Is Being Gay "Normal?"

• Con_Alma

  isadore;1080786 wrote:Group marriage, let them
  but I believe there should be limits on the ability of adults to marry minors, people mentally unable to give consent, and for incestous couples to marry. If I interfered with your life plans, sorry.

  There are limits in place. Only those who can enter a contract can marry. If you can enter a contract then the State should not be able to prevent you from being married.
• isadore

  Con_Alma;1081863 wrote:There are limits in place. Only those who can enter a contract can marry. If you can enter a contract then the State should not be able to prevent you from being married.

  The possible physical and mental harm to outspring, the abuse it will generate in family situations both argue for the incest restriction. As can be seen in the your own arguments there is a slippery slope leading to the end of protections for the underaged from abuse.
  Con_Alma "The age of consent doesn't respect the clear differences in young people's development, and as such 'punishes' the fast developers in order to protect the slow developing."
• Thinthickbigred

  Id say abnormal but acceptable . To me there is nothing normal about two people of the same sex having sex . I dont care though and to each there own .
• mella

  I don't think that many of us would argue that 2 women having sex is a bad thing, normal or not.
• Thinthickbigred

  mella;1082710 wrote:I don't think that many of us would argue that 2 women having sex is a bad thing, normal or not.

  Thats kind of glib . I really dont care about the woman on woman thing . You think woman like watching two guys doing a 69? Man on woman period . Thats for me . Not into anal sex either ,but it takes different strokes for different folks .
• Bio-Hazzzzard

  

  Thinthickbigred;1082723 wrote: Man on woman period .

  ...Or woman on man:thumbup:
• IggyPride00

  

  Totally offensive in 2012, but he makes a few valid points about how being gay is not normal. Pretty funny routine.
  
  [video=youtube_share;fvs1n7L28EQ][/video]
• Con_Alma

  isadore;1082618 wrote:The possible physical and mental harm to outspring, the abuse it will generate in family situations both argue for the incest restriction. As can be seen in the your own arguments there is a slippery slope leading to the end of protections for the underaged from abuse.
  Con_Alma "The age of consent doesn't respect the clear differences in young people's development, and as such 'punishes' the fast developers in order to protect the slow developing."

  It doesn't matte. Only an adult can enter a contract. I don't want that changed.
  
  All other adults, however, should not be denied this basic right. State sanctioning of marriages does that.
• isadore

  Con_Alma;1082798 wrote:It doesn't matte. Only an adult can enter a contract. I don't want that changed.
  
  All other adults, however, should not be denied this basic right. State sanctioning of marriages does that.

  so you support incestous marriage no matter the harm to the off spring and the inherent threat of abuse within the family. And sex with "fast developing" children.
• Thinthickbigred

  Bio-Hazzzzard;1082728 wrote:...Or woman on man:thumbup:

  Thats fun too. pussy feels good
• Con_Alma

  isadore;1082810 wrote:so you support incestous marriage no matter the harm to the off spring and the inherent threat of abuse within the family. And sex with "fast developing" children.

  I support the right of all adults who are able to enter into a contract being able to do so without permission of the State.
  
  I don't know what "sex with sat developing children even means". I can't definitively state I agree with something I don't know what it means.
  
  Children have nothing to do with being able to legally enter a contract.
• isadore

  Con_Alma;1083325 wrote:I support the right of all adults who are able to enter into a contract being able to do so without permission of the State.
  
  I don't know what "sex with sat developing children even means". I can't definitively state I agree with something I don't know what it means.
  
  Children have nothing to do with being able to legally enter a contract.

  are you dsylexic. You have the word "fast" in the quote you sited and you say it is "sat." That is one way to avoid trying to defend your statement defending sex and marriage with underage children. And that goes along with your support for incest even with the damage it will do to the off spring of the marriage and all the abuse it will cause within families.
• Bio-Hazzzzard

  

  isadore;1083361 wrote:are you dsylexic.

  I am suprised that you would discriminate with a comment like that.
• isadore

  That is a natural question, not discrimination. If you walked into a wall and I asked if you were blind, it is not discrimination but a natural question. If I asked you a question four times and you did not answer, then I asked you using sign language if you were deaf, it would not be discrimination but a natural question.
• Bio-Hazzzzard

  

  isadore;1083382 wrote:That is a natural question, not discrimination. If you walked into a wall and I asked if you were blind, it is not discrimination but a natural question. If I asked you a question four times and you did not answer, then I asked you using sign language if you were deaf, it would not be discrimination but a natural question.

  So your saying it's okay to see a person that looks like the steryotypical gay and assume that he/she is gay and say that it is a natural question without knowing them? Gays were born this way, correct?
• isadore

  Bio-Hazzzzard;1083394 wrote:So your saying it's okay to see a person that looks like the steryotypical gay and assume that he/she is gay and say that it is a natural question without knowing them? Gays were born this way, correct?

  all the thinks I listed are handicaps, being blind, deaf or dyslexic are handicaps. Not being able to read a word, running into a wall, not hearing a question are possible signs of those handicaps.
  a gay person is not handicappped although some bigots might consider him or her as not normal.
• hasbeen

  

  isadore;1083398 wrote:all the thinks I listed are handicaps, being blind, deaf or dyslexic are handicaps. Not being able to read a word, running into a wall, not hearing a question are possible signs of those handicaps.
  a gay person is not handicappped although some bigots might consider him or her as not normal.

  
  Then what exactly is the "natural question"?
• Bio-Hazzzzard

  

  pnhasbeen;1083399 wrote:Then what exactly is the "natural question"?

  Izzy was being discriminating and is trying to cop out of it, his natural thing to do.
• isadore

  pnhasbeen;1083399 wrote:Then what exactly is the "natural question"?

  natural question when you walk into a wall, are you blind, natural question when you read fast as ast, are you dsylexic, when you ask "then what exactly is the "natural question?" the natural question is are you an asshole?
• isadore

  Bio-Hazzzzard;1083400 wrote:Izzy was being discriminating and is trying to cop out of it, his natural thing to do.

  well the truth will obviously never set you free.
• Bio-Hazzzzard

  

  isadore;1083398 wrote: a gay person is not handicappped although some bigots might consider him or her as not normal.

  So just because a person can't hear or see you wouldn't consider them as a normal person?
• hasbeen

  

  isadore;1083401 wrote:natural question when you walk into a wall, are you blind, natural question when you read fast as ast, are you dsylexic, when you ask "then what exactly is the "natural question?" the natural question is are you an asshole?

  
  So a typo causes you to ask if someone is dyslexic? Who's the asshole?
• isadore

  Bio-Hazzzzard;1083405 wrote:So just because a person can't hear or see you wouldn't consider them as a normal person?

  I would consider them to be auditorally or visually challenged.
• isadore

  pnhasbeen;1083406 wrote:So a typo causes you to ask if someone is dyslexic? Who's the ****?

  you are and there is no typo.
• hasbeen

  

  isadore;1083409 wrote:I would consider them to be auditorally or visually challenged.

  
  Is that normal?