How bad will the Big 10 do?
-
centralbucksfan
Come on, you don't know the "SEC Rules" when determining the strength of your team, conference by now!!??jhay78 wrote:
Ah yes, there's the qualifying statement. Doesn't count unless you beat Bama, Florida, or Texas. lolrocket31 wrote:0311sdp wrote:
What in your opinion then do they need to do?:huh:rocket31 wrote:
no they didnt0311sdp wrote: The top teams in the BT proved that they are competitive with anyone,
they dont need to do anything, i could care less about the big tens perception and i dont know why anyone would.
i was just pointing out the failed logic in your statement, because the big ten never had a chance to prove its self against the sec and big 12 elite.
-
rocket31
no they did notcentralbucksfan wrote: YES, in fact they did provide proof. -
Sykotyk
The Big Ten didn't play a single 'mid-major' in the bowls.
Oregon (PAC-10), Georgia Tech (ACC), LSU (SEC), Texas Tech (Big XII), Iowa State (Big XII), Auburn (SEC), Miami (ACC).
We didn't pad our bowl lineup with our 6th spot playing the 2nd best WAC school, or 4th best C-USA school, etc.
Sykotyk -
FootwedgeBig 10 silenced their critics big time. Welll done. and....if the Northwestern kicker drills a 40 yarder, the Big 10 ends up 5-2. And let's not talk about the idiot from Minnesots that dropped the ball unhit with 2 minutes to play. The Big 10 could have easily have been 6-1 this year.
-
Footwedge
This is a bullshit post. The Big 10 matched up with the SEC right on down the line. And even Indiana/Illinois beats Vandy this year.0311sdp wrote: The top teams in the BT proved that they are competitive with anyone, however the bottom 5-6 teams in the conference are pretty bad which is not the case in the SEC, that is the difference that I see in the two conferences. The SEC bottom feeders are much better than the botom of the BT with the top of each Conference being fairly even as the overall record from 1999 in Bowls head to head shows.