Carney if the US was ruling out that the plane landed at Diego Garcia. I don't know how Carney kept a straight face.
  • reclegend22
    gut;1592748 wrote:LOL - please don't confuse someone who doesn't post ignorant bullshit with someone pretending to be an expert....it only takes a minimal amount of google searching not to get sucked in by CNN's typically crap reporting that you apparently took as gospel.

    In their defense, it's hard to turn the 6 facts we actually know into several hundred hours of coverage.
    And yet you posted that there might be some credibility to some off-the-wall theory that some congressman came up with about the pilot hatching this plan as some sort of intricate life insurance scam. Lol.
  • gut
    reclegend22;1592803 wrote:And yet you posted that there might be some credibility to some off-the-wall theory that some congressman came up with about the pilot hatching this plan as some sort of intricate life insurance scam. Lol.
    It's no less likely than anything else...in fact lacking compelling evidence otherwise, suicide or mechanical failure would be the only plausible explanations. Have you never heard of people committing suicide and trying to hide it so family can get insurance?

    I only posted what the guy said. I thought it was interesting, and could certainly be one explanation why the pilot didn't just nose-dive into the drink. And it's really not some intricate scheme - lock the captain out, turn the plane west over the ocean, and depressurize the cabin. In fact, it's a far simpler idea than all these elaborate conspiracy theories. And you know what they say about the simplest explanation...
  • se-alum
    gut;1592808 wrote:It's no less likely than anything else...in fact lacking compelling evidence otherwise, suicide or mechanical failure would be the only plausible explanations. Have you never heard of people committing suicide and trying to hide it so family can get insurance?

    I only posted what the guy said. I thought it was interesting, and could certainly be one explanation why the pilot didn't just nose-dive into the drink. And it's really not some intricate scheme - lock the captain out, turn the plane west over the ocean, and depressurize the cabin. In fact, it's a far simpler idea than all these elaborate conspiracy theories. And you know what they say about the simplest explanation...
    Like I said, it would be a terrible plan. The likelihood of anyone seeing that insurance money is very slim. It's a least, I believe a 7-10 year wait in missing persons cases, and it would be tied up in court for decades after that, especially if the body is never recovered.
  • reclegend22
    gut;1592808 wrote:It's no less likely than anything else...in fact lacking compelling evidence otherwise, suicide or mechanical failure would be the only plausible explanations. Have you never heard of people committing suicide and trying to hide it so family can get insurance?

    I only posted what the guy said. I thought it was interesting, and could certainly be one explanation why the pilot didn't just nose-dive into the drink. And it's really not some intricate scheme - lock the captain out, turn the plane west over the ocean, and depressurize the cabin. In fact, it's a far simpler idea than all these elaborate conspiracy theories. And you know what they say about the simplest explanation...
    What it is so elaborate about the pilot and possibly a team of cohorts overtaking the plane and diverting it to some unknown location for either a hostage negotiation or some other form of terror-related activity? Prior to 9/11, you would have been here talking about how hijacking four commercial airliners and using them to knock down the Twin Towers in New York City is an elaborate conspiracy theory.

    As you said yourself, your theory is no less likely than anything else. Anything and almost everything is on the table at this point.
  • lhslep134
    http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/465557/Malaysian-plane-20-on-board-worked-for-ELECTRONIC-WARFARE-and-radar-defence-company
  • SportsAndLady
    reclegend22;1592813 wrote:What it is so elaborate about the pilot and possibly a team of cohorts overtaking the plane and diverting it to some unknown location for either a hostage negotiation or some other form of terror-related activity? Prior to 9/11, you would have been here talking about how hijacking four commercial airliners and using them to knock down the Twin Towers in New York City is an elaborate conspiracy theory.
    Fucking this x1000. Is it really that crazy to believe that terrorists could plan a hijacking of a plane leaving Malasia? lol
  • SportsAndLady
    But but but!

    How would they escape radar!!?
  • bases_loaded
    Wow. The Blaze had this the weekend after the disappearance, but I discounted it because The Blaze
  • lhslep134
    SportsAndLady;1592829 wrote:But but but!

    How would they escape radar!!?
    I found that article from, of all places, facebook. It was trending. Pretty f*cking intriguing.
  • gut
    reclegend22;1592813 wrote: As you said yourself, your theory is no less likely than anything else. Anything and almost everything is on the table at this point.
    There's no chatter and no connections to this point. Nothing has been reported that indicates potential terrorism or hijacking. It's only been 11-12 days, but as of right now there's been nothing to indicate more than one person was involved, acting alone. You are aware that "conspiracy" involves more than 1 person?

    Absent additional data and evidence, given that catastrophic mechanical failure seems very unlikely the only logical conclusion is suicide. Is that really very difficult to understand? Suicide cannot be ruled out until a more likely motive has been plausibly established.
  • reclegend22
    SportsAndLady;1592828 wrote:Fucking this x1000. Is it really that crazy to believe that terrorists could plan a hijacking of a plane leaving Malasia? lol
    Agreed. As secure as I'm sure the airports are in Kuala Lumpur, there is certainly reason to think that after 11 days of finding nothing in the Indian Ocean -- not one piece of debris connected to this flight of any kind -- that perhaps this was a terrorist-related hi-jacking and that the aircraft headed toward land.
    gut wrote:...the only logical conclusion is suicide. Is that really very difficult to understand?
    Is it really that hard for you to understand that there are areas in that part of the world -- Thialand, Burma, Bangladesh -- where airspace surveillance is not up to NORAD code?
  • reclegend22
    Just yesterday -- a full 10 days after the plane vanished -- Thailand came out and said, "Oh wait, we might have seen it." Lol.
  • SizzlePig
    gut;1592896 wrote:There's no chatter and no connections to this point. Nothing has been reported that indicates potential terrorism or hijacking.
    at this point there aren't any indications of anything, is there?
  • thavoice
    This AM they were saying the pilot had some deleted files on his simulator at home. The "expert" in studio, a 777 pilot, said that it could be nothing, maybe he was messsing around having some fun, or thought it would take up too much space on the hard drive or was just embarrased how he did on that run, or was practicing some crazy stuff.

    The simulator expert said that it can store so much data and they wouldnt be running the risk of running out of space....of which the pilot expert stated taht this pilot may not have known that the system had that much memory.

    Will be intersting to see if they can get that data and see what it was
  • bases_loaded
    So the US Navy has called off its Indian Ocean search and Israel has increased their air defenses...someone knows
  • Tiernan
    When that bird comes barrelling into Tel Aviv loaded with Iranian nukes later today we'll all know...
  • Belly35
    This plane is in China .... China wants the radar technology to be invisible, control missile radar and communication. Technology to control communication and radar is dominating power.
  • Rotinaj
    Belly35;1592997 wrote:This plane is in China .... China wants the radar technology to be invisible, control missile radar and communication. Technology to control communication and radar is dominating power.
    U wot m8?
  • Manhattan Buckeye
    reclegend22;1592900 wrote:Just yesterday -- a full 10 days after the plane vanished -- Thailand came out and said, "Oh wait, we might have seen it." Lol.
    So have the Maldives. Wired magazine has an excellent piece about it crashing in the Indian Ocean - if that is correct it could take months, if not years, to locate it.
  • thavoice
    Manhattan Buckeye;1593014 wrote:So have the Maldives. Wired magazine has an excellent piece about it crashing in the Indian Ocean - if that is correct it could take months, if not years, to locate it.
    http://www.wired.com/autopia/2014/03/mh370-electrical-fire/


    Are you talking about this one? Found it and another on a link from CNN's site. The author, Goodfellow, also has another article about it. I think he is just an old pilot who doesnt want to think the worst could happen to his profession, claiming he believes they were hero's trying to save the passengers. Other things we hear just dont jive with that.....about how the change in flight direction was programmed before the last transmission and such.
  • Manhattan Buckeye
    Yeah, that's the one. It does make some sense, although not all. Including why the plane rose to 45,000 feet.
  • thavoice
    Manhattan Buckeye;1593048 wrote:Yeah, that's the one. It does make some sense, although not all. Including why the plane rose to 45,000 feet.
    The other article by him is a bit more telling that I think he is almost in denial that a pilot would so something like this on purpose.
    WHo the fuck knows though......
  • reclegend22
    Bill Nye the Science Guy is analyzing the situation on CNN right now. Looks like they're starting to bring in the big guns.