Which is worse?

• vball10set

  Manhattan Buckeye;1463810 wrote:Yeah, that is why it worked. All of the other stuff (spoilers, photos, etc.)...I get the evil red box.

  But you didn't use it in post #328, and that's why Goon responded as he did in #329
• ohiobucks1

  

  I call for Democratic Impeachment of Mods. 4 times a year, Mods should be voted on. If a mod gets over 70% bad marks, he/she should be removed and replaced. Freedom for all.
• Manhattan Buckeye

  vball10set;1463817 wrote:But you didn't use it in post #328, and that's why Goon responded as he did in #329

  Partial quote, not a complete one. Again, red box.
• vball10set

  justincredible;1463808 wrote:Indeed. Things were so much simpler when it was just the two of us. That was a good 15 minutes.

  LJ;1463814 wrote:TWSS

  :thumbup:
• vball10set

  Manhattan Buckeye;1463822 wrote:Partial quote, not a complete one. Again, red box.

  gotcha'
• Manhattan Buckeye

  A red box is coming your way, I'm trying to post a picture of a hot Asian girl (safe for work), but it likely won't work.
• like_that

  

  justincredible;1463800 wrote:It appears that there is little chance that I won't have an agenda against a certain poster if Fly is voted out, according to said poster. Further points out the "no win" situation I'm in, always. Oh well.

  Who said this?
• SportsAndLady

  

  like_that;1463831 wrote:Who said this?

  
  Better yet.. What does that post even mean lol holy double negatives
• Rotinaj

  

  ohiobucks1;1463818 wrote:I call for Democratic Impeachment of Mods. 4 times a year, Mods should be voted on. If a mod gets over 70% bad marks, he/she should be removed and replaced. Freedom for all.

  Not a bad idea. Or something like every 6 months make a poll with the names of all mods and whoever gets the least amount of votes gets the boot. Give everyone 2 votes or something. Change we can believe in!
• like_that

  

  Rotinaj;1463837 wrote:Not a bad idea. Or something like every 6 months make a poll with the names of all mods and whoever gets the least amount of votes gets the boot. Give everyone 2 votes or something. Change we can believe in!

  I suggested this a year ago. A promotion/relegation system like soccer. A lot of people liked the idea, but of course it was too logical.
• SportsAndLady

  

  Rotinaj;1463837 wrote:Not a bad idea. Or something like every 6 months make a poll with the names of all mods and whoever gets the least amount of votes gets the boot. Give everyone 2 votes or something. Change we can believe in!

  
  What a crazy idea...mods that the people actually want!
• queencitybuckeye

  Not sure why the owner of a private enterprise would turn over the running of it to the "customers".
• Laley23

  

  Rotinaj;1463837 wrote:Not a bad idea. Or something like every 6 months make a poll with the names of all mods and whoever gets the least amount of votes gets the boot. Give everyone 2 votes or something. Change we can believe in!

  I
  like the idea, but I wouldnt say lowest gets the boot. That will work for awhile, but eventually you might be replacing a good mod with a shit one because you only have good mods left. It should be like congress, a certain number is needed to stay (or on the flip, to get the boot).
• SportsAndLady

  

  queencitybuckeye;1463844 wrote:Not sure why the owner of a private enterprise would turn over the running of it to the "customers".

  
  Lol @ calling this a private enterprise. I mean yeah it's technically true. But forums' success depends on the posters. Why not keep the posters happy by allowing them to vote on the mods they feel aren't doing their job?
• vdubb96

  

  Voting on Mods is the dumbest idea ever! Just ask the mods!
• SportsAndLady

  

  Laley23;1463845 wrote:I
  like the idea, but I wouldnt say lowest gets the boot. That will work for awhile, but eventually you might be replacing a good mod with a shit one because you only have good mods left. It should be like congress, a certain number is needed to stay (or on the flip, to get the boot).

  
  Agree with this. Give a floor approval rating. If they don't meet that rating every time there's a vote, they're done
• justincredible

  

  SportsAndLady;1463833 wrote:Better yet.. What does that post even mean lol holy double negatives

  You sure about that?
• justincredible

  

  like_that;1463831 wrote:Who said this?

  I wonder.
• queencitybuckeye

  SportsAndLady;1463847 wrote:Lol @ calling this a private enterprise. I mean yeah it's technically true. But forums' success depends on the posters. Why not keep the posters happy by allowing them to vote on the mods they feel aren't doing their job?

  Because it's a exercise in futility. If you think that if Justin changes his moderator roster, that the site assholes will cease being assholes and new members will flock to the site, you're dreaming.
• vball10set

  queencitybuckeye;1463844 wrote:Not sure why the owner of a private enterprise would turn over the running of it to the "customers".

  Not a good analogy, but nice try. This would be more like giving shareholders a say in how the enterprise is run. The owner has the final say, but it's always good to keep the shareholders involved. JMO.
• SnotBubbles

  

  justincredible;1463800 wrote:It appears that there is little chance that I won't have an agenda against a certain poster if Fly is voted out, according to said poster. Further points out the "no win" situation I'm in, always. Oh well.

  Don't put it to a fucking vote. It's your website. You appoint, you ban, you regulate content. If people don't like it, they can fuck off.
  
  Suggestions are great, but if you're happy with the moderation you have and they're doing the job you want them to do....fuck everyone else.
  
  Don't forget the fact that this is your website. If it's going to work, you need to run it accordingly, like you're the boss and we are your minions. Run it like a business, let people know you're the boss.
  
  And change your avatar to this:
  
• Ironman92

  

  GOONx19;1463726 wrote:Okay, F4F, he read too much into it. Regardless, you haven't really helped your reputation with this thread. A few people have even said they now understand what the complaining is about. I just don't want to see this site lose any more posters, because when there's only 50 active posters every one counts. I personally love what the OC offers. A good mix of sports and bullshit, and it's way easier for me to keep up to date on current events by just scrolling through the front page than to find it elsewhere. But when people start leaving, the impact is exponential.

  
  Good post.
• justincredible

  

  I am going to put my ownership of the site up for a vote.
• Curly J

  

  justincredible;1463808 wrote:Indeed. Things were so much simpler when it was just the two of us. That was a good 15 minutes.

  TWSS.
  
  EDIT: lolfail on me not seeing LJ beating me to the douchery
• wes_mantooth

  

  justincredible;1463860 wrote:I am going to put my pwnership of the site up for a vote.

  fixed.