Ohio Chatter DEV

sleeper

sherm03;1764296 wrote:Why would the CFP jeopardize the integrity of the playoffs by doing that? What do they have to gain from it? ESPN is the only one that gains from having an SEC team in the playoffs. The NCAA already made their money. They have no reason to rig the system to get an SEC team in. /sleeper'd

Or in reality, a 1-loss champion of the 2nd best conference in the country is probably going to get into the CFP. They are just predicting the champion to be Alabama.

superman

Classyposter58;1764240 wrote:Michigan ranked above Utah eh? Makes sense considering Utah beat them and they have identical records.

Also maybe I'm old school but how the hell can you have Alabama and Notre Dame above undefeated teams this late in the season? Just terrible it needs to be

1 Clemson
2 Ohio State
3 Iowa
4 Oklahoma State

5 Alabama
6 Notre Dame

The bigger crime is Stanford 9 spots higher than Northwestern.

queencitybuckeye

Classyposter58;1764240 wrote: Also maybe I'm old school but how the hell can you have Alabama and Notre Dame above undefeated teams this late in the season? Just terrible it needs to be

No, you're just stupid.

Azubuike24

Iowa and Oklahoma State are hard to rank, because neither have played anyone.

Now, they have a common opponent, Iowa State. Iowa beat them 31-17, Oklahoma State beat them 35-31.

However, Iowa State also lost to Texas Tech by 35, TCU by 24, Baylor by 18 and Oklahoma by 36.

It's hard to say either of those teams deserve to be clearly ranked over the top 1-loss teams, including Alabama, Michigan State or Notre Dame.

superman

Iowa beat Wisconsin which is one of bama's signature wins. The difference being Iowa would actually go on the road to face them.

SportsAndLady

Azubuike24;1764332 wrote:Iowa and Oklahoma State are hard to rank, because neither have played anyone.

Now, they have a common opponent, Iowa State. Iowa beat them 31-17, Oklahoma State beat them 35-31.

However, Iowa State also lost to Texas Tech by 35, TCU by 24, Baylor by 18 and Oklahoma by 36.

It's hard to say either of those teams deserve to be clearly ranked over the top 1-loss teams, including Alabama, Michigan State or Notre Dame.

Iowa hasn't played anyone?

sleeper

Azubuike24;1764332 wrote:Iowa and Oklahoma State are hard to rank, because neither have played anyone.

Now, they have a common opponent, Iowa State. Iowa beat them 31-17, Oklahoma State beat them 35-31.

However, Iowa State also lost to Texas Tech by 35, TCU by 24, Baylor by 18 and Oklahoma by 36.

It's hard to say either of those teams deserve to be clearly ranked over the top 1-loss teams, including Alabama, Michigan State or Notre Dame.

If Iowa hasn't played anyone then neither has Alabama. Only difference between Iowa and Alabama is that Iowa is undefeated whereas Bama can't even get past lowly Ole Miss.

Midstate01

SportsAndLady;1764356 wrote:Iowa hasn't played anyone?

Yes not sure I follow. Iowa has as many top 25 wins and doesn't have a loss...especially one AT HOME!

Bama gets way way way too much credit when they've struggled to beat some bad teams. They're 2nd best win is a B1G team that's not in first place in their division.

Azubuike24

SportsAndLady;1764356 wrote:Iowa hasn't played anyone?

Ohio State, Baylor, Oklahoma State, TCU and Iowa all rank outside the top 50 in SOS. So really, none of those teams have played anyone. In comparison, Notre Dame is 25 and Alabama is 3. That might be why they are getting votes ahead of other unbeaten teams (Iowa and Oklahoma State).

Ohio State is obviously exception given they are defending champs.

Azubuike24

I'm not making the numbers up. I'm using the Sagarin ratings on SOS. It breaks down top 10 wins...and top 30 wins.

http://www.sagarin.com/sports/cfsend.htm

Alabama is 6-1 vs top 30
Notre Dame is 3-1 vs top 30
Ohio State hasn't played a top 30 team
Oklahoma State is 2-0 vs top 30
Baylor is 1-1 vs top 30
Iowa is 2-0 vs top 30

wildcats20

2-0 is better than 6-1.

Azubuike24

wildcats20;1764400 wrote:2-0 is better than 6-1.

I'm not debating that. I'm just pointing out the numbers.

It's also irrelevant because Iowa isn't going to get in as a 1-loss team and if they go unbeaten they are probably the #1 or #2 seed.

Same with Oklahoma State.

Both teams will have to get huge quality wins if they want to go unbeaten anyway.

Like it or not, a 1-loss Alabama and 1-loss Notre Dame are already getting the benefit of the doubt. They will clearly remain at the very top of the 1-loss team rankings regardless.

sportswizuhrd

superman;1764354 wrote:Iowa beat Wisconsin which is one of bama's signature wins. The difference being Iowa would actually go on the road to face them.

Iowa had the choice of playing Wiscy at home or on the road?

Iowa's biggest OOC game, at home.

Bama's? Not at home.

Midstate01

When was the last time Bama played a real team away from home. And I don't mean a neutral site?

SportsAndLady

Azubuike24;1764399 wrote:I'm not making the numbers up. I'm using the Sagarin ratings on SOS. It breaks down top 10 wins...and top 30 wins.

http://www.sagarin.com/sports/cfsend.htm

Alabama is 6-1 vs top 30
Notre Dame is 3-1 vs top 30
Ohio State hasn't played a top 30 team
Oklahoma State is 2-0 vs top 30
Baylor is 1-1 vs top 30
Iowa is 2-0 vs top 30

And who decides who are top 30 teams? Biased voters.

Does anyone actually think Mississippi state is a good win? Of course not. But the voters had them in the top 30, so Alabama gets a good paper win.

superman

sportswizuhrd;1764406 wrote:Iowa had the choice of playing Wiscy at home or on the road?

Iowa's biggest OOC game, at home.

Bama's? Not at home.

Bama hasn't played a nonconference road game since 2011. Hope that helps.

Lovejoy1984

superman;1764410 wrote:Bama hasn't played a nonconference road game since 2011. Hope that helps.

And to that point, even the Neutral field games, are in the deep south.

sportswizuhrd

So they should decline invites to play USC at Jerry World (or whatever he calls that damn place) or FSU at the Georgia Dome to play a home and home series against someone like Louisville? Why would anyone do that?

SportsAndLady

sportswizuhrd;1764412 wrote:So they should decline invites to play USC at Jerry World (or whatever he calls that damn place) or FSU at the Georgia Dome to play a home and home series against someone like Louisville? Why would anyone do that?

Who said anything about Louisville?

Ohio State, Michigan, notre dame, etc. all big time programs they could schedule home and home series.

superman

Josh Doctson out for the season.

Con_Alma

Could Tayson Hill be Michigan's QB next season?

Interesting scenario here.

https://www.ksl.com/index.php?sid=37411349&nid=294&fm=home_page&s_cid=toppick2

Lovejoy1984

SportsAndLady;1764413 wrote:Who said anything about Louisville?

Ohio State, Michigan, notre dame, etc. all big time programs they could schedule home and home series.

Exactly. All have proven they aren't afraid of scheduling big names. But the SEC powers won't play a game above the mason dixon line. You may be able to get a Vandy/Tennessee to come up, but Bama/LSU/FLA etc. aren't coming.

redstreak one

Ncaa II playoffs this saturday at noon Ashland (Ohio) vs Grand Valley State for first round. Lets Go Eagles!

Azubuike24

SportsAndLady;1764408 wrote:And who decides who are top 30 teams? Biased voters.

Does anyone actually think Mississippi state is a good win? Of course not. But the voters had them in the top 30, so Alabama gets a good paper win.

Sagarin is not based on voters. Nobody is voting to come up with these rankings.

superman

Azubuike24;1764428 wrote:Sagarin is not based on voters. Nobody is voting to come up with these rankings.

Sagarin is an absolute joke. He had 14-0 Ohio State ranked behind 11-2 USC in 2002.

Archive

2015 General College Football Discussion