Archive

Tuscaloosa Rednecks vs a Guy Named Dabo

  • Azubuike24
    Sonofanump;1775044 wrote:Are you referring to the year Auburn won the Cam Newton bidding war?
    No, in 2012 they went 0-8 under Chizik and then played FSU for the title.
  • vball10set
    http://ohiostate.247sports.com/Bolt/OSU-snubbed-in-final-AP-poll-42763766?utm_source=247Sports+Newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=160112_083549_Ohio+State+Buckeyes&utm_content=Link
  • SportsAndLady
    That's a joke. Not sure why everyone was so obsessed with Stanford this year. The talk of them getting in over osu if a spot opened up annoyed the shit out of me.
  • sherm03
    LOL at Lane Kiffin getting left at the stadium. Fuck Lane Kiffin.

    http://thecomeback.com/blog/ncaa/the-alabama-buses-left-without-lane-kiffin-after-championship-win.html
  • queencitybuckeye
    SportsAndLady;1775052 wrote:That's a joke. Not sure why everyone was so obsessed with Stanford this year. The talk of them getting in over osu if a spot opened up annoyed the shit out of me.
    The schedule argument. All it means is that if you lost two games, you scheduled above your competence. I'd put them at 6 or 7.
  • sportswizuhrd
    SportsAndLady;1775052 wrote:That's a joke. Not sure why everyone was so obsessed with Stanford this year. The talk of them getting in over osu if a spot opened up annoyed the shit out of me.
    They were ranked over you guys going into the bowl games and beat a team ranked higher than them by nearly double of what you guys did to a team ranked lower. From each teams bowl performances (and that only)what makes you think OSU should jump Stanford?
  • queencitybuckeye
    sportswizuhrd;1775111 wrote:They were ranked over you guys going into the bowl games and beat a team ranked higher than them by nearly double of what you guys did to a team ranked lower. From each teams bowl performances (and that only)what makes you think OSU should jump Stanford?
    They shouldn't have gone in rated higher than tOSU.
    They are allowed to watch the games.
    If they watched the games, they would have seen that the domers were heads and tails better than Iowa.

    In your opinion, should the pollsters not correct past mistakes?
  • SportsAndLady
    sportswizuhrd;1775111 wrote:They were ranked over you guys going into the bowl games and beat a team ranked higher than them by nearly double of what you guys did to a team ranked lower. From each teams bowl performances (and that only)what makes you think OSU should jump Stanford?
    They shouldn't have ever been above osu is my point.
  • sleeper
    Azubuike24;1775036 wrote:Disagree. I think other conferences are much more clearly defined 2-6. My point was though, I'd probably take the top 3-5 in other conferences over the SEC right now, only because picking their top 5 would be much easier. I mean, the SEC had a team go winless in the conference and the next season, went to the national title game. That's pretty mind-blowing. It just doesn't happen.
    Only in your mind dude. When SEC teams schedule they way they do with timing cupcakes late in the season coupled with their annual over-inflated pre-season rankings you will always believe that. The reality is, the SEC has been a 1 man horse like every other conference for the past decade. Auburn having a good run in 1 season is meaningless, look at Iowa this year for example.
  • sleeper
    sportswizuhrd;1775111 wrote:They were ranked over you guys going into the bowl games and beat a team ranked higher than them by nearly double of what you guys did to a team ranked lower. From each teams bowl performances (and that only)what makes you think OSU should jump Stanford?
    OSU would blow out Stanford every year since the dawn of time. The fact that a 2 loss team, who is complete garbage, gets in over a team who's lost 4 games in 4 seasons is an absolutely joke.

    Now, in reality, who cares? #3 or #4 is rather irrelevant. Alabama was lucky that OSU coaches decided to run JT more than Zeke against MSU because there's no way Alabama comes within 4 TDs of OSU this year.
  • sleeper
    queencitybuckeye;1775113 wrote:They shouldn't have gone in rated higher than tOSU.
    They are allowed to watch the games.
    If they watched the games, they would have seen that the domers were heads and tails better than Iowa.

    In your opinion, should the pollsters not correct past mistakes?
    Seriously this. If you watched the Fiesta bowl, it was a complete dressing down of a much better team than Iowa. The final score doesn't really tell the whole story of the game; imagine if Bosa didn't get some BS targeting penalty. Final score would have been 69-0 and OSU would probably have gotten a few #1 votes in the polls.
  • sportswizuhrd
    SportsAndLady;1775114 wrote:They shouldn't have ever been above osu is my point.
    Why would they rank a Conference champion behind 2 non-conference champions from the same conference? If they had done what you are wanting with two SEC teams ahead of Ohio State, this board along with every OSU board would be in a major uproar.
  • sportswizuhrd
    queencitybuckeye;1775113 wrote:They shouldn't have gone in rated higher than tOSU.
    They are allowed to watch the games.
    If they watched the games, they would have seen that the domers were heads and tails better than Iowa.

    In your opinion, should the pollsters not correct past mistakes?
    No I don't think they should. Otherwise, just compare teams seasons to each other.
  • SportsAndLady
    sportswizuhrd;1775127 wrote:I used the CFP rankings, I guess the AP rankings were different.

    Why would they rank a Conference champion behind 2 non-conference champions from the same conference? If they had done what you are wanting with two SEC teams ahead of Ohio State, this board along with every OSU board would be in a major uproar.
    Why would a one loss osu team be ranked ahead of a 2 loss Stanford team? Ummmm
  • queencitybuckeye
    sportswizuhrd;1775130 wrote:No I don't think they should. Otherwise, just compare teams seasons to each other.
    The "stairstep" stuff is shit. Pure excrement. That they put them in a certain order last week should have no bearing on this week.
  • sportswizuhrd
    SportsAndLady;1775131 wrote:Why would a one loss osu team be ranked ahead of a 2 loss Stanford team? Ummmm
    Yes, let's totally forget that one team won a conference championship and the other didn't and had to play 1 more conference game than the Big Ten. Let's also forget that's Stanford is on a 4 game winning streak while OSU is on a 2 game winning streak. These aren't conference/division standings.
  • sportswizuhrd
    queencitybuckeye;1775132 wrote:The "stairstep" stuff is shit. Pure excrement. That they put them in a certain order last week should have no bearing on this week.
    All things equal though. Neither team lost. I would be saying the same thing if the rankings were reversed going into the Bowl game and the voters established, we DGAF about conference titles. Consistency.

    Stanford beat ND too a few games ago. Does that help them? I still say them winning the Pac-12 puts them ahead of anyone who didn't win their respective conference championship.
  • queencitybuckeye
    sportswizuhrd;1775139 wrote:
    Stanford beat ND too a few games ago. Does that help them?
    Compared to the extra large can Ohio State opened on ND, I'd say no, that game didn't help their cause.
  • sportswizuhrd
    queencitybuckeye;1775140 wrote:Compared to the extra large can Ohio State opened on ND, I'd say no, that game didn't help their cause.
    Not saying ND folded against OSU but they had a hell of a lot more to play for against Stanford than they did against OSU. A win against Stanford and they are likely in the final 4. A win against OSU does what for them for THIS season?
  • queencitybuckeye
    When you say not saying, you're saying.
  • superman
    sportswizuhrd;1775127 wrote:Why would they rank a Conference champion behind 2 non-conference champions from the same conference?
    Because they got shut out by the 6th place team from that confernce?
  • sportswizuhrd
    superman;1775150 wrote:Because they got shut out by the 6th place team from that confernce?
    False.
  • sportswizuhrd
    queencitybuckeye;1775146 wrote:When you say not saying, you're saying.
    Then I guess they did. Do you not agree that a team would be more motivated in a game that should they win they more than likely go to the playoff, over a bowl game that does nothing for their title hopes of the current season?
  • SportsAndLady
    sportswizuhrd;1775137 wrote:Yes, let's totally forget that one team won a conference championship and the other didn't and had to play 1 more conference game than the Big Ten. Let's also forget that's Stanford is on a 4 game winning streak while OSU is on a 2 game winning streak. These aren't conference/division standings.
    No one is forgetting those things they just aren't good arguments. "They've two more games in a row and they won their awful conference!" Doesn't really do much for me. But maybe that's just me.

    Having 1 less loss, having a loss to a team in the playoffs, and Stanford losing to northwestern is a much better argument for osu being ahead of Stanford.
  • superman
    sportswizuhrd;1775152 wrote:False.
    My bad. It was a double digit loss to the 5th place team.