Archive

Disgusted with Right Wing Apologists

  • Commander of Awesome
    Back on topic:

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2017/08/29/what-more-proof-of-a-secret-russian-connection-do-we-need/?tid=ss_mail&utm_term=.c4098a5d55d0

    "What more proof of a secret Russian connection do we need?"

    I would like to know this as well. Directly lied about ties with Russia, cronies lied about it, caught red handed.....what are we waiting on?
  • fish82
    Dude, I have the utmost respect for your butthurt, but Russia isn’t happening. Best to keep humping the Nazi schtick. :laugh:
  • like_that
    Commander of Awesome;1869362 wrote:From link:




    Oh?




    Seems to be quite reputable and an even playing field. When confronted with the facts, and unable to find a reputable claim that Mother Jones/Huffington POstNYT/Etc.. They can't be solid sources bc they lean in a direction that you don't like. I get attacked for copying stories from reputable source, and intelligent posts on the subject, and then said I won't take a right leaning news outlet series. Based on......? If you can find one that is known for solid journalism, I'd be happy to read it. DO that instead of whining for fuck's sake. You're crying bc you're butthurt.



    Ahhh, moving the goalposts. "No I didn't mean award winning news outlet, I meant specific journalist!" lolk dude, whatever makes you feel better lil guy.


    You make it too easy. The best way to get your point across is to find a reputable right leaning news outlet. Shouldn't be difficult for you to find at least one.
    As I previously asked, is ESPN now a credible source to you all of a sudden? Also you are a dense fuck. All i said is if you can't take people seriously for posting certain sources, how can you expect anyone to take you seriously for posting certain far left leaning sources? For fucks sake how can you not realize that makes you a dumb fuck hypocrite? Grow up.

    Go ahead and take a poll to see how many people think mother jones, salon, and reddit posts are credible. I'm sure you won't because you know the response. Nothing funnier on this site than the fake internet tough guy act from COA. It brings the lulz that you actually believe you are the smartest and toughest person on this site and then all you do is post op-eds as your own thoughts.
  • like_that
    Commander of useful idiot;1869363 wrote:Back on topic:

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2017/08/29/what-more-proof-of-a-secret-russian-connection-do-we-need/?tid=ss_mail&utm_term=.c4098a5d55d0

    "What more proof of a secret Russian connection do we need?"

    I would like to know this as well. Directly lied about ties with Russia, cronies lied about it, caught red handed.....what are we waiting on?
    COA once again posts another op-ed, because he can't come up with his own thoughts LOL.
  • gut
    Here's every other WaPo article on Trump, in a nutshell:

    What more evidence do we need!?!?!?!?!!?!?!?!
    .
    .
    .
    We don't have any evidence, but the potential there is not a lack of evidence should continue to concern us.
  • HitsRus
    Wow ... as I typed my last post about not one prominent democrat came out against "Antifa" and their violent, anarchistic actions, Nancy Pelosi of all people, issued a formal statement condemning the group and their actions at Berkeley....
    Thank you.
  • like_that
    HitsRus;1869370 wrote:Wow ... as I typed my last post about not one prominent democrat came out against "Antifa" and their violent, anarchistic actions, Nancy Pelosi of all people, issued a formal statement condemning the group and their actions at Berkeley....
    Thank you.
    Even a broken watch is right twice a day.
  • Commander of Awesome
    like_that;1869366 wrote:COA once again posts another op-ed, because he can't come up with his own thoughts LOL.
    Since when did posting an op-ed become a taboo thing? What stupid criteria are you basing this on? Like_that's inner thoughts, "Op-ed doesn't agree with me, and COA just pwned me, so I'm going to pathetically grasp at straws!"
  • Commander of Awesome
    like_that;1869365 wrote:As I previously asked, is ESPN now a credible source to you all of a sudden? Also you are a dense fuck. All i said is if you can't take people seriously for posting certain sources, how can you expect anyone to take you seriously for posting certain far left leaning sources? For fucks sake how can you not realize that makes you a dumb fuck hypocrite? Grow up.

    Go ahead and take a poll to see how many people think mother jones, salon, and reddit posts are credible. I'm sure you won't because you know the response. Nothing funnier on this site than the fake internet tough guy act from COA. It brings the lulz that you actually believe you are the smartest and toughest person on this site and then all you do is post op-eds as your own thoughts.
    Since 1997 ESPN has been able to produce one thing (probably either OSTL or 30:30) that was worth a peabody award. Fox News? NADA

    Says more about your favorite news site than it does about ESPN. Any other fails?
  • gut
    HitsRus;1869370 wrote:Wow ... as I typed my last post about not one prominent democrat came out against "Antifa" and their violent, anarchistic actions, Nancy Pelosi of all people, issued a formal statement condemning the group and their actions at Berkeley....
    Thank you.
    Did that take her almost as long as it took Trump to "name names"?
  • Commander of Awesome
    How long until like_that resorts to another "FAKE NEWS" or "LEFT SIDED LIBERAL AGENDA!" as his only defense? I'm guessing his next post.
  • like_that
    Commander of Awesome;1869372 wrote:Since when did posting an op-ed become a taboo thing? What stupid criteria are you basing this on? Like_that's inner thoughts, "Op-ed doesn't agree with me, and COA just pwned me, so I'm going to pathetically grasp at straws!"
    No wonder why you think you are the smartest poster on this site. You literally think you pwn everybody and proclaim it yourself. It's embarrassing and cringeworthy.

    Posting an op-ed here and there is fine, but when 90% of your arguments consist of other people's opinions it is a pretty glaring sign you can't compose your own thoughts and arguments, and thus the term useful idiot comes into play. You literally copy and paste articles and then take those thoughts as if you came up with them on your own. As a result, you somehow believe that makes you intellectually superior. The scene from Good Will Hunting where Damon posterizes the Harvard guy was made for people like you. This is a discussion forum. Go back to college and write 15+ page research papers if you want to use 90% of someone else's thoughts.
  • like_that
    Commander of Awesome;1869375 wrote:How long until like_that resorts to another "FAKE NEWS" or "LEFT SIDED LIBERAL AGENDA!" as his only defense? I'm guessing his next post.
    Another logical fallacy form COA. Clearly COA didn't even read his own link regarding logical fallacies. Further proof COA doesn't even comprehend what he copy and pastes.
  • like_that
    Commander of Awesome;1869373 wrote:Since 1997 ESPN has been able to produce one thing (probably either OSTL or 30:30) that was worth a peabody award. Fox News? NADA

    Says more about your favorite news site than it does about ESPN. Any other fails?
    I don't watch or read Fox News. The whole point of bringing up Fox was to prove winning awards doesn't mean shit. You even bitch about certain actors/actresses/movies winning the academy awards. Just another example of COA deciding when an argument is allowed to be applied.
  • HitsRus
    Nancy Pelosi's statement...
  • Commander of Awesome
    Bah fake news! [insert over used political insult such as libatard that someone else thought of]

    like_that in a nutshell
  • Commander of Awesome
    Back on topic, so trump picks former devry university dean to head US dept of ed unit meant to police fraud.

    Conflict of interest anyone?

    Same devry that settled with the FTC for $100M for defrauding student.
  • Commander of Awesome
    like_that;1869379 wrote:I don't watch or read Fox News. The whole point of bringing up Fox was to prove winning awards doesn't mean shit. You even bitch about certain actors/actresses/movies winning the academy awards. Just another example of COA deciding when an argument is allowed to be applied.
    Right on cue, lol too easy.
  • like_that
    Commander of Awesome;1869387 wrote:Bah fake news! [insert over used political insult such as libatard that someone else thought of]

    like_that in a nutshell
    Haven't said anything that remotely resembles this post, but whatever makes you sleep at night.

    Your post translated: "I have nothing. "

    I think you have exhausted your failed arguments. I stand by my original comment, since we swayed away from it. You post these sources and somehow you can't comprehend why Trump is normalized.
  • like_that
    Commander of Awesome;1869390 wrote:Right on cue, lol too easy.
    Translated again: "I have nothing"

    Edit: I don't even think you know what you're trying to prove at this point [emoji23].
  • Commander of Awesome
    like_that, will you condemn Trump's pick to police for-profit college fraud spent who spent the majority of career at the biggest for-profit college fraud?
  • like_that
    Commander of Awesome;1869393 wrote:like_that, will you condemn Trump's pick to police for-profit college fraud spent who spent the majority of career at the biggest for-profit college fraud?
    Sure, Trump is a shit bag.
  • Commander of Awesome
    This should get like_that all triggered!

  • Commander of Awesome
    InB4 "NOT AN ORIGINAL THOUGHT!!!!!11"
  • like_that
    ITT COA rattled for being called out for posting other people's thoughts as his thoughts 90% of the time [emoji23].